Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Shooting in Connecticut (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=39507)

Vince@Meanstreets 12-17-2012 03:08 PM

could not have said it better. The Pres has a big problem on his hands but where to start.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ravenworks (Post 452190)
As a former Marine NBC Warfare officer I appreciate the thoughts! :)

I responded to the other thread, "Suggestions for a home defense weapon" about the same time this event was hitting the news Friday. I will be quite candid and say that when I am out in public I scan everyone, I sit in restaurants so that I can see all those around me, and I feel I have become so used to it that it is affecting my quality of life.
I own a Sig P226, a Baretta FS92, a Colt AR15, and a few other weapons. These are the ones I mastered in the Marines, I am completely comfortable using them and pretty damn proficient with them.
That said I wish I never felt the need for them. I wish I never had to worry about being confronted by another with a gun. I wish I could feel the police would be there to protect my family. I hope I never witness carnage here like what is found on a battlefield, ever. The reality is, though, there is a chance that I will need to draw against someone as a civilian. A small chance, but a chance enough to make me carry (which I hate doing).
This country doesn't have a gun problem, we have a spiritual decay problem that has been going on for decades. The decimation of families, abortions (not starting a fight, just pointing out how cheap life has become), the dumbing-down of education, the hollowness that comes with celebrity worship, and the focus on exterior appearances have all contributed to the decay. Hollywood has a fixation on the young, the people with the least life experience and therefore the least wisdom. Even the music industry is affected, imagine the stars of the 60' & 70's being put through the "image-conscience, camera-friendly" world of todays music industry.
There is no depth in our society today, no wisdom espoused to a greater audience, no appreciation for (or knowledge of) our history and that of the world. I'm a 100% capitalist but our rampant consumerism has pushed artisans and craftsmen to the side, so little we make is of value anymore.
We have "9-11 truthers" and other people so gullible it's beyond my comprehension.
I look at my boys, 16 & 18, and I weep at the thought of the world they may end up living in. I've taught them what they need to be self-sufficient, to protect themselves, and taught them the lessons of history. I hope it serves them well when I'm not around any longer.
I also weep when I see this sort of event unfold. I avoid watching the news reporters and all their "experts" trying to "understand" what has happened, as if they could, while making the nutcase a celebrity in the process.
To be honest, I also feel an enormous amount of frustration when something like this happens and there is nobody like myself there to intervene. I have begun carrying in those "gun-free" zones as it seems this is where the shootings are most likely going to happen. Nothing is more tempting to a coward than not being a target himself.
Should I ever be present when one of these horror-events happen I will make certain that the tax-dollars spent to train me will not have been spent in vain. I'm not itching to start a fire-fight but have no problem finishing one. In the mean-time I will continue to train those in my life on how to protect themselves and others should they ever need too.
May God bless the vicitims of this, and other shootings, and may God have mercy on us all...


Sieg 12-17-2012 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab (Post 452244)
could not have said it better. The Pres has a big problem on his hands but where to start.

+1

Ravenworks - Thank you Sir. :hail:

intocarss 12-17-2012 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ravenworks (Post 452190)
As a former Marine NBC Warfare officer I appreciate the thoughts! :)

I responded to the other thread, "Suggestions for a home defense weapon" about the same time this event was hitting the news Friday. I will be quite candid and say that when I am out in public I scan everyone, I sit in restaurants so that I can see all those around me, and I feel I have become so used to it that it is affecting my quality of life.
I own a Sig P226, a Baretta FS92, a Colt AR15, and a few other weapons. These are the ones I mastered in the Marines, I am completely comfortable using them and pretty damn proficient with them.
That said I wish I never felt the need for them. I wish I never had to worry about being confronted by another with a gun. I wish I could feel the police would be there to protect my family. I hope I never witness carnage here like what is found on a battlefield, ever. The reality is, though, there is a chance that I will need to draw against someone as a civilian. A small chance, but a chance enough to make me carry (which I hate doing).
This country doesn't have a gun problem, we have a spiritual decay problem that has been going on for decades. The decimation of families, abortions (not starting a fight, just pointing out how cheap life has become), the dumbing-down of education, the hollowness that comes with celebrity worship, and the focus on exterior appearances have all contributed to the decay. Hollywood has a fixation on the young, the people with the least life experience and therefore the least wisdom. Even the music industry is affected, imagine the stars of the 60' & 70's being put through the "image-conscience, camera-friendly" world of todays music industry.
There is no depth in our society today, no wisdom espoused to a greater audience, no appreciation for (or knowledge of) our history and that of the world. I'm a 100% capitalist but our rampant consumerism has pushed artisans and craftsmen to the side, so little we make is of value anymore.
We have "9-11 truthers" and other people so gullible it's beyond my comprehension.
I look at my boys, 16 & 18, and I weep at the thought of the world they may end up living in. I've taught them what they need to be self-sufficient, to protect themselves, and taught them the lessons of history. I hope it serves them well when I'm not around any longer.
I also weep when I see this sort of event unfold. I avoid watching the news reporters and all their "experts" trying to "understand" what has happened, as if they could, while making the nutcase a celebrity in the process.
To be honest, I also feel an enormous amount of frustration when something like this happens and there is nobody like myself there to intervene. I have begun carrying in those "gun-free" zones as it seems this is where the shootings are most likely going to happen. Nothing is more tempting to a coward than not being a target himself.
Should I ever be present when one of these horror-events happen I will make certain that the tax-dollars spent to train me will not have been spent in vain. I'm not itching to start a fire-fight but have no problem finishing one. In the mean-time I will continue to train those in my life on how to protect themselves and others should they ever need too.
May God bless the vicitims of this, and other shootings, and may God have mercy on us all...

110% and Thank you

Bryan O 12-17-2012 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boss 5.0 (Post 452001)
I don't get it, and I never will.

If you don't get it and "never will" you don't want to get it. You can find "it" in the Federalist Papers.

btw, nothing mentioned therein about one's right to hunt.

cmraman 12-17-2012 06:42 PM

Shootings...
 
While the gun debate heats up. There is another debate that is closer to my heart. The shooter was recognized as having Aspergers, a form of Autism. He also had some mental illness. I'm a father of 2 Autistic boys and have a close friend with a Highschool son with Aspergers. She is dealing with hatred already. I'm afraid for my kids as well. Please don't judge these children on an isolated event. My boys are very innocent and loving. My friend's son is a very good kid as well. Here is a statement from the Autism Society of Wisconsin's Facebook page....

On Friday, 27 people in Connecticut lost their life through the acts of a single person. These people were children, teachers, husbands, wives, mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters. Today, their families are experiencing grief that cannot be described. Individuals impacted by Friday’s tragic shooting are in the hearts, thoughts and prayers throughout the Autism Society network.

Many national media outlets are reporting that the shooter was autistic. While as of yet, this has not been officially documented, many newspapers and television outlets are stating that the individual who shot the children and teachers was autistic. And, in such reports, there is an implication that autism might have had an impact on the person's mindset in leading to the shootings.

There is absolutely no evidence or any reliable research that suggests a linkage between autism and planned violence. To imply or suggest, as some are doing, that some linkage exists is wrong and harmful to the over 1.5 million law abiding, non-violent and wonderful individuals who live with autism each and every day. Stereotyping an entire group of individuals because of the actions of one is something is wrong and can't be accepted.

We ask that people not judge any autistic person based on what is being said about the killer of the innocent children and teachers. Rather, we ask that we continue to put our nation's attention on being there for the children and teachers who were killed on Friday.

Bryan O 12-17-2012 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 452024)
I see guns being valid for two reasons, hunting and self defense. I don't think you need an uzi or something for either, and I think you don't need 19+ round clips for either.

I disagree. Semi-auto "assault weapons" are highly effective self defense tools. Think riots.

glassman 12-17-2012 07:54 PM

Ravenworks, well said. Thank you for your service and I agree with everything u said.

I am a father of three, all great kids, 22, 20, 18. We have high standards and high morals but not hard with discipline (we were both "belted/whipped). But discipline is needed, just not abuse.

My oldest is a student in a doctorate program, wants to be an adolescent psychologist, there will be plenty of work for him as I see society "regressing forward"....

GregWeld 12-17-2012 08:22 PM

I don't want to turn this tragic thread into a gun discussion....


But my feeling is that our founding fathers wanted the citizenry to have guns for defense - defense against tyranny - defense against their own government gone wild (tyranny) - defense against a militia turned against it's citizenry.

The citizenry can't match muskets or Winchester 94's against todays high tech weaponry... Either from "friend" or foe... and while we can single out the "need" for these weapons as being the problem... I think the citizenry would have a far different thought -- if, or when, terrorists use a dirty bomb... or some other truly massive destructive device(s).

This is where people are torn -- because we understand that it's the weapons in the hands of ordinary citizens that keep the country "safe" -- yet at the same time it's also these weapons that are being used to create such devastating carnage and tragedy. I'm not sure how we balance these but that's where we probably need to get to.

Sieg 12-17-2012 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmraman (Post 452276)
While the gun debate heats up. There is another debate that is closer to my heart. The shooter was recognized as having Aspergers, a form of Autism. He also had some mental illness. I'm a father of 2 Autistic boys and have a close friend with a Highschool son with Aspergers. She is dealing with hatred already. I'm afraid for my kids as well. Please don't judge these children on an isolated event. My boys are very innocent and loving. My friend's son is a very good kid as well. Here is a statement from the Autism Society of Wisconsin's Facebook page....

On Friday, 27 people in Connecticut lost their life through the acts of a single person. These people were children, teachers, husbands, wives, mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters. Today, their families are experiencing grief that cannot be described. Individuals impacted by Friday’s tragic shooting are in the hearts, thoughts and prayers throughout the Autism Society network.

Many national media outlets are reporting that the shooter was autistic. While as of yet, this has not been officially documented, many newspapers and television outlets are stating that the individual who shot the children and teachers was autistic. And, in such reports, there is an implication that autism might have had an impact on the person's mindset in leading to the shootings.

There is absolutely no evidence or any reliable research that suggests a linkage between autism and planned violence. To imply or suggest, as some are doing, that some linkage exists is wrong and harmful to the over 1.5 million law abiding, non-violent and wonderful individuals who live with autism each and every day. Stereotyping an entire group of individuals because of the actions of one is something is wrong and can't be accepted.

We ask that people not judge any autistic person based on what is being said about the killer of the innocent children and teachers. Rather, we ask that we continue to put our nation's attention on being there for the children and teachers who were killed on Friday.

We have a 14 year old son that displays many traits common with Aspergers (soon to be officially referenced as ASD - Autism Spectrum Disorder), while he's not been officially diagnosed symptoms are there. I understand your concerns, due to the vast amount of unknown's this could easily get blown out of proportion. Not to downplay the public's or our own concerns of how it may relate to violence of this nature. The mind is a complex arena.

I did noticed at school today indifferent body language from a teacher that could have been a result of this news........can't blame them for being concerned.

Vince@Meanstreets 12-17-2012 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 452302)
I don't want to turn this tragic thread into a gun discussion....


But my feeling is that our founding fathers wanted the citizenry to have guns for defense - defense against tyranny - defense against their own government gone wild (tyranny) - defense against a militia turned against it's citizenry.

The citizenry can't match muskets or Winchester 94's against todays high tech weaponry... Either from "friend" or foe... and while we can single out the "need" for these weapons as being the problem... I think the citizenry would have a far different thought -- if, or when, terrorists use a dirty bomb... or some other truly massive destructive device(s).

This is where people are torn -- because we understand that it's the weapons in the hands of ordinary citizens that keep the country "safe" -- yet at the same time it's also these weapons that are being used to create such devastating carnage and tragedy. I'm not sure how we balance these but that's where we probably need to get to.

Great thoughts Greg and I think its too late,
Just a few of my thoughts.
Maybe in some states it is TOO easy to buy them. I will admit they probably should tighten the noose there.
Most guns are in hands that by law are not allowed to have them or people that do not respect them.
During the first Obama presidential run gun sales went through the roof. It will most likely be the same in the coming months.

My problem with the gun bans.

They send money, energy and effort in the wrong direction. Spending money towards a gun ban bill is big money. Put it towards the real problem.

Drunk driving we fix the sickness. We don't ban the vessel.

There is no way gun control advocates will win. They may make it inconvienient but never a true victiory. Try a search on how much the NRA spends in political contributions. Now look to see how much money is raised for the fight with the anti gun contributers.
The devotion for the sides are unbalance also. Gun control advocacy is strong during times where guns are used in a crime. Then slowly dies out a few weeks later. Pro gun people will fight till the bitter end.

Gun buy back is high all over the country, but look to what is being returned. Large amount of turn in guns are pre 55 and probably just purchased a few days earlier from the local Big 5 for under a hundred bucks. I like this cause the people turning in these guys probably do not respect them in the first place. Guns not in safes and stored under the living room coffee table might as well be sent to the FBI's Mexican relief program.

Vince@Meanstreets 12-17-2012 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Patch (Post 452287)
I disagree. Semi-auto "assault weapons" are highly effective self defense tools. Think riots.

and the zombie apocolyps

Shmoov69 12-17-2012 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ravenworks (Post 452190)
As a former Marine NBC Warfare officer I appreciate the thoughts! :)

This country doesn't have a gun problem, we have a spiritual decay problem that has been going on for decades. The decimation of families, abortions (not starting a fight, just pointing out how cheap life has become), the dumbing-down of education, the hollowness that comes with celebrity worship, and the focus on exterior appearances have all contributed to the decay. Hollywood has a fixation on the young, the people with the least life experience and therefore the least wisdom. Even the music industry is affected, imagine the stars of the 60' & 70's being put through the "image-conscience, camera-friendly" world of todays music industry.
There is no depth in our society today, no wisdom espoused to a greater audience, no appreciation for (or knowledge of) our history and that of the world. I'm a 100% capitalist but our rampant consumerism has pushed artisans and craftsmen to the side, so little we make is of value anymore.
We have "9-11 truthers" and other people so gullible it's beyond my comprehension.
I look at my boys, 16 & 18, and I weep at the thought of the world they may end up living in. I've taught them what they need to be self-sufficient, to protect themselves, and taught them the lessons of history. I hope it serves them well when I'm not around any longer.
I also weep when I see this sort of event unfold. I avoid watching the news reporters and all their "experts" trying to "understand" what has happened, as if they could, while making the nutcase a celebrity in the process.
To be honest, I also feel an enormous amount of frustration when something like this happens and there is nobody like myself there to intervene. I have begun carrying in those "gun-free" zones as it seems this is where the shootings are most likely going to happen. Nothing is more tempting to a coward than not being a target himself.
Should I ever be present when one of these horror-events happen I will make certain that the tax-dollars spent to train me will not have been spent in vain. I'm not itching to start a fire-fight but have no problem finishing one. In the mean-time I will continue to train those in my life on how to protect themselves and others should they ever need too.
May God bless the vicitims of this, and other shootings, and may God have mercy on us all...

First off, THANK YOU AND YOUR FAMILY FOR YOUR SERVICE!! :hail:

And secondly, you are absolutely correct on the "problem", it IS a spiritual problem.

GregWeld 12-17-2012 09:52 PM

Found this in an article today... about a kid that had "plans" to attack his school.



I thought it interesting that there was a quote from a legislator....


Some Oklahoma lawmakers, reacting to the Connecticut shooting, called Monday for allowing teachers and school administrators to carry firearms on school campuses.

Rep. Mark McCullough, R-Sapulpa, said he is working on a bill that would allow teachers and school administrators to receive firearms training through the Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training, which would authorize them to carry weapons at school and at school events.

"It scares me that a madman could come into my children's school and kill my children," said McCullough, who has two boys, ages 7 and 9. "We need to harden these targets, harden these facilities with simple, common-sense steps.

Vince@Meanstreets 12-17-2012 10:56 PM

Some states already have carry able teachers. I have mixed feelings about this. Like unarmed guards in a prison wing. You hate to see it but the chances for a bad guy to get his hands on it is high too.

I hope they get Magpul combat training and be able to hold a carry license.

GregWeld 12-18-2012 06:51 AM

An interesting bunch of statistics on guns in this country:




http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...n-america?lite

realcoray 12-18-2012 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shmoov69 (Post 452317)
First off, THANK YOU AND YOUR FAMILY FOR YOUR SERVICE!! :hail:

And secondly, you are absolutely correct on the "problem", it IS a spiritual problem.

This is so wrong that I don't even know where to begin.

What video game did Charles Whitman play in the 1960s before killing 16 people?

Google for a list of school shootings (or massacres, they are nearly one and the same). You'll find a list that extends hundreds of years, where people including kids killed someone at their school.

Have we been on a decline that long, since basically the country was created?

Or has it been the case that damaged people have existed and will continue to exist, and that their access to high powered guns has simply increased, meaning as a group it's a lot easier to kill whole groups of people very quickly?

I'm not saying that's the only issue in play here but it's certainly one of them.

Sieg 12-18-2012 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 452364)
An interesting bunch of statistics on guns in this country:




http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...n-america?lite

Quote:

the 1993 Brady Act prohibits the establishment of any electronic registry of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions.
.........maybe a little insight to the brilliance of the people establishing regulations to guide our society. :rolleyes:

Interesting data. If the US restricted only cheap Asian imports I imagine it would have a major impact on the total number of weapons. I see no need to sell junk weapons at Walmart pricing thus affordable to everyone. That alone would be one effective gun control measure.

Vegas69 12-18-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmraman (Post 452276)
While the gun debate heats up. There is another debate that is closer to my heart. The shooter was recognized as having Aspergers, a form of Autism. He also had some mental illness. I'm a father of 2 Autistic boys and have a close friend with a Highschool son with Aspergers. She is dealing with hatred already. I'm afraid for my kids as well. Please don't judge these children on an isolated event. My boys are very innocent and loving. My friend's son is a very good kid as well. Here is a statement from the Autism Society of Wisconsin's Facebook page....

On Friday, 27 people in Connecticut lost their life through the acts of a single person. These people were children, teachers, husbands, wives, mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters. Today, their families are experiencing grief that cannot be described. Individuals impacted by Friday’s tragic shooting are in the hearts, thoughts and prayers throughout the Autism Society network.

Many national media outlets are reporting that the shooter was autistic. While as of yet, this has not been officially documented, many newspapers and television outlets are stating that the individual who shot the children and teachers was autistic. And, in such reports, there is an implication that autism might have had an impact on the person's mindset in leading to the shootings.

There is absolutely no evidence or any reliable research that suggests a linkage between autism and planned violence. To imply or suggest, as some are doing, that some linkage exists is wrong and harmful to the over 1.5 million law abiding, non-violent and wonderful individuals who live with autism each and every day. Stereotyping an entire group of individuals because of the actions of one is something is wrong and can't be accepted.

We ask that people not judge any autistic person based on what is being said about the killer of the innocent children and teachers. Rather, we ask that we continue to put our nation's attention on being there for the children and teachers who were killed on Friday.

One of my best friends has a 17 year old son with Autism. He's very intelligent but doesn't speak. In the last year he has had episodes of violence hitting his mother to the point where his father must put his life on hold to be with him at most times. It worries me as my buddy has many guns but he has never operated guns around him. However, it would be pretty easy for him to go on youtube or other sources to figure it out.... This is a prime example of a situation where a gun safe is MANDATORY. It's clear that his son is very frustrated with his situation. He has communicated that he wants to move out and have his own life through an Ipad. Unfortunately, he'll likely never be able to do so. I can see how these type of situation could lead to great violence.

Please don't take this negatively against your boys. I just wanted to point out that some autistic kids are violent by nature depending on the degree.

GregWeld 12-18-2012 07:45 AM

I'd still argue that controlling "guns" isn't going to solve the problem... when we can't control the PEOPLE that wield them.

When you read the first couple of lines in that article --- there's more guns in the USA than there are people! So it seems to me to be an already impossible task to put controls on something where you really have no control.

I do agree that there's a reason we aren't all allowed to have machine guns... and that high powered semi-automatics with huge magazines are a "problem" - but given the millions of these things in circulation (I own 3 myself!) how do we go about keeping them out of the wrong hands? There's so many ways to get hold of these and no registration or laws etc are going to affect someone bent on killing innocent people.

I still think it's a knee jerk, reactionary, feel good, kind of thinking that doesn't solve anything.

One of my police buddies stopped last night - he'd been to Wades (a shooting range/gun store) and every semi-auto AR 15 style rifle they had was sold out as of Monday morning. Why? Because people fear they'll be banned.... OMG!! So because of this talk -- they'll sell millions more!! Now what good has that done and what has it solved?

You know -- the funny thing is -- I'm not even a gun fan! But I have CC permits in two states -- have a safe (burglary and fire safe!) where they are stored (and the ammo and the magazines!). Is that because I'm afraid for my life? No -- I'm afraid they'd get into the wrong hands! So I do everything I can to keep them safe.

I read a statistic this week that said 60% of Americans own guns... 60%! Holy cow. My guess is that about 10% are hunters.

cmraman 12-18-2012 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 452374)
One of my best friends has a 17 year old son with Autism. He's very intelligent but doesn't speak. In the last year he has had episodes of violence hitting his mother to the point where his father must put his life on hold to be with him at most times. It worries me as my buddy has many guns but he has never operated guns around him. However, it would be pretty easy for him to go on youtube or other sources to figure it out.... This is a prime example of a situation where a gun safe is MANDATORY. It's clear that his son is very frustrated with his situation. He has communicated that he wants to move out and have his own life through an Ipad. Unfortunately, he'll likely never be able to do so. I can see how these type of situation could lead to great violence.

Please don't take this negatively against your boys. I just wanted to point out that some autistic kids are violent by nature depending on the degree.

First of all educate yourself. First you said the child is non verbal. Mine are too. Have you ever thought that the reason for the outbursts is frustration?? Autistic children CAN'T express themselves. You need to think about the child's POV. First, how would you feel if you couldn't speak or express your wants or basic human needs at all, and would do anything out of frustration to try to communicate. My experience has told me that your friends' son is frustrated. Maybe it's provoked? I don't know the homelife. Do you? This is the narrow-mindedness that worries me. My oldest has at an early age, beat his head on the concrete driveway out of frustration for sure. THink about the parents as well. I'm sure there is a fair amount of frustration there too. Image for one minute, if you have kids, they cannot tell you when they are sick, hungry, upset, sad, happy, that they want to do certain things. Hell, they can't even say I love you. As a parent, when my child suddenly bursts out in tears and hits himself, I can see he's upset and frustrated about something, but he cant tell me why, I can't seem to figure out why. In the case of last Friday, there is much more to the story that what the media is saying. If your friend is concerned about the weapons, then he needs to take more precautions and keep them locked away. I'm not against the right to bear arms, but there is a certain responsibility that needs to take place. This also doesn't mean, any child with a disabiltiy is capable of hurting people either.

My friend who has a son with Aspergers found this. Here 18 year old son is already getting shunned at school. This sickens me. People need to educate themselves.

http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/why...164900109.html

Vegas69 12-18-2012 08:59 AM

Those are/ were EXACTLY my thoughts and I realize this is a very sensitive subject. Imagine being a 17 year old boy that can't go out with friends, go to college, have a girlfriend, on top of the communication... I've expressed that to his Dad. In fact, I talked to him about it 2 weeks ago. Kelli has autistic kids at school and they can be violent. It's like anything else in life, in the right circumstance, bad things can happen.

In the instance I'm talking about, I am genuinely worried about him getting his hands on a gun. He's a frustrated/violent kid and I'm not sure of his awareness of right and wrong. I've known him since he was 6 years old.

GregWeld 12-18-2012 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 452365)
access to high powered guns has simply increased, meaning as a group it's a lot easier to kill whole groups of people very quickly?



In ACTUAL FACT ---- if you read the article I posted --- there is FAR more access to guns in general and the murder rate has FALLEN at the same time.

I'm not saying I'm for more guns or anything of the kind -- I'm just saying that the FACTS don't hold water when relating homicides and the plentiful supply of weapons.


A quick copy and paste from the article....


The rate of firearms-related murders in 2011 was 3.2 per 100,000 people – a sharp decline from 1993 when the rate of firearms-related murders was 6.6 per 100,000 people.
The number of firearms-related murder victims dropped from more than 17,000 in 1993 to 9,903 in 2011.



The article points to two manufacturers whose sales have risen 200% or more --- so SALES of weapons have obviously risen at the same time as the murder rate has dropped in half. If they were directly related - we'd see both numbers rising or falling. But here, clearly - one has doubled - and one was cut in half.

hifi875 12-18-2012 10:15 AM

There are just bad poeple in this world also. Unfortunately there is no real way to stop these things from happening. i'm not saying do nothing, but poeple will find a way to kill poeple, be it with a gun or a knife or fertilizer.
There are no simple answers.

Ketzer 12-18-2012 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 452391)
In ACTUAL FACT

Some folks do not like the facts getting in the way of their feelings or opinions.
(this is NOT directed to anyone here!, just my opinion of a nation influenced so strongly by media)


Jeff-

Sieg 12-18-2012 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ketzer (Post 452405)
Some folks do not like the facts getting in the way of their feelings or opinions.
(this is NOT directed to anyone here!, just my opinion of a nation influenced so strongly by media)


Jeff-

Glad other's pay attention to that fact. In this day and age the media is much more opinion based than fact based. Facts don't surface until the feeding frenzy calms.

realcoray 12-18-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hifi875 (Post 452401)
There are just bad poeple in this world also. Unfortunately there is no real way to stop these things from happening. i'm not saying do nothing, but poeple will find a way to kill poeple, be it with a gun or a knife or fertilizer.
There are no simple answers.

This is true but such a flimsy position. How many massacres with knives are we seeing? How many teenagers are going to put together a bomb that does anything like this?

As far as the number of guns going up and crime going down, I didn't even mention that because I don't see how it's relevant. Your belief Greg is apparently that because the number of guns has risen, the volume of gun crime has dropped.

I doubt anyone could prove that, and I can offer quite a few other possible reasons. Let's see, longer minimum sentences mean that repeat offenders are in jail and thus not on the street to shoot people. More law enforcement means less crime, or at least people are caught earlier and therefore go to jail on those minimum sentences and so forth.

I agree 100% with the title of the article. Gun control offers no cure-all. You can't ban assault rifles and high capacity clips and think it will go away, but as part of a comprehensive approach to combating violence like the shooting.

hifi875 12-18-2012 12:34 PM

lets see there was one in china last friday(knife i believe). the columbine idiots had made home made bombs. WTH is flimsy.

nicks67ca 12-18-2012 12:37 PM

The checks and balances in CT on firearms is among the best in the US. With that said it wasn't good enough. I think there is more on the ammunition and accessories side that should be done.

Why not the same background check on any ammunition purchases over 50 rounds?

Why not limit the high capacity mags and or have the same waiting period and background check?

The ammunition and accessories are far to easy to get a hold of. Everyone who purchases firearms legally now use either a Drivers, hunting, or conceal carry licenses. I for one won't mind waiting an extra couple minutes when i purchase my rounds or next magazine.

I'll again add an additional perspective, I just saw half my graduating class at services today. Just an terrible way to catch up friends.

I also encountered the media when I was walking to my car. I was trying not to make eye contact with him but he approached my none the less. He asked if he could ask me a question and I just looked at him with utter disgust. Showing pictures of kids lined up at a funeral home is just wrong.

Nick

nicks67ca 12-18-2012 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hifi875 (Post 452417)
lets see there was one in china last friday(knife i believe).

Don't forget that the difference is all 22 of those children are going home.

GregWeld 12-18-2012 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 452414)
I agree 100% with the title of the article. Gun control offers no cure-all. You can't ban assault rifles and high capacity clips and think it will go away, but as part of a comprehensive approach to combating violence like the shooting.


When someone can show me that banning something ends the problem -- I'll totally agree with you. 'Til then - it's nothing but a feel good move that solves nothing.

We banned booze for awhile

We banned drugs

We don't allow teenage sex

We pledge to stay married for ever and ever

We swear to God "we'll never do "it" again".... and that lasts maybe 15 minutes.

We're humans. Humans just don't mind very well. Most of us do... but those few pesky ones -- well -- they just ruin it for all of us.

:cheers:

realcoray 12-18-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hifi875 (Post 452417)
lets see there was one in china last friday(knife i believe). the columbine idiots had made home made bombs. WTH is flimsy.

And how many people died because of those two things?

Oh that's right, zero!

Someone could make a bomb that could kill way more people than a gun. The worst school massacre was done with a bomb, but that's the thing, since then over the last 100 years it's a lot more difficult to get your hands on explosives, and it's just generally a lot more work to do similar damage.

The colorado guy had a bomb or something akin to it, if it was so efficient why did he leave it where he lived, instead of just driving a car bomb to the theatre?

I'm not saying ban guns, I'm saying that people generally accept that the second amendment doesn't say you can bear any arms in particular, like oh an automatic weapon, a RPG, or a nuclear bomb. I think it's reasonable as one facet of an overall approach to say maybe we shouldn't sell armor piercing bullets to just whomever, or high capacity clips, or high powered assault rifles.

It will NOT fix the problem tomorrow, I mean the gun used in this shooting was banned, but grandfathered in, but nothing will fix it immediately.

GregWeld 12-18-2012 12:55 PM

You remember when we had a drag strip in almost every community in America back in the 50's and 60's? Why? To get kids to stop street racing....

Then we banned the drag strips 'cause they draw crowds and cause traffic problems and make too much noise...

Now we're back to street racing and kids getting killed.....

Don't those stupid kids know that's been banned!!!

hifi875 12-18-2012 12:57 PM

i didnt mean to sound insensitive. Its just a subject with no definitive answers. The media is just going on and on about it, sensationalizing the whole story and thinking they can find the answer to how and why. Then the politicians use it as a platform and say something must be done. But they don't know what to do either.

hifi875 12-18-2012 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 452422)
And how many people died because of those two things?

Oh that's right, zero!

Someone could make a bomb that could kill way more people than a gun. The worst school massacre was done with a bomb, but that's the thing, since then over the last 100 years it's a lot more difficult to get your hands on explosives, and it's just generally a lot more work to do similar damage.

The colorado guy had a bomb or something akin to it, if it was so efficient why did he leave it where he lived, instead of just driving a car bomb to the theatre?

I'm not saying ban guns, I'm saying that people generally accept that the second amendment doesn't say you can bear any arms in particular, like oh an automatic weapon, a RPG, or a nuclear bomb. I think it's reasonable as one facet of an overall approach to say maybe we shouldn't sell armor piercing bullets to just whomever, or high capacity clips, or high powered assault rifles.

It will NOT fix the problem tomorrow, I mean the gun used in this shooting was banned, but grandfathered in, but nothing will fix it immediately.

He wasn't a teenager, but timothy mcveigh, lets see, he killed 168 poeple including alot of children 19 to be exact.

Shmoov69 12-18-2012 01:02 PM

It was a broad brushstroke about society in general, not just this particular instance. There is no denying that things that were once socially unacceptable are now quite acceptable and sometimes even praised. (I'm talking about the US BTW) The only thing it takes for evil to prevail is for good to do nothing. I am aware that Evil will ALWAYS exist and that bad people do bad things, but it is only getting worse by (either) the good being silent, or the good being silenced.
My .02
Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 452365)
This is so wrong that I don't even know where to begin.

What video game did Charles Whitman play in the 1960s before killing 16 people?

Google for a list of school shootings (or massacres, they are nearly one and the same). You'll find a list that extends hundreds of years, where people including kids killed someone at their school.

Have we been on a decline that long, since basically the country was created?

Or has it been the case that damaged people have existed and will continue to exist, and that their access to high powered guns has simply increased, meaning as a group it's a lot easier to kill whole groups of people very quickly?

I'm not saying that's the only issue in play here but it's certainly one of them.


intocarss 12-18-2012 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 452421)
When someone can show me that banning something ends the problem -- I'll totally agree with you. 'Til then - it's nothing but a feel good move that solves nothing.

We banned booze for awhile

We banned drugs

We don't allow teenage sex

We pledge to stay married for ever and ever

We swear to God "we'll never do "it" again".... and that lasts maybe 15 minutes.

We're humans. Humans just don't mind very well. Most of us do... but those few pesky ones -- well -- they just ruin it for all of us.

:cheers:

:cheers:

Bryan O 12-18-2012 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 452422)
Oh that's right, zero!

Wrong! 60 million.

Are you saying we should emulate China?

Quote:

I think it's reasonable as one facet of an overall approach to say maybe we shouldn't sell armor piercing bullets to just whomever, or high capacity clips, or high powered assault rifles.

It will NOT fix the problem tomorrow, I mean the gun used in this shooting was banned, but grandfathered in, but nothing will fix it immediately.
Correct! It WILL make things far worse. It WILL set the stage for an American Mao.

The things you want to ban ensure we will not have an American Mao.

rugbyguy 12-18-2012 01:31 PM

Gentleman,
I was going to go into to a ten minute tirad about how american's don't need tactical weapon, but probably not gonna change anyone's mind. So here is a little info I picked up. Gun Deaths 2011 Japan 48, Great Britan 8, Canada 52, Israel 58, Sweden 21, Germany 42, United States 10,782.

I live in Canada where we have laws that regulate restricted and prohibited firearms. I don't walk around in fear and feel the need to arm myself. If someone takes my stuff I have insurance. If some comes into my house I have a sherwood 5050 hockey stick( no pun intended), and 911.

Just my $0.02

Cheers
Mack

P.S. I'll be sure to see some of you profiled on a upcoming episode of Doomsday Preppers.:cheers: :

Shmoov69 12-18-2012 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rugbyguy (Post 452439)

P.S. I'll be sure to see some of you profiled on a upcoming episode of Doomsday Preppers.:cheers: :

LOL!! Never seen it, but a lot of us wear tinfoil hats down to the south of you! We must find them quite comforting or something!! LOL!:willy:

Really tho, for some reason or another (or many), a lot of us just don't trust our government. I think that is a big reason for our "fear".

Bryan O 12-18-2012 01:46 PM

Governments can definitely be trusted. Trusted to produce Hitlers.

Since Mack threw up Germany as an example let's do the math:

6,000,000 ÷ 10,782 = 556.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net