![]() |
I found some more info right here on this site. I don't know why it didn't show up when I searched the first time :
Quote:
|
All good basic information...
Personally, I would stay away from the "Adams" upside-down version in a high-horsepower, high traction car. Nothing wrong with the geometry, just remember that the lower links are pushing the car forward as well. Having them form the triangle can lead to the rear axle housing trying to do some weird things when you really apply some torque to it. |
not that I had any plans of doing anything like this, but what do you think ?
http://www.jimmeyerracing.com/pickup..._subframe.html http://www.jimmeyerracing.com/images...me_7463_sm.jpg http://www.jimmeyerracing.com/images...me_7475_sm.jpg "The Jim Meyer Racing Products adjustable low-roll-center Panhard bar, that mounts behind the rear axle housing, is also parallel with the centerline of the housing and uses the same multi-hole bracket at the housing that holds the shockwave air spring or coilover shocks. This allows you to tune the track bar, up-or-down at the housing, for the handling you like best. The front swivel, at the forward thru-frame crossmember, allows the entire housing, suspension and Panhard bar to stay level with the pavement while the body and chassis rolls around corners and during launching off the line. Handling and cornering will be vastly improved with our thru-frame antisway bar and Low Roll-Center Panhard bar and a set of ShockWave Air springs. " I can't comprehend how the bold part is physically possible. |
What about a satchell link? 4 bar system, straight uppers and triangulated lower links, no track bar to deal with. Gives you a really nice and low roll center and easy packaging seeing your predicament.
|
Quote:
I don't think that the satchell link has any packaging advantage over the traditional triangulated 4 link in my situation, but feel free to add ideas. So far there's a good amount of info here for applications that aren't restricted by stock sheet metal. |
Treat this design like the sun. If you must look at it, look very quickly and then turn away even quicker!
|
:rofl:
|
over the last couple of days I ordered the parts for the triangulated four link rear suspension.
I've got 4 of these coming for the axle end of the links: http://www.trail-gear.com/images/2008-1576-225.jpg There's a set of these on their way: http://www.swracecars.com/store/images/cart/40-223.JPG And also some DOM tube to make the bars and bushing sleeves for the frame end of the bars and an assortment of laser cut mounting tabs. |
Most of the parts I ordered for the rear suspension showed up (pics in the build thread) . I did some mock up and measuring and then messed with my CAD drawing. In the drawing the center of the rod ends are aligned with the centerline of the axle as viewed from the side. The center of the upper link is 8.25" above the CL of the axle and the center of the lower link is 4" below. With a lower link length of 30",the effective length of the upper links at 28". The lower link is drawn parallel to the ground. I ended up with an instant center of 99.5" in front of the axle centerline. The wheel base is 116".
good ? bad ? comments ? I'm all ears. |
You probably have a really low anitsquat percentage. So that might be something to consider.
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net