Lateral-g Forums - 68 camaro proportioning valve (combination valve)HELP?

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)

- Brakes (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=91)

- - 68 camaro proportioning valve (combination valve)HELP? (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=49461)

Quote:

Originally Posted by 408sbfmustang (Post 597385)

Possible that the metering valve is stuck in it.

A good bleeding will center it. The first thing I looked for in his first picture was that black rubber nipple. It just sounds like he has a bunch of air in it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 597398)

You might have misunderstood why I posted what I did.... In a nutshell -- the stock type prop valves are designed to work with pretty much stock tire and brake sizes... I didn't say it wouldn't work with the master cylinder... I was giving you some information you could use so that you might question the use of a stock prop valve over a adjustable prop valve if you're NOT running stock or nearly stock tires etc. This is a safety issue.... you're brakes and understanding them should be your most important concern. Spinning at freeway speeds is nobodies idea of a good time. The brake bias of your system is critical to work properly when you'll need it the most... a panic stop.

You are absolutely right and I am not disagreeing with you Greg. As you said, the tires,wheels, and the brakes are all modified;therefore, the stock valve might not fit this application.

I started looking at the wilwood valve but the I have to order different size MC fittings to install the valve. Unfortunatelly the fittings are in back order and need to wait for two more weeks to get them.

As for the front to rear brake line, i am running stock 1/4 in brake line, which I installed recently but wilwood recommends 3/16 line instead. I am not sure if there is a prebent line in the market

Quote:

Originally Posted by 72Z/28 (Post 597418)

As for the front to rear brake line, i am running stock 1/4 in brake line, which I installed recently but wilwood recommends 3/16 line instead. I am not sure if there is a prebent line in the market

Most tube today is 3/16” or ¼”. 3/16” is stiffer, lighter, and easier to bend. It and its associated fittings are also the most common. ¼” has less internal friction (less resistant to fluid flow) and is easier to handle without damaging. Note that ¼” DOES NOT “provide more volume” to actuate the callipers more quickly as I have read more times than I care to remember. The MC piston’s bore and stroke determines the fluid volume displaced and therefore the pedal stroke required to apply the brakes. The tubing is sealed and full – its diameter has nothing to do with it (within reason) and you certainly won’t notice the difference between ¼” and 3/16” – except maybe the placebo effect cuz your buddy said so! I personally like to use 3/16”.

Chassis line from master to drop down is 1/4" and 3/16" line from the drop down to calipers is OEM spec?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sieg (Post 597436)

Chassis line from master to drop down is 1/4" and 3/16" line from the drop down to calipers is OEM spec?

Some OEM ABS systems combine the use of 1/4 and 3/16" in the same system. I researched this question for a couple hours and could find nothing definitive to explain the "recommendation" of 3/16" over 1/4" in this closed system. The volume difference - even if you calc'd all the line length and diameters is negligible and the PRESSURES would be the same in both line sizes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 597438)

3/16" tubing is lighter due to material and fluid capacity and easier to package and and form. lighter = faster