Lateral-g Forums - 69 Camaro subframe channel to lower

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)

- Chassis and Suspension (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=38)

- - 69 Camaro subframe channel to lower (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=30678)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 332597)

Buy yourself a Corvette and save 100k. :unibrow:

LOL, no kiddin'!! What can I say. I'm stubborn as a mule!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 332597)

Buy yourself a Corvette and save 100k. :unibrow:

If I were an 80 year old man and wasn't getting laid anymore I might, until then this car will be badass-and holy crap if I had a 100g the world would be in trouble.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 332601)

Brings to mind a statement I even say to myself sometimes.

Just because you can... doesn't mean you should.

You can get these cars plenty low without all the hassle you're going to run into.

Your idea of low enough may not be my idea of low enough. The fact that so many of these rides these days have airride to get the stance they want is a travesty. Engineer it to be what you envision, build it that way. I love the stance of these with all the air out. Don't get me wrong I am a big supporter of airride as I have done it for years, but I want the stance without the air.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 332594)

I intend on channeling mine for phase 3 build. The nice thing about channeling is you will be able to keep suspension travel. I'm only doing 1 1/2". I'm going to raise the front radiator support mounts up, lower the mid mount, and fab for rear mount then hat channel it in. Depending on what steering set up you have you may have to customize. If your running a stock brake booster it may hit valve covers so you need to decide what your going to exchange that with and there are many options. The front fender wells will need to be cut where they meet the frame. Your hood will drop closer to your motor, LS might be OK. Your going to have to raise trans tunnel and may have to channel for exhaust system. Wait, it gets better, depending on tires, wheels, and backspace, you may have to stretch fenders and quarter panels. I want to keep my track width so thats where I'm headed. I probably left a couple of things out that have to do with firewall dropping but you get the idea.

I like this idea, what are your thoughts of welding the frame into the body structure? I will be putting in an LS motor as well, will not be using a stock style booster for brakes. Yea I realize the amount of work I'm talking about but to get what you envision is worth it in the end.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 69MSA (Post 332610)

What he said...

My car is pretty low. It has DSE's half-height bushings/mounts and that is about as much hassle as I would be willing to go through. If my car had huge wheels it would look just like Doug's. Which brings me to my next point, if you just want a killer stance Doug's car, which you can search for by the title "Apollo 13" proves that you don't need to go wild trying to move the subframe up. For non competitive events our cars both do fine. I don't notice the suspension bottoming out, or really have any other related problems. Basically the subframe height has never been an issue. Exhaust clearance, however, is the problem. And you're going to have problems unless you raise the floor, and if you do, you better pick out your seats, pedals, and steering column to accommodate you because you're likely going to have a lack of headroom.

Matt

I do love your car. Nice job. One of my biggest problems with the 69 imo looking at it from the side is the exhaust hanging low and the subframe hanging low. maybe a rocker extension may cover it up, but why not drop your suspension a couple inches without sacrificing travel or geometry and cure the issue at the same time. I have done bodydrops on trucks so modifying seats, exhaust, steering, pedals and dealing with headroom are all part of that. I am no expert but I am always thinking and trying to build things the way I envision them(maybe not for eveyone)

Personally, I fee air ride is the only way to go for a car in the weeds. That is if you want to drive it anywhere on city streets. It gives you the option to drive the car as low as you like and at a reasonable height for speed bumps, steep crossings, etc . I like your idea for a race car that needs very little ground clearance.

Thought I would include this picture of my truck, and I expect the "why would you do that" comments, but why wouldn't you is the real question. Full airride, four link with a watts link as well. This truck handles really well when it's off the ground of course.
http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n.../Roadster1.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 332803)

I know what you mean, i have been drivin low for years and avoiding things. i will be building this with a happy medium, just throwin ideas around. Airride is great for many things but it is a huge pain in the a.

Quote:

Originally Posted by northwests (Post 332799)

I dont intend to weld frame to body structure at this point but you never really know until you get into the build. With the frame coming into the body and raising trans tunnel area it will be important to think about the structural integrity of the rest of the floor to avoid any issues down the road but it's definitely do-able. I say go for it.

We channeled my front frame on my cuda it it messed with alot of stuff.... Headers, exhaust pipe, trans tunnel, driveshaft, wheels etc etc etc..... And I have airride too!!!!
It definitely added a ton of work.... In the end it will be worth it I hope. Well see
A pro builder once told me that for every additional inch a customer wants to lower their car ( doing it right....without screwing with suspension geometry and travel) will add about $4k to the bill

It comes down to if it's worth it to YOU... In either time or $$