| Mkelcy |
07-17-2011 10:15 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by wmhjr
(Post 358516)
Pretty controversial subject with good reasons on both sides of the argument. I don't have a problem with a law allowing you to ride without a helmet so long as you sign a waiver that says that you and/or your family are personally liable for any resulting costs associated with a traumatic head injury, no matter what. No declaring bankruptcy, etc. And if you don't have the money or any assets to sell, you just don't get treatment. Then it's a real choice. I just think it's only fair. But that's just my opinion. Of course, when PA eliminated the legal requirement to wear helmets it cost me money personally right off the bat. My insurance company immediately dropped ALL motorcycle insurance in this state within 2 months for that reason. So, my premiums went up as I had to split up my insurance. I don't blame them either.
|
While I understand and agree with the underlying sentiment - what to the EMT's do when they arrive on site? Is there a national database of riders who have signed waivers? How do they confirm identity? Do you really want EMTs looking for picture ID or a helmet before they render services?
Let's say they render emergency aid and transport to a hospital where identity and waiver status can be confirmed - what do they do with the rider who's signed a waiver - dump him in the parking lot?
No, it's much easier to ticket for not wearing a helmet - and if certain states want to underwrite the costs of treating riders who refuse to protect themselves, I guess that's their choice. |
