Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Project Updates (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Camaro XV (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=39584)

frojoe 02-06-2015 12:10 PM

Maybe this thread pretty quickly went in a massively-wayward and obscurely technical direction, hence the silence from Mark, since he's likely moved on to 1 or 2 other new main/side projects....

Just a thought.

Roberts68 02-06-2015 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frojoe (Post 593410)
Maybe this thread pretty quickly went in a massively-wayward and obscurely technical direction, hence the silence from Mark, since he's likely moved on to 1 or 2 other new main/side projects....

Just a thought.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAP (Post 593408)
The conundrum we always face with these technical interchanges is that only discussions within a broad public-domain definition can be occur. As soon as we get into something that's truly technically intriguing, IP corporate concerns shut down any further discourse. (The dark side of engineering that they never told us about at MIT.)

If I'm right about this, then we won't be hearing back from Mark in this thread again. Of course, I hope I'm wrong about this.

Best,
MAP

MAP, you might start a new thread in an appropriate subforum for your discussion, see what develops.

If it feels like the tangents you present are worthy of in depth discussion yet detract from a thread... Or drive off the original poster then that is likely the case and worthy of reconsidering.

That doesn't necessarily mean they won't be welcome discussions in their own right.

MAP 02-06-2015 01:50 PM

Thanks,

Too bad I can't go back in time and un-do those posts because it was never my intention to derail this thread - in fact, quite the opposite - the intention was to help drive it forward. Apologies again to Mark and everyone for having inadvertently done so. In retrospect, in our company too, it's lockdown mode when someone outside ventures into IP...

However, maybe in some small way those posts will stimulate thought for progress.

Best,
MAP

Stielow 02-06-2015 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAP (Post 593427)
Thanks,

Too bad I can't go back in time and un-do those posts because it was never my intention to derail this thread - in fact, quite the opposite - the intention was to help drive it forward. Apologies again to Mark and everyone for having inadvertently done so. In retrospect, in our company too, it's lockdown mode when someone outside ventures into IP...

However, maybe in some small way those posts will stimulate thought for progress.

Best,
MAP

MAP

A mid engine car would be faster. If I put my engine in a AWD mid engine car it would be faster. If I put my engine in a ZR-1 it would be faster. Just simple physics.

New or mid engine cars have better areo, CG, weight distribution.....

I'm not sure what question your asking.

Mark

syborg tt 02-06-2015 03:46 PM

Hi Mark,

Okay since where talking all this stuff that is way over my knowledge base. What are you thoughts on the new front wheel drive race car that just built and are taking to Le Mans.

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/02/02/n...-wec-official/

ps - Sorry for the Thread Hi-Jack

Stielow 02-06-2015 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by syborg tt (Post 593444)
Hi Mark,

Okay since where talking all this stuff that is way over my knowledge base. What are you thoughts on the new front wheel drive race car that just built and are taking to Le Mans.

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/02/02/n...-wec-official/

ps - Sorry for the Thread Hi-Jack

They did a good job the reading the rule book.

dontlifttoshift 02-06-2015 07:14 PM

Mark, where did you hide the GPS antenna for the Dash2? Did you have any problems getting GPS lock with that location?

Thanks!

MAP 02-06-2015 10:54 PM

Mark,

I'm very relieved and pleased to see that I was in fact wrong. I wasn't really asking any question, but just suggesting, by highlighting the physics, that given all of the ambitious and impressive things you've already done with Camaros, that rather than switch to a platform better suited to mid-engine, you might in fact try the close-to-impossible and make a 1st-gen Camaro that's mid-engine.

Thanks,
MAP

Vince@Meanstreets 02-06-2015 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAP (Post 593495)
Mark,

I'm very relieved and pleased to see that I was in fact wrong. I wasn't really asking any question, but just suggesting, by highlighting the physics, that given all of the ambitious and impressive things you've already done with Camaros, that rather than switch to a platform better suited to mid-engine, you might in fact try the close-to-impossible and make a 1st-gen Camaro that's mid-engine.

Thanks,
MAP

I would not say that. impractical sure

Sieg 02-06-2015 11:04 PM

Corvaro :secret:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net