Whole bottle of salt in the wound...:D

It makes DG happy. :thumbsup:

I was under the impression we were building motors to compete in the 3500 -7000 rpm range. But if 4800-7500 is apples to apples in your guys eyes looks like I got beat pretty good on hp.

I guess the rules changed over the past year while we were waiting for Flash's motor :lmao:

My dinosaur did make the best peak torque by a couple of lbs and avg torque is pretty much a wash depending on what rpm range you work off.

So I'm stoked on my feeble 700hp 642ft lb dinosaur.

The salt is fine with a little lime and a Pacifico or Victoria. Keep it coming if you like. :relax:

:cheers:

Ok bitter beer face....

We did. But professional engine builders don't let customers run the dyno.... in their basement..... with the gimp tied up around the corner. :eek:

So you know I didn't get a 3500 and up dyno run. So the closest I got is 3900 to 7000. Post up your average torque in that range since the HP war is a lost cause. :action-smiley-027:

Avg torque 3900 to 7000 = 595.9

(range on the sheet is 3900 to 6500 so I had to manually calc it)

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...psa9489ae2.jpg

Does this mean we won't be having group Starbucks first thing in the mornings anymore??

:catfight:

Ya think this dude went to the Salt Lick or Rudy's?

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...psdc336e3b.gif

Of course we will. But we won't be going ANYWHERE that Brian recommends afterwards.:disgusted:



[QUOTE=Flash68;501187]Ok bitter beer face....



We did. But professional engine builders don't let customers run the dyno.... in their basement..... with the gimp tied up around the corner. :eek:

So you know I didn't get a 3500 and up dyno run. So the closest I got is 3900 to 7000. Post up your average torque in that range since the HP war is a lost cause. :action-smiley-027:

Avg torque 3900 to 7000 = 595.9

(range on the sheet is 3900 to 6500 so I had to manually calc it)

Really DG? You think that answers the question. Your torque peak is at 5700 rpm. So if we say your optimum torque curve is within 2600 rpm 1300 above and below that peak your range is 4400 to 7000. Great for you we both ran dyno runs in that range cuz dyno owners and operators don't like beating on their dynos at low RPM.

For me my torque peak was at 4900 so using the same logic that is 3600-6200. I don't have any E85 Dyno #s from 3600 to 4500.

At 4500 my motor on E85 made 40 lbs more torque than my first gas dyno test run at 4500. In otherwords my 3600-4400 data is Sh:censored: if you feel good about it use those #s and you will probably win but considering on your best hp run you posted your motor was down 2lbs of torque from my peak I don't think that tells the true story.

That would make as much sense as us saying whoever had the best #s at say 4500 rpm is the winner. :headscratch: I like that one:D

FE , :Tomcat: ,SB2.2
TQ HP, :Tomcat: ,TQ HP
635.3 547.2, :Tomcat: ,558.1 478.2

:y0!: If that car ever runs then there is a way to settle this.

https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=42769

:cheers:

I'm with you on the Victoria beer. Keep the lime. :cheers:

.

Neither have ribs that look that good... :)

My actual dinner @ "THE SALT LICK"....






http://i919.photobucket.com/albums/a...s/file-152.jpg






And my guess is --- on track with these two --- we're going to see a whole lotta this....







http://i919.photobucket.com/albums/a...s/file-131.jpg

If 3500-7000 was the bet, settle it at 5250 rpm. Rob gets 5200 and Dave 5300.

Dave: 634.50 tq 640.3 hp
Rob: I can't stand to look back through this thread no mo.... Post your numbers Rob.

5200 632.5 626.2

Based on the poll, I'd say we have a winner by a slim margin.


626.3 tq 620.4hp These were my numbers at 5200 with my pro touring camshaft. ha (With 16 less cubes than Rob I may add)

Congradulations. You secured third place by a small margin. A few more ci and you could have been a contender.:lmao:


That dam place is now on my bucket list. I should have already checked that box. :bur2:

I forgive you GW for casting the deciding vote for the wrong BBQ choice that hot miserable eve in Houston. I myself may have voted against Yelp, and my own internet research, based on local knowledge.

Who was to know a Texan knew so little about BBQ :headscratch:

:cheers:

With over 1.36 hp per cube, even a Ford guy can do that math. :action-smiley-027:

Just incase: 1.36x16ci

648 tq 641.7 hp Hell, that even puts me ahead of Dave.

Help me out #s wizard.

Was your peak 1.36 hp per ci # at 5250?

What would you say 620.4 divided by 489 would be?

What would the significance of that # be?

What is 700.7 divided by 496?

You're a smart guy you'll figure it out.

Who should post the answers you or I? :mock:

:cheers:

:trophy-1302: :D

Since polls are in vogue...

I know we aren't all from Texas, but which BBQ joint would you choose?

The Salt Lick BBQ
4.5 star rating
1586 reviews

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...psa0a53a32.jpg

or this one:

Black's Barbecue
4.0 star rating
394 reviews

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...ps4341343c.jpg

First you EAT at The Salt Lick.... then you GO to the other....