![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"First, the good stuff. Pics and video of the finished fenders. Fenders are meant to bolt into the stock locations using stock mounting hardware. These are some BIG ASS fenders, but came out weighing just 9.1 pounds each. The stock fenders are 33.4 pounds each, for a savings of 24.3 pounds each and almost 50 pounds altogether!!! They could have been even lighter if not for the fact that the customer wanted them to appear stock and bolt into the stock locations." |
Yeah a couple factors get involved - were these vacuum bagged parts specifically built to be lightweight ? and how thick and durable were the final parts ? (BTW did he say what they cost ?)
The few times I've seen weights on Anvil stuff it was light but not exceptionally so (because they build OEM style quality for one thing). LIke I said I know Mustang fenders best, about 25 lbs apiece (and a little lighter when I'd done with them) on the early cars. The FG versions are 15 lbs, and I seem to remember the Anvils were around 12 lbs. Maybe they are a lot lighter than that, but I think Paul Brown's SN95 vacuum bagged built for lightness fenders were 4 lbs apiece, so that is about hte lower limit there, and I know Anvil's weigh more than that. Anyway not trying to start a kefuffle or anything, I'm just riffing off of my own attempts to save weight it was very difficult to justify $1500+ pair of fenders that I can't repair to save 20 lbs, and I'm very curious to get real world weights on stuff. |
realistically, $75 a pound isn't a stretch in the racing world and most times just off setting for safety equipment.
|
|
They say no good deed goes unpunished. Good deed number 1: I went to our alignment shop so that Gregg could take the Falken tires off of my Camaro and put them on his before he leaves for his road trip. Good deed number 2: Dick lends me his truck to run over a valve stem cap and hit the gate at the alignment shop.... Then I had to go to the bank. So yeah, technically it is all Gregg's fault. :rolleyes:
Gotta keep the paint shop busy. |
Quote:
Sorry, couldn't resist. :D |
Quote:
|
I saw it on facebook so I was going to ask who's truck you used to go for the parts. Shew ! glad I didn't have to be the first one to mention it. :D
|
Nice driving ACE. :D
|
you can hit the cones but avoid the metal things.
|
Quote:
It might not look like much without and engine, but it was a ton of work. http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...psf3e7ab60.jpg |
Matt I'm tired just looking at it! :D
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yep, bodywork takes friggin forever. My family put me on suicide watch while I was doing mine on my car. Never again! :lol: Congrats on the continued progress Matt.
|
It looks nice Matt, atleast you can say you did it.
|
Quote:
|
Not too shabby for a Camaro guy.
|
Hey guys, I have pictures to post, and they're not old recycled ones like Rob has, they're new ones, and they aren't of hubs with yellow lug nuts or aluminum blocks with iron heads either. :lol:
After doing all of the body work on the engine compartment I started mocking everything up so that I could start fabricating some bracing/tubing that will be used to attach stuff to. Part of the idea behind the car has been to draw on some of the cool original design elements of the early Mustangs and Shelbys and change and or update them without creating a contemporary looking custom build that feels "new." I hope that makes some sense. In keeping with that theme I wanted to add engine bay bracing that was reminiscent of the old shock tower - to - firewall and "monte carlo" bars that the original cars had. And yes, before anyone says it, I clearly sacrificed some function with that huge bend in the monte carlo bar, but the air for the engine has to come from somewhere. http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...ps7b0e1d51.jpg http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...ps9cea04cb.jpg After building all of the bracing I was hoping to move away from more little body and fab projects, it is really easy to come up with simple little ideas that turn into small but time consuming projects. One of the projects at BOS right now is a twin turbo 67 Mustang that arrived with the typical Eleanor body kit. It has been undergoing a transformation of sorts, and one of my ideas was to get rid of the quarter window scoops and replace them with fuel and oil fillers since the car is running a dry sump in the back and a 35 gallon fuel cell that is so tall it can only be fed from the sail panel. The owner wanted to retain the original Shelby quarter scoops though, so I started playing around with the idea on my car. Here is what unfolded. The initial version was the most simplistic and was a straight recessed panel, but that left too much empty space that needed to be filled with something. Since I've always one of the more iconic features on the fastback were its louvers I decided to try and add some. After playing with spacing, and the inclusion of the racing style filler that appeared on the Cobra, this is what I ended up with. http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...ps524dcff5.jpg http://s366.photobucket.com/user/69M...tml?sort=3&o=6 I still wasn't quite happy with it though because the filler still looked tacked on so I decided to recess it with notches around the hinges so it looked more like it belonged. http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...psbed17f18.jpg http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...psc8839cc3.jpg http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...ps087153be.jpg http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...ps317a12c6.jpg Now to figure out how to make a little stainless trim ring that matches with drip rail moldings... |
Looks good, Matt. I like the idea of putting the louvers and gas filler together.
|
Do you have a 2 gas tanks? To me, it looks like shots of both sides of the car.
|
Quote:
Quote:
You know what I think of your quarter window fillers already but to be official.:thumbsup: Mimicking the feel of the original louvers is a great idea. Can't wait to see what you come up with for the stainless trim. To date the build is Blue Oval approved.:lmao: :popcorn2: Quote:
:cheers: |
Quote:
If the engine is grossly lacking everything that makes it really fast, I can always pull it out in a couple years to sleeve the block, bore it out, and toss in super light rotating assembly with a billet crank and better rods and pistons. :G-Dub: |
Quote:
:cheers: |
Quote:
Speaking of gauges, I need to give Speed Hut a call. I want some gauges very similar to yours, except I want a yellow tach that reads 7500 rpm at 12 o'clock. :D See, your recycling of the junkyard has been useful both to me and Speed Hut. Oh, and I think the dry sump must have been in regards to the customer's car. the Boss 302 engine uses a huge road race wet sump. I haven't heard of poor oiling on the Coyote motors like I've heard about on LSs. I know the Grand am Mustangs are still running wet sumps so they must not be too bad. |
Matt, did you see Maier just came out with flared front fenders for 65-66 that fit 315's? :idea:
:D Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know Rob will not approve on behalf of the Blue Oval camp unless they are a 345 at a minimum. :twak: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Very cool build....subscribed!!
|
Congrats at Optima! you placed well, considering all the big names you were up against!
|
Quote:
|
Great perspective Matt. Congratulations on your performance.
|
Quote:
After a last min thrash to fix some gremlins you drove 325 + mi in the actual car you were competing in. The misshap with your steering rack on Friday may have fazed you when you ran your hot lap but you were able to pull it together and put a couple of solid performances together on the autox and start stop. You showed a lot of composure. And when it was all done your drove your car 325 miles home. Oh and I would have gave your camaro more than one point for design.:headscratch: I think it was Todd who said "Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." Or maybe it was Confucius, I get those two confused.:lmao: :lmao: :cheers: |
Congrats Matt. :thumbsup:
And I think I agree with what Todd, Rob and Confucius all said about you. :confused59: |
:lol:
|
Quote:
|
so when are you going to be back on this?
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net