![]() |
X2 ^^^
My car has a 670HP 427” and makes peak power at 6,900 rpm. I ran 3" exhaust with 2.5" tail pipes at first, and then switched to 3" tail pipes. After having tried both set ups… I would recommend 3” all the way for sure. I didn’t think the 2.5” would restrict it that much but when I made the switch… there was a noticeable difference up in the higher rpm range. The engine responded well with the larger diameter tail pipes. I don’t have numbers to back this up… just seat of the pants feel. Also, the 3” tail pipes sound better and have a deeper tone than the 2.5". |
No way I'd run a 2.5 inch exhaust on that engine with that power. I don't need science to tell me that. :D
|
Quote:
The rest of us have to rely on hard facts. :cheers: |
Gee ---- In the old days if we wanted max hp we uncorked the headers!
Seriously - how often do you need "max" hp on the street.... |
Quote:
Agree.... |
Quote:
:rules: |
Quote:
Next time I'll just post "I feel a 3" pipe will really wake that motor up" since that seems to be what you want.:lostmarbles: :action-smiley-027: :cheers: |
I'm not arguing with Rob --- he carries the GOLD Starbucks card and sadly -- Flashy -- you don't.
Coffee makes me FEEL like I have more HP and makes me rev more freely too! So I gotta go with my seat of the pants evaluation. Technically -- I think it's just the caffeine... |
BTW DAVE --- Have you ever walked SEMA with ROB and RON????
They go from booth to booth - never really seeing the killer cars or the hot chicks -- but man can they talk smack with the engineers! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
Quote:
Quote:
I'm calling BS and offer a pinhole camera photo of the #1 reason to go to SEMA last year as evidence of my focus. Don't hate me cuz I'm a multitasker. :cheers: http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps4292a6d4.jpg |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net