Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Engine (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   69 Camaro, Motor Mount/ LS1 (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=16326)

Vegas69 09-06-2008 12:14 AM

302/350 mounts are the worst if you are trying to gain clearance. They put the engine the lowest in the chassis. 307/327 mounts will gain you 3/8 up clearance. Moroso makes motor mount shims...not sure if they will work on a ls.http://moroso.com/catalog/categorydi...?catcode=28100

Rybar 09-06-2008 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigtyme1
Tony, Its getting better. what kind of header gaskets did you use?

Use the stock GM gaskets. :yes:

Nice job gaining the clearance. :thumbsup:

bigtyme1 09-06-2008 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 164552)
302/350 mounts are the worst if you are trying to gain clearance. They put the engine the lowest in the chassis. 307/327 mounts will gain you 3/8 up clearance. Moroso makes motor mount shims...not sure if they will work on a ls.http://moroso.com/catalog/categorydi...?catcode=28100

I Used the same mounts you did but I think the difference is you did not use a stock steering box. The 307 mounts are higher on the passenger side but they tilt the motor over to much to the driver side. Buy using the 302 mounts I was able to get the motor level again and picked up the clearence I needed. I also used the 302 engine mounts which are much thicker buy about 1/2 inch. next time I will use these.http://www.brphotrods.com/NEW First gen LS1 kit.html
It was just to late and running low on the budget.

Vegas69 09-06-2008 08:46 AM

I guess I didn't notice it moved anywhere but down when I swapped mine out. Not having the steering box in the way sure makes life easier. The are definitely thicker and more suited for our applications:thumbsup:

Moose 09-07-2008 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigtyme1 (Post 164564)
next time I will use these.http://www.brphotrods.com/NEW First gen LS1 kit.html
It was just to late and running low on the budget.

so you think this is the kit to go with? I havent bought anything yet..

bigtyme1 09-07-2008 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moose (Post 164666)
so you think this is the kit to go with? I havent bought anything yet..

call them and get the measurements, but I think they are going to be much easier to work with.

WILWAXU 09-07-2008 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moose (Post 164666)
so you think this is the kit to go with? I havent bought anything yet..

Mike, the BRP setup would work. It places the motor more forward and higher in the chassis than most the other more conventional setups you see here.

bigtyme1 09-07-2008 03:31 PM

If I did it all over again I would go with BRP.

Moose 09-08-2008 08:37 AM

The only thing about the brp is the height.. I'm running a victor jr fule injected intake, so I'm a little concerned with hood clearance.. Should be ok but not sure yet.

I also already have t56 crossmember from ATS for the 6 speed in the car.. I'll call brp and talke to them

WILWAXU 09-08-2008 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moose (Post 164775)
The only thing about the brp is the height.. I'm running a victor jr fule injected intake, so I'm a little concerned with hood clearance.. Should be ok but not sure yet.

I also already have t56 crossmember from ATS for the 6 speed in the car.. I'll call brp and talke to them

I had the same concerns. I plan to go with a blower in the future. So I ordered Autocraft pan/mounts and ATS trans mount.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net