![]() |
autorad
Steve- are they going to put vibration isolators on the Setrab?
That's a good looking piece. |
Power guesses? Hmmmmmm...need more specs (too lazy to surf the old posts at this point). My spider-senses tell me the driver is going to need to be retuned as well haha.
|
Quote:
Quote:
461 cubic inches 11.5:1 compression Lunati 4.250 stroke crank I-beam 6.125 rods (609 grams) Wiseco pistons Mast Motorsports 12-degree big bore rec port heads FAST 102mm LS3 intake RHS race block, standard deck, raised cam - 6-bolt Mike Norris ported LS2 TBW throttle body And a bunch of other stuff that don't make power. It will most likely make more than I need.. so I'm not going to be able to just flat foot it like I did before. I'm thinking I'm also going to have to run short autocrosses like Goodguys in second gear. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Since he was welding the tabs on for the mounts I thought I would have him bend the lines up front since he can bend stuff that big. It was more of a time saver since he's a few miles away and you're.. well.. farther. lol The plan is to get her running and then take her to you for the gas tank trunk lines and a couple very hard lines in the engine bay. You really need to move down to Orange County.. :yes: |
I bet it makes North of 700hp and 640-650lbft easy. Why a 114lsa with 11.5:1?
|
Quote:
No! No! No! I think you need to move to the S.F.V. Besides how many times do you go and see Cris at J.C.G. He's even further:lol: |
Quote:
And yea, driving to JCG is a nightmare.. LA sucks so bad. Took me three hours last time and he's only 90 miles away. My new rule is to try and only go there on weekends :) The fuel/vent lines in my trunk need your assitance badly.. |
Quote:
In the end I'm going to end up with more power than I really need so I erred on the side of idle and drivability. For compression I was really shooting for 11.1 or 11.2 to one, but this is how it's working out with the pistons and the 72cc Mast heads. We might adjust it down a touch with the head gasket, but 11.5:1 isn't high, even for out crappy CA pump gas. Horace at Mast was thinking it would be pushing 700hp.. now I just need to be able to hook it up. Also, while 700 is a good "magazine number" I would be happy with 650-670hp and a bad ass super flat torque curve. |
I agree, we are both pushing our chassis's to the max. I felt like my 491/497 at the tires was really managable across the board. I have similar expectations. 650-675hp and 625 ftlbs. Your making a vast improvment in your low end torque with identical stroke to me. I was able to hook up that 497 at 3800 with R888's in second gear matted during autocross. I felt it was about the limit however. A little loose but biting hard. On 200 tread wear tires I'm not to sure. You're going to gain some pull out of those slow corners and I'm going to gain 500-700 rpm to avoid shifting into 3rd until 85 or so. We'll put all that power to use on the road course for sure. :thumbsup: Crazy you can run 11.5:1 on a 114 with 91 octane. Do you run a knock sensor? I'd error on the side caution. Compression doesn't gain that much power.
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net