Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Shooting in Connecticut (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=39507)

Tony_SS 01-16-2013 10:59 AM

If you disagree with anything the govt does, you are too crazy to own a gun and put on a no buy list.

I'm sure that is what they are getting at.

Sieg 01-16-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony_SS (Post 458438)
If you disagree with anything the govt does, you are too crazy to own a gun and put on a no buy list.

I'm sure that is what they are getting at.

I agree with a lot of the military's weapons systems and tactics - does that count? :D

GregWeld 01-16-2013 12:22 PM

In Congress -- this will divide into a Republican vs Democrat partisan issue...

I'm all for a lot of the stuff the executive order lays out -- but most of it is just "busy work"... because all the checks in the world don't keep someone from doing something bad - let alone all the stolen stuff people have. And we all know MONEY will buy anything anytime regardless of the crime.

Most of this is nothing more than the tree huggers foisting their socialist version of the world on those that don't agree with them. We should all live in a commune - raise each others babies and just love everybody all the time. :woot:

Sieg 01-16-2013 01:49 PM

Interesting that the news is just releasing the first details of two shootings that took place yesterday vs. before Obama took stage and did his little acting skit with the children.

Ketzer 01-16-2013 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicks67ca (Post 458436)
Here is a list of the Executive orders.

1. "Issue a presidential memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system."

2. "Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system."

3. "Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system."

4. "Direct the attorney general to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks."

5. "Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun."

6. "Publish a letter from ATF to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers."

7. "Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign."

8. "Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission)."

9. "Issue a presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations."

10. "Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement."

11. "Nominate an ATF director."

12. "Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations."

13. "Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime."

14. "Issue a presidential memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence."

15. "Direct the attorney general to issue a report on the availability and most effective use of new gun safety technologies and challenge the private sector to develop innovative technologies."

16. "Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes."

17. "Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities."

18. "Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers."

19. "Develop model emergency response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education."

20. "Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover."

21. "Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges."

22. "Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations."

23. "Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health."

Why does any of this need to be an iron fisted executive order?

transam 01-16-2013 01:56 PM

If obama wants all gun owners to have background checks does that mean ftf private sales will be illegal? I would assume they must be done through a licensed dealer for a fee under his new plan?

Sieg 01-16-2013 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ketzer (Post 458466)
Why does any of this need to be an iron fisted executive order?

Because the sheep flock to it? Reality is it lack's substance in most cases.

Spiffav8 01-16-2013 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by transam (Post 458468)
If obama wants all gun owners to have background checks does that mean ftf private sales will be illegal? I would assume they must be done through a licensed dealer for a fee under his new plan?

Yes that's what it means. It would also add the buyer to a list of registered gun owners.

While I am not against anyone buying a gun from another (dealer or private sale) I am against being put on a list. Shouldn't it be a list of criminals and mentally ill people who are not allowed to own guns?

transam 01-16-2013 02:27 PM

These laws are using extreme cases and rare cases to enforce rules that do not apple to 90% of the gun murders out there. To have those 4 kids on stage,staged of course to make sure was pc was such a shame to see. I am not even a hardcore gun rights advocate,but i dont like what i am seeing,and i live in Canada. Im sure next time a thief breaks into a house to steal a gun he will have to ask the owner to run a record check first.

Z10ROD 01-16-2013 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ketzer (Post 458466)
Why does any of this need to be an iron fisted executive order?

EXACTLY why wasn't this already being done ? well because of the lobbiest were scaring people into thinking he could actually take GUNS so nothing was done

ALL GUNS SALES SHOULD CONTAIN A BACKGROUND CK PERIOD even if you have to go to your local gun shop for back ground ck with private sales

no law will ever stop all bad people from gun sales but that doesn't mean we do nothing.

lets see if congress can pull just that off ???

Spiffav8 01-16-2013 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by transam (Post 458480)
These laws are using extreme cases and rare cases to enforce rules that do not apple to 90% of the gun murders out there. To have those 4 kids on stage,staged of course to make sure was pc was such a shame to see. I am not even a hardcore gun rights advocate,but i dont like what i am seeing,and i live in Canada. Im sure next time a thief breaks into a house to steal a gun he will have to ask the owner to run a record check first.

:lol:

Yeah...kind of funny how the gun grabbers are using children to fuel the fire, yet when the Presidents kids are used as an example it's suddenly 'going to far'.

:rolleyes:

Vince@Meanstreets 01-16-2013 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by transam (Post 458468)
If obama wants all gun owners to have background checks does that mean ftf private sales will be illegal? I would assume they must be done through a licensed dealer for a fee under his new plan?

Most likly adopt CA method of transfers/sales through FFL gun dealers.

Vince@Meanstreets 01-16-2013 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z10ROD (Post 458483)
EXACTLY why wasn't this already being done ? well because of the lobbiest were scaring people into thinking he could actually take GUNS so nothing was done

ALL GUNS SALES SHOULD CONTAIN A BACKGROUND CK PERIOD even if you have to go to your local gun shop for back ground ck with private sales

no law will ever stop all bad people from gun sales but that doesn't mean we do nothing.

lets see if congress can pull just that off ???

Funny how that works. The first Biden ban expired in 2006, since then the government has cut budgets to cities which in turn decreased the police forces, that lead to an increase in crime. Cut budgets to the medical field. Now they are talking about a half billion be put to a problem the may have contributed to in the first place?

Oakland CA has a crime problem. Their police force was cut almost in half. The Mayor gets rid of a decent Police chief and now they are looking at hiring a consultant to help deal with the problem they have with crime. Price tag for that is $245K.

I just don't get it.

Tony_SS 01-16-2013 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by transam (Post 458468)
If obama wants all gun owners to have background checks does that mean ftf private sales will be illegal? I would assume they must be done through a licensed dealer for a fee under his new plan?

No, that is solely determined by your state. He can order some agency to enforce something, and Congress could pass some law, but the states have the authority to legislate, not Congress in this matter.

Many states have already pass their own laws making it illegal for any federal intrusion, and many states have similar bills in the works.

So once again a president is trying use the executive to ignore the Constitution and asking Congress do the same.

Today was a typical response that the govt must 'do something'. That something will result another bureaucratic growth of another perpetual waste program.

If find it interesting how the media and politicians virtually ignore that fact that all the kid killers are on legal pharmaceuticals. That is the problem, and it will get worse because it isn't ignored, but 'encouraged' as 'mental health' treatment will be funded through the roof.

Pretty much the opposite of what needed to be done is happening.

Violent crime has dropped 49% and gun ownership has skyrocketed over the past 20 years. FBI statistics. Guns aren't the problem. Am I preaching to the choir here? :lol:

GregWeld 01-16-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicks67ca (Post 458436)
Here is a list of the Executive orders.

1. "Issue a presidential memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system."


Great! This will require years to undertake and billions in additional costs to rehab the oldest bunch of out dated computers in the world. I think some agencies are using punch card and IBM AS400s


2. "Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system."


Another 900 pages of rules and regulations nobody can comprehend.


3. "Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system."


Read number 1


4. "Direct the attorney general to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks."


OMG yes --- NOW we should be doing this!

But first you'd actually have to know who those people are...





5. "Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun."


Really.... This takes an executive order of the POTUS? I thought maybe that was just common sense


6. "Publish a letter from ATF to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers."


1900 pages.....


7. "Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign."


In other words --- join the NRA??




8. "Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission)."


Yep - because those damn pesky criminals walking around with 'em stuck in their belts are just not locking up their guns correctly! And we need to make them safer!



9. "Issue a presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations."


You mean they don't do this already?? OMG....



10. "Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement."


Yes -- but if they're lost or stolen -- how are we going to get information on them?? I mean - if we knew where they were they wouldn't be lost would they?


11. "Nominate an ATF director."


He's been in office 4 f'n' years and hasn't done this yet -- now I'm really feeling unsafe because we don't have an ATF director!!




12. "Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations."


OMG -- is this man that stupid? First responders won't go in with an active shooter - they're UNARMED -- School officials are also UNARMED - so in other words the only people that are going to respond will be the POLICE who are armed and are the best trained people in the world.


13. "Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime."


WELL -- BRILLIANT.... like nobody was doing this already.



14. "Issue a presidential memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence."


Or ask any man walking down the street because this ain't rocket science!




15. "Direct the attorney general to issue a report on the availability and most effective use of new gun safety technologies and challenge the private sector to develop innovative technologies."



Gun safety? Guns aren't safe -- people do the killing.... Maybe we should ask NASA to develop a Mental Illness personal safety device



16. "Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes."




Yeah because crooks and insane people are so f'n' honest!!!




17. "Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities."


Like they didn't know this already....




18. "Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers."


IT TOOK 18 presidential edicts to get to something that MIGHT help a little.



19. "Develop model emergency response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education."


Or -- just call 911




20. "Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover."


But first -- wouldn't this only be helpful to people already seeking help? Not many of these types of goofballs shooters that I've read about were being treated or under professional care.



21. "Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges."


Another 800 pages of gibberish -- but man does that sound like keeping everyone safe to me!!




22. "Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations."


Yes -- because the mentally ill love regulations and abide by them all the time!! I'm feeling safer by the minute!



23. "Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health."



Lip service.... the government is broke - the do gooders don't want the mental institutions these people used to be kept in - we set them free and they're on "skid road" in every town in America.... but somehow these people aren't the ones killing kids in schools or malls or colleges.... They may be pesky nuisances but they're dying from cold weather - bad dumpster dives and booze - not from semi automatics. They need help but have nothing to do with gun violence

Sieg 01-16-2013 04:56 PM

Here's some common sense points from someone DC'ers probably classify as a mental case.


Quote:

NUGENT: Open letter to Joe Biden on guns

‘Gun control’ won’t save lives

Joe,

Congratulations on your appointment to lead a presidential commission to end gun-related violence.

As a National Rifle Association board member, husband, father, grandfather, law enforcement officer and genuinely concerned American, I too want nothing more than to see evil, senseless massacres stopped. I concur with the president and caring people everywhere: It’s time to end these slaughters.

As you gather your team to study massacres and how to stop them, I offer to you my services and a lifetime of expertise on guns in all their implementations. While I strongly differ with President Obama on many issues, I agree with him that we must work with all we can possibly muster to end these tragedies.

As you begin to formulate your thoughts on how to proceed with your task, I hope your starting point is to provide the president with the facts regarding these slaughters and to offer him common-sense recommendations that are void of a political agenda and will actually make a meaningful difference. If the American people smell a political agenda here, that will only bog down our efforts.

In the spirit of goodwill and a deep desire to end gut-wrenching, incredibly sad and senseless rampages, I offer you the following recommendations:

I encourage you to persuade the president to lead this effort by providing a number of public service announcements. The announcements should include watching out for each other, encouraging parents to be more involved in their children’s lives regarding entertainment choices, and knowing various indicators we should watch for in people who are unstable.

Clearly, the focus on solving these mass murders must be on the mentally ill. In almost every instance of mass killing, there were ample red flags and warning alarms that either were avoided or were not acted upon by mental health professionals, family members, friends and acquaintances. While I deeply respect an individual’s privacy and civil liberties, the American people need basic awareness of what indicators to look for regarding potentially violent, psychotic people. Our collective safety begins with being collectively vigilant.

You will find in your assessment that all of the massacres have occurred in gun-free zones. What gun-free zones create is an environment where good people are unarmed and virtually defenseless against an unstable person intent on committing mass murder. Gun-free zones are modern killing fields. I implore you to recommend that Congress pass a law to ban gun-free zones immediately.

Just like your full-time, armed security detail, qualified citizens with authorized, legal concealed-carry permits should be able to carry weapons virtually everywhere to protect themselves, their loved ones and innocents.

I also implore you to strongly consider recommending that trained school officials have access to weapons to protect students. Just as airline pilots may have access to a weapon to prevent another Sept. 11 mass murder, school officials also should be trained to stop shooting sprees at our schools.

I don’t encourage you to recommend a ban on any weapon, magazine capacity or type of ammunition. That won’t accomplish anything other than prevent the 99.9 percent of responsible, law-abiding Americans from enjoying these modern weapons as we do now. We should never recommend or develop public policy that restricts the rights of the good guys based upon what evil people do or might do. If that were the case, alcohol still would be banned. As you may know, drunk drivers kill an estimated 12,000 Americans each year and hurt tens of thousands more.

I encourage you also to keep this misnamed “gun violence” in perspective. While all deaths are tragic, the vast majority of gun-related murders and violence are committed by gang members who do not use guns that look like — but do not perform like — military assault weapons. The majority of crimes that involve a firearm are committed with handguns. I concurred with you back in 2008 when you stated, “If [Mr. Obama] tries to fool with my Beretta, he’s got a problem.” I trust you still maintain those sentiments.

Again, I offer you my services and a lifetime of expertise. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Ted Nugent

GregWeld 01-16-2013 05:04 PM

I couldn't copy and paste here --- but you've got to check out what's up in WYOMING....

Hysterical! I may think about moving from Washington to Wyoming - I gotta like these people!



http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/wyoming.asp

Shmoov69 01-16-2013 05:54 PM

Kind of ironic after what just went down........

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spiffav8 (Post 458488)
:lol:

Yeah...kind of funny how the gun grabbers are using children to fuel the fire, yet when the Presidents kids are used as an example it's suddenly 'going to far'.

:rolleyes:


Vince@Meanstreets 01-17-2013 12:40 AM

You wanna know what gets me? The Pres took care of this fast than deciding if we should send aid to Storm Sandy victims. I guess they had to see how much they could put aside for this crusade first.

Tony_SS 01-17-2013 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 458510)
I couldn't copy and paste here --- but you've got to check out what's up in WYOMING....

Hysterical! I may think about moving from Washington to Wyoming - I gotta like these people!



http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/wyoming.asp

Please do not reference Snopes for the truth... they're extremely biased, not to mention flat out wrong.

It wont let me copy and paste, but the last paragraph says something that the Constitution states that federal law is superior to state law. :lol:

It's like the 10th Amendment doesn't exist to those liberals.

camcojb 01-17-2013 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony_SS (Post 458603)
Please do not reference Snopes for the truth... they're extremely biased, not to mention flat out wrong.

It wont let me copy and paste, but the last paragraph says something that the Constitution states that federal law is superior to state law. :lol:

It's like the 10th Amendment doesn't exist to those liberals.

They're probably going by what currently is happening vs the actual laws or constitution. Reference Californias legal medical marijuana laws and the Feds busting them anyway. :rolleyes:

Tony_SS 01-17-2013 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camcojb (Post 458611)
They're probably going by what currently is happening vs the actual laws or constitution. Reference Californias legal medical marijuana laws and the Feds busting them anyway. :rolleyes:

True, but I would refer them to the states of WA and CO and how they recently legalized marijuana for recreational use. Yes, states can do and did that. :)

intocarss 01-17-2013 11:59 AM

COLUMBINE STUDENT'S FATHER 12 YEARS LATER!!(2011)

Guess our national leaders didn't expect this. On Thursday, Darrell Scott, the father of Rachel Scott, a victim of the Columbine High School shootings in Littleton, Colorado, was invited to address the House Judiciary Committee's subcommittee. What he said to our national leaders during this special session of Congress was painfully truthful. They were not prepared for what he was to say, nor was it received well. It needs to be heard by every parent, every teacher, every politician, every sociologist, every psychologist, and every so-called expert! These courageous words spoken by Darrell Scott are powerful, penetrating, and deeply personal. There is no doubt that God sent this man as a voice crying in the wilderness. The following is a portion of the transcript:

"Since the dawn of creation there has been both good &evil in the hearts of men and women. We all contain the seeds of kindness or the seeds of violence. The death of my wonderful daughter, Rachel Joy Scott, and the deaths of that heroic teacher, and the other eleven children who died must not be in vain. Their blood cries out for answers. "The first recorded act of violence was when Cain slew his brother Abel out in the field. The villain was not the club he used.. Neither was it the NCA, the National Club Association. The true killer was Cain, and the reason for the murder could only be found in Cain's heart. "In the days that followed the Columbine tragedy, I was amazed at how quickly fingers began to be pointed at groups such as the NRA. I am not a member of the NRA. I am not a hunter. I do not even own a gun. I am not here to represent or defend the NRA - because I don't believe that they are responsible for my daughter's death. Therefore I do not believe that they need to be defended. If I believed they had anything to do with Rachel's murder I would be their strongest opponent I am here today to declare that Columbine was not just a tragedy -- it was a spiritual event that should be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of the blame lies here in this room. Much of the blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the accusers themselves. I wrote a poem just four nights ago that expresses my feelings best.

Your laws ignore our deepest needs, Your words are empty air. You've stripped away our heritage, You've outlawed simple prayer. Now gunshots fill our classrooms, And precious children die. You seek for answers everywhere, And ask the question "Why?" You regulate restrictive laws, Through legislative creed. And yet you fail to understand, That God is what we need!

"Men and women are three-part beings. We all consist of body, mind, and spirit. When we refuse to acknowledge a third part of our make-up, we create a void that allows evil, prejudice, and hatred to rush in and wreak havoc. Spiritual presences were present within our educational systems for most of our nation's history. Many of our major colleges began as theological seminaries. This is a historical fact. What has happened to us as a nation? We have refused to honor God, and in so doing, we open the doors to hatred and violence. And when something as terrible as Columbine's tragedy occurs -- politicians immediately look for a scapegoat such as the NRA. They immediately seek to pass more restrictive laws that contribute to erode away our personal and private liberties. We do not need more restrictive laws. Eric and Dylan would not have been stopped by metal detectors. No amount of gun laws can stop someone who spends months planning this type of massacre. The real villain lies within our own hearts.

"As my son Craig lay under that table in the school library and saw his two friends murdered before his very eyes, he did not hesitate to pray in school. I defy any law or politician to deny him that right! I challenge every young person in America , and around the world, to realize that on April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School prayer was brought back to our schools. Do not let the many prayers offered by those students be in vain. Dare to move into the new millennium with a sacred disregard for legislation that violates your God-given right to communicate with Him.

To those of you who would point your finger at the NRA -- I give to you a sincere challenge.. Dare to examine your own heart before casting the first stone! My daughter's death will not be in vain! The young people of this country will not allow that to happen!" - Darrell Scott

camcojb 01-17-2013 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony_SS (Post 458633)
True, but I would refer them to the states of WA and CO and how they recently legalized marijuana for recreational use. Yes, states can do and did that. :)

and how long do you think before the Feds start busting them? It's legal here too, and it makes no difference to them.

Tony_SS 01-17-2013 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camcojb (Post 458659)
and how long do you think before the Feds start busting them? It's legal here too, and it makes no difference to them.

I don't know.. hopefully never. Maybe if enough states/sheriff's stand up they'll back down, but it seems the power does what it wants.

Tony_SS 01-17-2013 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garickman (Post 458676)
Federal Law ALWAYS supersedes State Law. It is known as the The Supremacy Clause and it can be found in Article VI, clause 2 of the United States Constitution. It establishes the U.S. Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. Treaties as "the supreme law of the land." The text decrees these to be the highest form of law in the U.S. legal system, and mandates that all state judges must follow federal law when a conflict arises between federal law and either the state constitution or state law of any state. (Note that the word "must" is used, which makes it a necessity, a compulsion.)

Through 2010, resolutions have been introduced in the legislatures of 27 states that would nullify federal authority over such local firearms. The legislation passed in Montana and Tennessee in 2009 and in Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming the following year. South Carolina has taken the issue one step further: in 2010 a bill was introduced which would effectively nullify all gun registration laws within the state.

HOWEVER, unless the Supreme Court reverses its decision from 1958 Cooper V. Aaron, (not likely) the Supreme Court of the United States held that federal law prevails over state law due to the operation of the Supremacy Clause, and that federal law "can neither be nullified openly and directly by state legislators or state executive or judicial officers nor nullified indirectly by them through evasive schemes . . . ." Thus, state laws purporting to nullify federal statutes or to exempt states and their citizens from federal statutes have only SYMBOLIC IMPACT.

Sorry Greg but that is just not true. This article explains here:

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010...use-smackdown/

The key is that the federal government was supreme only in its enumerated powers under the confines of the Constitution. That's all the supremacy clause says. It doesn't say the fed govt is a King to rule over us.

It's important to remember the States created the Federal govt, not the other way around. We have States for a reason, and that which is not delegated specifically to the fed govt, bound by the Constitution, is reserved to the states and the people. 10th Amendment.

The States did not create a 'King', the fought a war to escape from one. Original intent can not be ignored to those who try and interpret the Constitution.

Shmoov69 01-17-2013 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by intocarss (Post 458653)
COLUMBINE STUDENT'S FATHER 12 YEARS LATER!!(2011)

- Darrell Scott

Thanks for that info, I had not heard that. As most of y'all know already, I agree!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony_SS (Post 458688)

The States did not create a 'King', the fought a war to escape from one. Original intent can not be ignored to those who try and interpret the Constitution.

T, why do want to bring up, the "original intent" of the Constitution?? The government has been ignoring that for years!!! :mad:

sniper 01-18-2013 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony_SS (Post 458688)
Original intent can not be ignored to those who try and interpret the Constitution.

The irony of the concept of the Constitution being a "living" document is that it was designed to be the steadfast reliable backbone of our country in "trying" times. It is a guarantee of protections of it's people not for the government. Yet every time there is some great cause, the government runs right over the Constitution to institute protections and laws it deems necessary. I don't care which party you want to talk about either, as they are both willing to trample on our rights.

Original intent was to have a document and basis of rights to keep our federal government in check NO MATTER WHAT THE CRISIS OF THE CURRENT TIME is. No matter how many shootings, school or otherwise happen, there is NO basis for gun control.

Sieg 01-18-2013 06:35 PM

http://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-Q.../i-QnFfLnd.jpg

Z10ROD 01-18-2013 06:36 PM

I think most are missing the point here although Joe and Potus asked congress to ban assault weapons and large clips as well as back ground checks for all sales his executive actions all deal with being able to inforce laws already on the books ( ATF ) SENATE CONFORMATION OF A DIRECTOR AND just make it more difficult for insane and felons to get gun's ???? what else could they do ?? not much. I think congress will do the background ck deal and that will be enough. without taking anyones rights that should have those rights ???? and as far as who has juristiction ???? its federal no question. nice try though:cheers:

realcoray 01-18-2013 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sniper (Post 458840)
Original intent was to have a document and basis of rights to keep our federal government in check NO MATTER WHAT THE CRISIS OF THE CURRENT TIME is. No matter how many shootings, school or otherwise happen, there is NO basis for gun control.

So, felons should be able to have guns? The mentally ill? Not only that, but they should be able to have RPGs and automatic weapons right?

You can control guns without banning anything but pro gun rights people refuse to acknowledge that since they feel like if they give an inch someone would take a mile.

If the NRA would just accept background searches for all sales, chances are you could avoid a ban on anything but they won't and so they may end up with both.

Sieg 01-18-2013 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 458951)
So, felons should be able to have guns? The mentally ill? Not only that, but they should be able to have RPGs and automatic weapons right?

Felons have guns and always will, habitual felons on the catch and release program thanks to over "correction facility" crowding.

The mentally have guns, thanks to the felons and careless family and friends. A good friend of mine Chris Kilcullen (motorcycle cop) was shot and killed not to long ago by an older female mental case during a traffic stop. Freak shot one round, in the arm pit above his body amour that hit him in the heart. 5 shot snub-nose revolver with .38 wadcutter ammunition. Not high cap, not semi-auto, not full auto, not the feared "cop killer" bullets. Target practice ammunition.

Not sure on the RPG's but the local pot growers in Lance County and adjacent county's are protecting their crops with full auto weapons. They don't abide by the current laws yet you believe new and improved ones will change that?

My 14 year old son is has mental issues and I'm a hell of a lot more concerned about our kitchen knives and baseball bats than firearms. If someone breaks into your place while you're sleeping are your weapons properly secured?

GregWeld 01-18-2013 09:36 PM

The entire argument about MORE LAWS are needed is so senseless...


What more law do you need than -- It's against the law to murder people.


Like a guy that is a murderer cares about gun laws? Or any other law for that matter.

Sieg 01-18-2013 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 458957)
The entire argument about MORE LAWS are needed is so senseless...

What more law do you need than -- It's against the law to murder people.

Like a guy that is a murderer cares about gun laws? Or any other law for that matter.

My perception is that until the punishment is severe enough to get the criminals attention the laws are worthless.

Singapore's system is relatively effective from my limited research.

Vince@Meanstreets 01-19-2013 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sieg (Post 458961)
My perception is that until the punishment is severe enough to get the criminals attention the laws are worthless.

Singapore's system is relatively effective from my limited research.

Again, criminals do not think like we do. They have no fear in punishment. Most are return criminals or from a criminal familly and know how the system works. They just know that they will do what it takes to get away with a crime.

I believe the only way to fix the problem is dealing with the root cause. Before they lead to criminal life style.

As far as the laws, they are there. They do not work or apply to criminals. They apply to purchasers. Car thieves don't go to dealerships or used car lots for cars. They steal cars.

sniper 01-19-2013 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 458951)
So, felons should be able to have guns? The mentally ill? Not only that, but they should be able to have RPGs and automatic weapons right?

First of all you admit that there are different severity of felons. A guy who broke the clean air act by doing illegal state inspections is not the same as a guy who robbed a bank. But even so, by becoming a felon you surrender some of your rights. You have proven an inability to conform to a basic society without infringing on the rights of someone else. If you want to try and equate that type of person with others whom act fairly normal than go ahead.
Personally I could care less if a felon has a gun. Why is that my business? If they want a gun, they will get one illegally anyway. A background check isn't going to stop them.

A friend of mine is a felon. Does he not have the right to protect himself and his family?

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 458951)
You can control guns without banning anything but pro gun rights people refuse to acknowledge that since they feel like if they give an inch someone would take a mile.

"feel" Do you know who the POTUS will be in 50 years? Patriot act anyone?

intocarss 01-20-2013 07:15 AM

http://www.assaultweapon.info/

GregWeld 01-20-2013 08:58 AM

That's a very interesting and informative slide show. Thanks for posting it.

Of course -- no matter the actual FACTS.... the tree hugging anti gun folks will just argue that ALL GUNS should be taken away from everyone "since there is no need for anyone to have one". Ultimately we know that's the real goal of a large swath of America.

intocarss 01-20-2013 02:50 PM

http://www.thecommentator.com/articl...cation_of_guns

out2kayak 01-20-2013 09:20 PM

Hmm... Food for thought:



:cheers:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net