Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Shop & Equipment (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   welding stainless steel exhaust (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=38680)

frankv11 01-06-2013 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 456107)
These guys supply the BELLOWS style with an internal slip joint for smoothness....



http://www.spdexhaust.com/pdfs/AccPDFs/Bellows.pdf

Those are exactly what I'm looking to buy, with interior sleeve / directional. I could be wrong but the ones that I'm replacing don't seem like they would be compression friendly. I need some that will compress when exhaust stretches out from its natural state to eliminate some of the stress , tension , binding.

I'm doing a bit of research on how much it will actually stretch. The only thing I'm missing is the over all running temperature of the exhaust system.

GregWeld 01-06-2013 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frankv11 (Post 456133)
Those are exactly what I'm looking to buy, with interior sleeve / directional. I could be wrong but the ones that I'm replacing don't seem like they would be compression friendly. I need some that will compress when exhaust stretches out from its natural state to eliminate some of the stress , tension , binding.

I'm doing a bit of research on how much it will actually stretch. The only thing I'm missing is the over all running temperature of the exhaust system.

The exhaust on my short little '32 ford grows an inch!

frankv11 01-07-2013 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 456135)
The exhaust on my short little '32 ford grows an inch!

mine is defenitly going to grow a lot more than one inch...LOL

snappytravis 01-07-2013 08:40 PM

I was recently thinking of stainless exhaust for my 69 camaro. After reading throught this thread I am having second thoughts, What about using regular steel exhaust then having powder coated?

preston 01-17-2013 01:30 PM

Yeah I'm surprised the brain trust here is down on Stainless exhaust. I built many custom steel exhausts and its expensive to coat and my experience with the local coater down there in Auburn hasn't been that great durability wise (scratches then rusts). I finally built a full SS exhaust for my rig and was so much happier with the appearance and performance. I constantly change things so I appreciate being able to cut apart the exhaust and re-weld it without having to get it recoated. I do have a flex joint and plenty of very flexible hangers. I must be the really odd man out because I build my turbo headers from steel and my exhaust from SS and haven't had a problem with either and the car has been tracked several times.

Anyway, my question is back to welding SS - I've read many times your welds/metal should be silver or gold colored or at least shiny when done and that gray is bad. Well most of my welds ended up gray - its been a while since I've welded SS so maybe it would work out better now but I'm having a hard time figuring out what I was doing wrong. I think the gray is too much heat ? But I work that pedal up and down and only use enough heat to do the job, obvioulsy if you use too much you blow through and not enough is easy enough to see. This was mostly on 3" exhaust without backpurging, but including many v-band flanges and such where there was no open air backside. TIG welding using .063 stick on .063 wall thickness runnnig pure Argon (or whatever the standard TIG mix is) and probably 65-75 amps at full throttle on my Lincoln square wave.

Any tips on what I'm doing wrong ?
BTW I've never had any SS weld crack although I never grind them down.

dontlifttoshift 01-17-2013 03:08 PM

My experience is too much heat makes it gray and chalky. 65 to 75 amps sounds about right but I very rarely hit wide open, I don't back purge exhaust either unless it is being polished. It's not just the amount of heat but how long you put the heat in. That's why fitup is so important, if you are trying to "bridge" a gap that requires some time and that can burn the color out of it. That's been my experience.

Here's a secret, I don't even use filler rod on the seams of unpolished exhaust. SShhh.....the welding nazis get mad when they hear that, but that's the way I do it and I have never had a problem.


Headers are another story, I always backpurge.......well not really. I use a local shop that welds sanitary stuff all day, everyday, they do it so cheap its not worth my time. Same with polished exhaust, I tack it and drop it off, and it comes back polished

preston 01-17-2013 03:13 PM

Thanks for the tips. My TIG welding has come a long ways since I last did SS so maybe it will come out better next time. I mostly do aluminum but lately I have been doing alot of bodywork and I have been having success fusion welding 20 awg steel which makes me absolutely giddy. So yeah I would probably do a better job on moving quicklythat was probably my issue, spending too much time in one spot. I have found you are better off leaving a bad bead or void in your wake in order to keep the heat moving and going back and melting/fixing rather than lingering and trying to fix it then.
Not sure I would trust fusion welded exhaust pipes though, need the extra strength there. On body patches not so much.

dontlifttoshift 01-18-2013 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by preston (Post 458692)
Not sure I would trust fusion welded exhaust pipes though, need the extra strength there. On body patches not so much.

You got that backwards, ridiculously expensive paint jobs go on the body work.:)

You have built the exhaust so you know, Have you tacked one joint together and then had to take it apart? 4 good tacks and you have a hell of a time getting it apart.

A 3" tube has over 9" of weld holding it together at each seam. Again, fit up is key. A perfectly fitup joint will fusion weld with no problem. The sanitary guys have automatic welders as well. There are two styles, one that spins the pipe and one that spins the tungsten around the pipe, neither one uses filler of any kind.

Another thing that will make it gray and chalky is dirty tungsten or getting a contaminant in the weld.

funcars 01-20-2013 09:33 AM

Coeff of thermal expansions for those who like specs: - 304 11x10E-6 in/in/deg F, 321 11.4x10E-6, 316L 10.8x10E-6, low carbon steel 6.3x10E-6

ccracin 01-20-2013 05:41 PM

You also must remember that the tubing gets cooler the further back you go. It becomes a fun calculation! :headscratch:

frankv11 01-24-2013 08:41 AM

got some info
http://www.unisource-mfg.com/images/...Basic_Info.pdf

The WidowMaker 03-14-2013 11:19 AM

fusion welded the 304 on my 70 but dont have a motor yet. did the same for my silverado and im at a year with no issues. i agree that a few tacks were murder to take apart. not so much for a mig since its more difficult to get the heat with a tack.

64pontiac 03-27-2013 08:00 PM

I haven't seem to have had the "growing" issues as much as some of you.....I am sure at some point I will have to deal with it though.

All of our stuff runs flex joints and the "snapper" grommets that were seen in the pics a bit back. But I mount them bolted to another bracket.

Also, I have put some serious heat into the exhaust via super and turbo charging, and I have yet to have my stainless stuff get grey like the pic of Blu Ballz exhaust.....I know he tracks it, but the crossover section there is a bit back from the collectors....ours only goes gold/purple. Is this just exterior contamination like oil that makes it go overheat grey like that? Maybe that has to do with the cracking.

I have use fusion on stainless exhaust joints too, it looks amazing. I havent been experiencing the sugaring issues that much, I have only purges on header tubes, not our exhaust systems.

What tungstens are you guys using? On 16 gauge stainless I am only running 30 amps max to get a nice bead. I have never had to put 60 amp into stainless exhaust unless I am adding an 1/8 inch thick bracket or muffler/flex joint lap welds. I guess its all in the welder operator!

Good info in here. I do believe you on the exhaust growing Greg, just haven't experienced it myself.

GregWeld 03-27-2013 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 64pontiac (Post 472580)
Good info in here. I do believe you on the exhaust growing Greg, just haven't experienced it myself.



My little '32 doesn't have any flex joints in it... and that's the problem with that particular system. If it did -- it would have been fine.


The "old trick" I've used to figure where the crossover goes -- spray some paint on the exhaust after the collector --- from there back about 18" ---- Run the system -- and put the crossover where the paint 'boiled'. But that was before the days of "X" pipes. And is probably about as scientific as spitting.

jst8a5.0 05-03-2013 09:19 PM

geez i have built a ton of ss systems and i have only had one turbo manifold crack but it was for a ton of reasons working against the manifold itself such as wheel hop, no flex coupler, the car bottomed out a few good times, heavy turbo was hung directly off the manifold with no support, etc....

parsonsj 09-13-2013 10:02 PM

Love this discussion!

Quote:

Originally Posted by funcars
Coeff of thermal expansions for those who like specs: - 304 11x10E-6 in/in/deg F, 321 11.4x10E-6, 316L 10.8x10E-6, low carbon steel 6.3x10E-6

That's the data we need. SS grows a bit less than twice as much as mild steel, and a typical SS exhaust will grow about 0.3 to 0.4 inches, given 800 degree temps at the collector, 400 at the muffler, and 200 at the tail pipe. More heat: more growth, more length: more growth, etc.

I've been fusion-welding SS exhaust since I saw the Stainless Works welders doing it. I spend a lot of time on fit-up, de-burr all weld edges, and clean the metal with acetone before welding. I use 35-40 amps on 16g, and back-purge everything.

Because SS moves so much during welding, I fully weld the exhaust tubes as I go. Tacking the whole thing and then fully welding makes it difficult to keep everything where you want it. Plus you get to do some of the early welds without having 6 feet of tube rolling around while you weld.

toddoky 09-17-2013 04:12 AM

All of the issues discussed here is why I don't use 304 for building exhaust systems; it is an un-stabilized austenitic grade of stainless that is not recommended for use in high temperature applications (850 degree F. use temp threshold). If you need increased high-temperature strength beyond what mild steel provides, 321 and 347 are the stabilized grades that can provide it by design. 304 became the poor-mans stainless exhaust material due to its availability and affordable price (relative to 321 and 347) and the fact that its the only lower-cost option most people think they have besides using 409ss. If you want to use an affordable stainless material that is designed for use in a high-temp environment with better corrosion resistance than 304 in cyclic high-temp applications (i.e. exhaust systems) look at the stabilized 2nd-generation ferritic grade 439. It has the same 18 percent chromium content that 304 has (409 has 11.5 percent)without the nickel content, which is the real price driver of the austenitic grades. I've used it to build headers and exhaust systems for 15 years without any issues and highly recommend it. Its coefficient of thermal expansion is closer to mild steel than it is to 304. The trouble with using it is in finding it in U/J-bend form but you can find them in many different tube diameters from Bassani Manufacturing in Anaheim, Ca.

Vince@Meanstreets 09-17-2013 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toddoky (Post 505396)
All of the issues discussed here is why I don't use 304 for building exhaust systems; it is an un-stabilized austenitic grade of stainless that is not recommended for use in high temperature applications (850 degree F. use temp threshold). If you need increased high-temperature strength beyond what mild steel provides, 321 and 347 are the stabilized grades that can provide it by design. 304 became the poor-mans stainless exhaust material due to its availability and affordable price (relative to 321 and 347) and the fact that its the only lower-cost option most people think they have besides using 409ss. If you want to use an affordable stainless material that is designed for use in a high-temp environment with better corrosion resistance than 304 in cyclic high-temp applications (i.e. exhaust systems) look at the stabilized 2nd-generation ferritic grade 439. It has the same 18 percent chromium content that 304 has (409 has 11.5 percent)without the nickel content, which is the real price driver of the austenitic grades. I've used it to build headers and exhaust systems for 15 years without any issues and highly recommend it. Its coefficient of thermal expansion is closer to mild steel than it is to 304. The trouble with using it is in finding it in U/J-bend form but you can find them in many different tube diameters from Bassani Manufacturing in Anaheim, Ca.

and because average people don't know about alternatives...its become an industry standard.

What is the cost difference and what filler is used with it?

toddoky 09-17-2013 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab (Post 505417)
and because average people don't know about alternatives...its become an industry standard.

What is the cost difference and what filler is used with it?


In terms of typical coil prices, it runs about 30-35% less than 304 on the market. When it comes to U-bend prices I haven't shopped 304 U-bends recently to be able to compare but was absolutely floored the last time I saw the prices for single 304 U-bends from the typical outlets...you'd think the stuff was made of gold instead of stainless steel. You could make an easy comparison by calling Bassani and asking for a price for a common U-bend size, such as 2-1/2 on a 4" radius and then shop prices for the same in 304 from the known suppliers of 304 U-bends (the list is too long to mention). Once you factor in the superior cyclic high temp corrosion properties of 439 and its much lower coefficient of thermal expansion, it's a no-brainer for me even if it was the same price as 304. The only place I wouldn't recommend it is when you need the increase in high temperature strength that the austenitic grades provide (i.e. hot side turbo plumbing on a competition vehicle), but in that case I would skip over 304 and go right to 321 or 347 as they are not subject to stress corrosion cracking like 304 is. 439 can be autogeneously welded (no filler rod) or be welded to itself with a matching 439 filler wire (if you can find it locally) or the common 308L austenitic filler wire. You can weld it to 304ss or low carbon steels by using 309L filler wire, which is the go-to stardard for dissimilar metal welds of this type.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net