![]() |
BMR Torque Arm + 295/40/18
4 Attachment(s)
The 295s fit great with the BMR Torque Arm and I think even with the flatter wheel opening on your Camaro they would work if you look at how far inside the wheel lip the tires are tucked on my car. There's also good clearance before the tire would contact the rear of the inner wheel well on the inside. Early Firebirds don't have the seat belt bludge in the front of the inner wheel well but if your Camaro does a BFH should easily adjust for any needed clearance there.
|
Quote:
|
10 years on BMR
Stock rear end upgraded 31-spline axles, posi, KORE3 brakes, etc.
Stock Goodmark replacement tank... 3" exhaust cleared everything... 2.5" tailpipes would be even better/easier. I LOVE the ride with the BMR torque arm and their uppers/lowers and sway bar up front! I have AFCO coilovers front and rear... the ride is very compliant and comfortable, yet also very solid with great traction and cornering. I think it's the best of everything honestly! You'll find other threads where the torque arm and 3/4-links are compared and for a dual purpose street/track car most all agree that a torque arm is the way to go... My 2 cents. HTH |
vstol, thank you and your family for service and sacrifice.
I like the direction of your build and I have one suggestion or actually more of a pet peeve of mine would be to complete the rest of the front RS "split bumper" front end (U+L headers and endura nose and grills) or go back to a std front bumper. I guess it was bought like this, good looking car otherwise, I guess I'm a bit of a purist |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
KORE3 Brakes
One call to Tobin at KORE3 and you'll be set!
I've been running his manual C5/C6 hybrid setup front and rear with a Wilwood master cylinder. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net