Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Project Updates (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   1969 Torino (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=10645)

DOOM 10-06-2013 05:27 PM

Rob I love the rendering! I gotta say it looks badazz!!!!!!!!! I agree with Greg put that FE on the hood! Man these guys give you alot of sh!t but they love you!:grouphug:

Vegas69 10-06-2013 08:34 PM

Why not put the real cubic inches on the hood?

FETorino 10-06-2013 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DOOM (Post 508898)
Rob I love the rendering! I gotta say it looks badazz!!!!!!!!! I agree with Greg put that FE on the hood! Man these guys give you alot of sh!t but they love you!:grouphug:

Thanks Mario. I think the picture at stance looks pretty dam close to that rendering. So step one is done:yes:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 508941)
Why not put the real cubic inches on the hood?


Just like the cars back in the day it is trying to pay homage to. The rules and the writing on the hood said one thing and what was running may have been something different.:lmao:

There never was a 496 CI grand national car. It's just a personal preference but I never have been a fan of updating the stock emblems with the new #s when using emblems. In my case the hood lettering is analogous to a factory emblem and I don't want to change it.

:cheers:

Flash68 10-07-2013 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 508950)
I think the picture at stance looks pretty dam close to that rendering.

So I guess there was a good reason there was no 3/4 view REAR rendering done. :peepwall:

Vegas69 10-07-2013 07:22 AM

I get it now, when you lose to a Chevy they'll think you only have 427 cubes. :D

Matt@BOS 10-07-2013 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 508968)
So I guess there was a good reason there was no 3/4 view REAR rendering done. :peepwall:

It's probably because it costs extra to have something rendered that is so big it only fits on 11x17.

GregWeld 10-07-2013 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt.A (Post 509009)
It's probably because it costs extra to have something rendered that is so big it only fits on 11x17.




I think what you meant to say was that there wasn't enough butcher paper on a roll....

FETorino 10-07-2013 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 508999)
I get it now, when you lose to a Chevy they'll think you only have 427 cubes. :D

I'm just following your lead since all ZL1s were hydraulic roller and 489ci:lmao:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...pse7107567.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 508968)
So I guess there was a good reason there was no 3/4 view REAR rendering done. :peepwall:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt.A (Post 509009)
It's probably because it costs extra to have something rendered that is so big it only fits on 11x17.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 509029)
I think what you meant to say was that there wasn't enough butcher paper on a roll....

Don't worry, I contacted Fathead wall art and they said they could do a 3/4 rear view. They'll be ready for you guys in time for Christmas.:)

:cheers:

Vegas69 10-07-2013 08:20 PM

You got me...:waveflag: :lol:

FETorino 10-07-2013 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 509168)
You got me...:waveflag: :lol:

Or I'm copying you:D

:happy23:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net