![]() |
Nothing but good advice in this thread... someone should sticky this one.
|
Im hearing ya Frank... Some great points you make!!
To the OP you cant go wrong either way.. |
Quote:
Well said frank. you gotta ask yourself " what are your goals" and go from there. we all like the big dollar parts but in the end if your only building a crusier and occasional auto crosser then stick with stock. Now if I was building another 69 for myself would I do stock ...? No , DSE's frame is so damn nice !!!hehe . |
Quote:
|
Mary Pozzi throws down pretty well (real frickin well) w/moded stock frame.The George Follier's restored trans am mustang threw down pretty well at optima in nov.I be willing to bet that if Mark Donahue was still here he would make a lot of folks rethink the after market sub frames.Do what you feel comfortable with.A finished car is more fun than a car on jack stands.Good luck.:thumbsup:
|
Quote:
|
Besides what I said earlier, it occured to me one of the pluses going with an aftermarket subframe, and that's that all of the components were chosen to work together. While you can buy for example a hotchkis kit for the stock subframe that will probably be fine, but to get the best stock subframe possible, you tend to have to do a lot of reading and comparing to pick out parts.
|
Quote:
The springs rates that were used that day were 50 lbs heavier front and 100 lbs heavier rear than what is in the car now. The reason being is our car was completely untested 24 hours before the event so we had a bit of guess work for spring rates on our hands. We had plans to install the TigerCage and interior before the event so we sprung it a little heavy in preparation. Unfortunately, time did not allow these items to be installed or the springs to be changed before the event. Needless to say the springs that are in the car today are exactly what the customer will receive when they purchase a kit and it rides & handles much better now. My thinking is if it ran that good untuned just wait til it is dialed in. See you guys/gals in Vegas this weeked! :cheers: -J |
Great thread!!
lots of options no question about it, and i think Frank Or Vegas asked the most important ? "What are you using the car for?" that is the first ? that needs to be answered. then you can formulate a plan that makes sence from there. |
All excellent advice and I concur - decide what the goals and budget are and start there. You've started by asking the right questions for sure and I have been through the same process as have others. And I cannot help but watch Mary blast that 2nd gen of hers around the track with a stock sub and Hotchkis kit! Impressive and as someone here suggested, a lot of it is the driver. Not to hijack this great thread but in the spirit of helping another member....I see you are just north of me (I'm in San Diego) so IF you decide to go with modified stock, I have some unused first gen suspension that I'm probably not going to use. PM me if interested.
I have a really clean, welded and fresh powdercoated stock sub, some Del-a-lum bushed, powdercoated UCA & LCA's with QA1 coilovers, Hotchkis front bar and a set of Landrum rear springs and bushings. I also have a complete, brand new, soup-to-nuts Hotchkis TVR setup for a first gen including the UCA's, LCA's, 4 lowered springs, 2 sway bars and their Bilstein shocks for front and rear plus all the bushings, brackets and hardware. I think there's even a late model, rebuilt steering box here somewhere. These were going on other projects that I'm not going to get to anytime soon so I'm sure we could work something out if you decide to go that route. I don't think Frank will mind because I buy all my stuff from him anyway! But again, check on your goals and make a plan. It will change anyway but start with a plan LOL! G. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net