Great point Roger. Spacers will change your scrub radius. In my experience 5.5" backspace with a 9.5" wide wheel works very well. Although, if your not going to be competing with the car I dont think you will notice.

EDIT: Pad thickness of the wheel will also affect scrub radius.

You have to get the pivot center of the spindle to fall in the middle of the tire. The further off it is the more movement you will get out of the tire. Does the tire pivot around the axis or roll around it. It is rolls your going to need more room meaning a smaller tire.

If I understand this right the center pivot of the spindle would be the center of the ball joint. Is this correct?

So the heck with the spacer, go for a re-hoop?

Thanks to all those that replied. Here is picture from either side of the car without a alignment yet. Not sure if its helpful.

looks like you need some negative camber and all the weight on the front end.

Roger is right. I learned this lesson the hard way but there are other factors to consider when trying to achieve this. Not only is spindle location important but in order to complete this path to the tire you need to transfer this location through the center of the wheel and where it attaches to the hoop. Optimim location cant always be achieved. This is why.....When ordering wheels at a particular back space and trying to make room for bigger calipers sometimes optimum spindle location and where the center of the wheel meets the hoop is hard to achieve due to pad mounting thickness needed to clear calipers. Hope that made sense.
I'm not sure if this is something that just applies to first gen Camaro's as I am no expert but seems to have been my findings through past experience.

Cole, if you intend on being competitive in events rehooping is your best bet. Be sure to let the wheel manufacturer know what caliper you are using. Bringing the center of the wheel in will put you closer to your caliper. In addition if the pad mounting thickness of the wheel is not thick enough you may end up having a whole new center section made.

Picture a line center of upper ball joint center to lower ball joint center continuing to the ground. Also known as king pin inclination

http://www.mgf.ultimatemg.com/group2...ering_axis.gif

Excellent drawing!
There is LOTS of generic info on scrub radius issues around the forums and suspension type websites...and damn little consensus about what is "right".

My OPINION: I've built some cars with as small a scrub radius as possible...they seemed to be very light on the steering, some to the point they were twitchy. On my 33 Ford, the scrub as originally .568 negative...the centerline of the tire was about 9/16 inboard of the scrub line. Felt ok, but a little light and twitchy...but maybe I was just trying to get used to the car.
I changed to a 2" wider front wheel, with the extra width all to the outside, and from a 275 to a 315mm front tire. This moved the scrub radius to approx. 1.5" positive. Aside from the extra front traction, the car had a more stable and firm feel to it in a straight line, and has no "tramming" effects [following the grooves in the road].
Just my experience.

There are a group of circle track guys who recommend a zero scrub radius to make their cars easier to steer with no power steering. It probably works for them, but within their very narrow parameters.

Kind of reviving this. What was the consensus? I've been following Gaetano's build and like his set up but I too have considered running the 10's on my soon to be 69. I'm not worried about making mods to the inner fender, and/or limiting steering lock to lock. My concern is modifying the fender itself. I'd rather not lose the OEM fender.

Gaetano, you mention you modified the inner and outer fender. Are you talking about rolling the flange or actually pulling the fender out for more flare?

Bret, I am wanting to run the 18x10's 5.75 bs. On your system, are you restricting overall drop to 2"s? I know I can adjust for more drop with spring rates but don't want the same issues Cole is running into. I realize most of his trouble is his back space.

Cole, any new results?

David