![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
You've been driving that Shelby so you know those Fords run just fine.:D I still say build an old school windsor based motor using a stock Ford CPU and quarterhorse tuning software. Lots of trackable power to be had for cheap. |
Quote:
How much would a Windsor with EFI run me? I have noknowledge about old Ford motors, and while the thought of putting one in has crossed my mind, I just know more about mod motors, and wouldn't hesitate to take the car back to RTTH with a Coyote in it, knowing that I could knock down 25mpg+ and not have to worry about blowing anything up on the track. Matt |
I really think you will regret building the same type of car you have already. Take what you've learned and apply it to this one.:unibrow: Specifically, less maintenence and more reliability.
|
Quote:
Less maintenance, and more reliability? Why do you think I decided to build a Ford this time :unibrow: I've been thinking about how to make a better, faster car for a while now. I think our definitions of better and faster are going in completely different directions though. I doubt I'll be able to make this thing weigh more than 3100lbs. Right off the bat it should have a 400lb weight advantage. the car is flared 2.5." It's going to have more front tire (probably a 295) and a little less rear tire (295-315). Horsepower is a lot of fun, but I don't know that I'll need much more than 500 in this car. If I do add a blower (650ish) the car should still be fairly light. I'd like to run a dry sump and all kinds of oil coolers. I'm going to open up some quarter scoops to house those things. They'll probably just look cool, but maybe I'll drive fast enough, and long enough to take advantage of them. Honestly, I wanted to just throw together a solid, relatively light car to have fun with, but I do tend to obsess over design elements I just couldn't make the car ugly. I don't really care about shiny paint, but since it is kind of a BOS car it will probably get that eventually. I doubt it will get too many rock chips since it will be ahead of the Camaros, and almost all Pro Touring cars are Camaros :lol: Matt |
I like your mind set on this one.
|
Quote:
Seriously the plan sounds tough to argue with man. And I like to argue. |
Matt have you considered this front setup from the Roadster Shop?
http://www.roadstershop.com/products...nsion-ifs-form Or http://www.roadstershop.com/products...-subframe-form They seem to look really nice and cost is in line with the other setups out there. |
Quote:
I'm trying to keep things simple. I swear. I'd like to buy something that provides plenty of adjustment, and keeps added weight to a minimum, which is one of the really promising aspects of DSE front setup, which is made out of (mostly) aluminum. I also just remembered Agent 47 Racing. I like their stuff too. It isn't too over the top, looks like it installs easily, and gets the job done too. http://www.agentfortyseven.com/harbinger/index.html# So many choices now :willy: Matt |
Quote:
That DSE Stang sure is kickin some butt since it came out. |
Quote:
Speaking of options, JME is another company that makes Mustang parts, and also happens to be fairly local to me: http://www.jmeenterprises.com/JME%20...spension.shtml Julio's stuff is cool as well, but there is now way I'm paying 10k+ for front suspension after adding in the cost of shocks and springs. I could probably build and race a Fox body car for that much. Oh, and about DSE's Mustang, it has been kicking ass on small 340 treadwear tires. Something must be working there. Matt |
Quote:
What about Griggs racing? They have been racing Mustangs new and old for a long time. Take a look at their GR 350 stuff. http://www.griggsracing.com/ |
Quote:
Matt Ugh... I'm never going to make up my mind! |
Quote:
Really all the options mentioned are good. Just a matter of personal preference...:thumbsup: |
|
Quote:
About DSE: Pricing should be up in the next week or two, everything should be ready to ship sometime in July. If it does come out to 6 or 7k with remote canister shocks, that is about what I budgeted. Damn Ron, we could still buy a Fox body. |
Matt it is very easy to spend other guys money :lol:
Oh and I think I may have to change my vote, that DSE setup does look very impressive! As you said any of the above mentioned will most likely get you up front, now staying there that is a different matter :thumbsup: |
The DSE stuff looks pretty nice and they are beating on it at tracks everywhere to prove it works.
I know I mentioned Griggs but my vote would be Roadster shop or DSE. My experience with the RS has been great so far. From what I've heard DSE is also a great family vendor to deal with. Dealing with a vendor who is accessible and willing to stand by their stuff is probably the most important piece. It looks like the DSE stuff is designed to sandwich the stock subframe, is that what I'm seeing? If that is the case I guess the condition of your front frame structure may be a deciding factor. If it is in really good shape then maybe the DSE is the right choice. If it is haggered then maybe the RS complete front end makes the most sense. |
Lat-G like forum for Mustangs?
I'm curious, with all of this talk on a Mustang project. Is there any site, similar to Lat-G or PT.com for the Ford guys? Not that I want to promote a different site, but it seems that so few Mustang projects are posted here, and I have to believe that there is a similar contingent of Ford guys as these sites seem to be mostly GM based...
|
Quote:
Matt I think you should sell those seats to help finance your subframe. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
When you say GM you mean LS don't you? Even your Pontiac doesn't have Pontiac power. Some of the Ford on here aren't Fords they have LS power. Anyway when you pick that Ford someone here will know where to get the info you ned to build it.:D |
Quote:
There are a few guys holding down the fort with some SBC and BBC power still. But yes, it's an LS-world in the majority I think. And I have 600HP of LS-goodness waiting to be installed!!! :woot: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am also a die hard Ford guy! :thumbsup: |
Quote:
Matt |
Hmm, I need to update my link then. Yep, the red car had an SBC, but I've since sold that car and the engine (separately, the engine went to a friend building a hot rod), and have purchased the blue one in my avatar. It is a Formula with (currently) a Pontiac 400. :)
Since I haven't built an LS car yet, I'm definitely going that route. But I definitely appreciate the potential those 'other' engines have... And Matt, sorry about the hijack. ;) |
Nice Looking Build Matt! :thumbsup:
|
Quote:
|
based upon what I know about pricing on the new sub, pricing is similar to Chevy II sub. Expect just under $7500 retail on bare sub with canister shocks. Actual pricing is being released at Columbus. You know you want to go DSE.:yes:
|
Quote:
Mike, I do want to go DSE! I think Kyle and Stacy would like me to go DSE, and I'm sure Dick would be happy if I ordered all those parts too :lol: Here's the latest photo of my handy work. It's amazing what some Fibral and a skim coat of filler can do. http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...A/IMAG0524.jpg Matt |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's not too late to buy the drivetrain from the Ford GT though, the owner only wanted 15k for it complete, from dry sump to Ricardo transaxle. Just get rid of your back seat. I'm sure the guys at the Roadster shop can make it work. You should do it. You would be my hero. Matt |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
My little retro mil will have more hp and weight less than that supercharged mod motor.:D I'm going to see if I can find some money to put that GT drivetrain in a 1st gen. Now that would be cool. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Got some work done on the passenger side quarter. I'm definitely going to have to do the driver side one this way too :lol:
After my first attempt I learned that it would be much easier to fit if I kept all of the edges of the original panel in place. Pulling and stretching the face of the panel while also trying to keep the edges in place before spot welding wasn't the greatest idea. I guess you could say I was asking that quarter skin to do too many things at once. This time around I made sure to give my self a reasonable amount of overlap that I could probably trim away later if need be. http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...A/IMAG0534.jpg The first problem I ran into was getting the wheel opening to line up and have the right curvature. Two things that weren't good happened. One, I found out that pulling everything out just increased the radius and upset the arc of the wheel opening to the point where nothing lined up. Second, the '65's quarters are pretty straight up and down, and moving the the upper section of the wheel arch out was not pretty. Essentially, it just swiveled up, and started to look concave. You can see in the picture below that the sides stick out more than the top. I managed to fix this by relief cutting the inner lip, and massaging things until I got the shape I wanted. I also slid the middle piece of the quarter down to close some of the gap that I'd created. http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...A/IMAG0540.jpg With the added width of the new quarter I've got room for brake ducts, or diff and trans coolers, or something... [IMG]http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/oo103/69MSA /IMAG0542.jpg[/IMG] Finally it is starting take on a little more shape. It is taking on more of a '69 Camaro side profile, and I don't think that's a bad thing :unibrow: http://i366.photobucket.com/albums/o...A/IMAG0548.jpg Matt |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net