Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Open Discussion (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Baffled (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=46745)

Vince@Meanstreets 07-13-2014 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560211)
The last 5 gallons I put in the car prior to this last fill was from a local station in Placerville. He was down to the bottom of the barrel with 110 and had to tilt the barrel to get me 5 gallons.

f-you, I just woke up. LOL

GregWeld 07-13-2014 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560222)
I repeat......my motor is 14:1



Well no wonder it won't run worth a sh!t.....



How much timing are you running total?? That motor might need some more -- 114* octane can take more timing...

Have you tried 38* total?

GregWeld 07-13-2014 06:11 PM

14:1 compression ratio -- big ass cam -- 114 octane race gas... MORE TIMING needed! Holy smokes dude -- who built you a 14:1 motor!??!


I'm being serious here -- that motor can take 36 or 38* of total.

Pump gas - great heads - might make best power on 32 to 34* but pump premium with oxygenated etc - is going to take less (retarded) timing

Track Junky 07-13-2014 06:30 PM

That's some interesting info Greg. I didn't know higher compression likes more timing. When I originally dynode this motor in Muncie, Indiana at the builder shop we went with 38* total timing.

When I dyno tuned down here after the timing chain incident Joe thought it ran best at 32.5*.

Track Junky 07-13-2014 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab (Post 560224)
f-you, I just woke up. LOL

Now your making sense LOL

Flash68 07-13-2014 06:36 PM

I disagree with Greg to a point on timing needed. Compression is part of it but the efficiency of the heads/combustion chamber has a big part to do with it.

Based on your theory Greg, tell me why my motor likes 30* timing (13:1 compression) and Rob's FE likes near 40* (less than mine, around 12:1 give or take).

It's mostly due to the difference in combustion chamber, valve angle, etc.

Typical 23* headed engines do not run low timing (relatively) like 32* so that is very surprising. 36-38* sounds more like it. I am thinking Joe built in a lot of safety for you? I dunno else why. That doesn't make much sense to me based on what you've shared.

Flash68 07-13-2014 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 560216)

I think Dave's engine builder is the one that talked him into blending race gas with his pump gas.... that was good for about a day's worth. LOL

Wrong. The motor blew because I DID NOT add some 100 octane in that weekend like previously. Constant beating with shaky unpredictable 91 octane on a high revving 11:1 motor was not the best thing to do, but it is what it is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560222)
I repeat......my motor is 14:1

Weren't you 12.5 to 1 before?

Track Junky 07-13-2014 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 560235)
Wrong. The motor blew because I DID NOT add some 100 octane in that weekend like previously. Constant beating with shaky unpredictable 91 octane on a high revving 11:1 motor was not the best thing to do, but it is what it is.



Weren't you 12.5 to 1 before?

Nope. Build sheet shows 14:1. Piston part number shows 15:1

Flash68 07-13-2014 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560237)
Nope. Build sheet shows 14:1. Piston part number shows 15:1

:eek:

You should be running $3 race gas IMO......



E85

:D

Track Junky 07-13-2014 06:53 PM

My car is going to use gas like a Prius compared to yours. I filled my tank at Sonoma and then ran a full session. Went back to the pumps and refilled just to get an idea of how much fuel I used........only 4.3 gallons

Flash68 07-13-2014 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560242)
My car is going to use gas like a Prius compared to yours. I filled my tank at Sonoma and then ran a full session. Went back to the pumps and refilled just to get an idea of how much fuel I used........only 4.3 gallons

Sounds like a part throttle session to me. Step on it would ya? :lol:

Track Junky 07-13-2014 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 560243)
Sounds like a part throttle session to me. Step on it would ya? :lol:

That's fricken funny......and you could be right :headscratch: :lol:

Shmoov69 07-13-2014 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 560243)
Sounds like a part throttle session to me. Step on it would ya? :lol:

Sheesh! That's what I was thinking!! 4.3 gallons on a track day?!? The only time didn't use more (like 2-3 times that!) was wen it was broke on the trailer after a few runs! LoL!

intocarss 07-13-2014 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 560234)
I disagree with Greg to a point on timing needed. Compression is part of it but the efficiency of the heads/combustion chamber has a big part to do with it.

Based on your theory Greg, tell me why my motor likes 30* timing (13:1 compression) and Rob's FE likes near 40* (less than mine, around 12:1 give or take).

It's mostly due to the difference in combustion chamber, valve angle, etc.

Typical 23* headed engines do not run low timing (relatively) like 32* so that is very surprising. 36-38* sounds more like it. I am thinking Joe built in a lot of safety for you? I dunno else why. That doesn't make much sense to me based on what you've shared.

;) :hello:

Track Junky 07-13-2014 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shmoov69 (Post 560252)
Sheesh! That's what I was thinking!! 4.3 gallons on a track day?!? The only time didn't use more (like 2-3 times that!) was wen it was broke on the trailer after a few runs! LoL!

You do realize I'm just talking about one session out of the 4 total for the day right Jimmy :headscratch:

GregWeld 07-13-2014 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560231)
That's some interesting info Greg. I didn't know higher compression likes more timing. When I originally dynode this motor in Muncie, Indiana at the builder shop we went with 38* total timing.

When I dyno tuned down here after the timing chain incident Joe thought it ran best at 32.5*.



Well a dyno is the PROPER way to build a real tune on any motor....

I'd be running 36* in that motor to start with and see if it likes it.





Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 560234)
I disagree with Greg to a point on timing needed. Compression is part of it but the efficiency of the heads/combustion chamber has a big part to do with it.

Based on your theory Greg, tell me why my motor likes 30* timing (13:1 compression) and Rob's FE likes near 40* (less than mine, around 12:1 give or take).

It's mostly due to the difference in combustion chamber, valve angle, etc.

Typical 23* headed engines do not run low timing (relatively) like 32* so that is very surprising. 36-38* sounds more like it. I am thinking Joe built in a lot of safety for you? I dunno else why. That doesn't make much sense to me based on what you've shared.



It has EVERYTHING to do with combustion efficiency.... and heads and the propagation of the flame travel etc. However..... High compression only tells you what gas you're going to have to run -- it doesn't tell you what timing a motor is going to need / want.

The fuel - in this case - is what leads me to the timing in question. So assuming he has good heads - aluminum - we know he has high compression -- and the numbers he's tossing out is the STATIC compression number of the piston --- because what really counts is the CYLINDER PRESSURE -- and that depends on his cam numbers. But 114 octane gas is going to want more timing than pump fuel.







Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560237)
Nope. Build sheet shows 14:1. Piston part number shows 15:1




Really doesn't matter except the high compression is going to want high octane fuel in order to stave off detonation. Thus the only real reason to understand that part of the motor.




Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560254)
You do realize I'm just talking about one session out of the 4 total for the day right Jimmy :headscratch:




I burn about 9 gallons per session.... might have something to do with how often a guy is WOT..... LOL

GregWeld 07-13-2014 08:05 PM

BTW -- For the record --- WE ARE ALL JUST GUESSING....


Mines just a more educated guess.

Track Junky 07-13-2014 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 560261)
I burn about 9 gallons per session.... might have something to do with how often a guy is WOT..... LOL

We've chatted about this before. That is weird. Not sure why your using so much fuel.........Same deal at T-Hill. I use about 5 gallons a session there and our lap times as of late have been pretty close.

Shmoov69 07-13-2014 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560254)
You do realize I'm just talking about one session out of the 4 total for the day right Jimmy :headscratch:

No, actually I didn't realize that. Not sure how big the track is there and how many laps, so I can't comment on what mine "would be" there. All I know is that I had to fill like 3 times at Putnam park when I ran there a couple different times. And that was going in with a full tank.

But glad that you may be figuring it out that it could be the gas. It sounded to me like an ignition issue, but if for some reason fuel isn't burning, then it would seem like ignition. I'm anxious to see what you find to be the real issue. Lots of discussion and learning going on here

GregWeld 07-13-2014 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 560234)
I disagree with Greg to a point on timing needed. Compression is part of it but the efficiency of the heads/combustion chamber has a big part to do with it.

Based on your theory Greg, tell me why my motor likes 30* timing (13:1 compression) and Rob's FE likes near 40* (less than mine, around 12:1 give or take).It's mostly due to the difference in combustion chamber, valve angle, etc.



Totally agree with you --- until we toss in the 114 octane.
You can not compare two completely different motors -- all that will tell you is that they are completely different. For many obvious reasons.


A good running MOPAR 440 --- wants 40* total on PUMP gas with good heads. That's NOT a SBC.... or a FORD for that matter. Different motors want different timing.








Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 560234)
23* headed engines do not run low timing (relatively) like 32* so that is very surprising. 36-38* sounds more like it. I am thinking Joe built in a lot of safety for you? I dunno else why. That doesn't make much sense to me based on what you've shared.



Good heads -- tight quench -- etc -- my 408 motor ran 34* and made best power. A dyno is going to tell you -- you don't tell it. You find it. The numbers don't lie. It was also running PUMP GAS not 114.

GregWeld 07-13-2014 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560265)
We've chatted about this before. That is weird. Not sure why your using so much fuel.........Same deal at T-Hill. I use about 5 gallons a session there and our lap times as of late have been pretty close.



Oh I don't really use 9 gallons per session buddy - just pulling your leg.... But it is 9 gallons per fill up ---- and that's about 2 sessions... so 4.5 to 5 gallons per is similar to what you're seeing.

GregWeld 07-13-2014 08:58 PM

Gaetano ---- Regardless of all the gas and timing discussion ---- you need to FIND the right timing for YOUR motor. That could be 32* or it could be 36* and anywhere in-between.


I don't think you can find that with just seat of the pants driving. And damage can occur if you get it wrong - so it's more than just a little important.

Vince@Meanstreets 07-13-2014 09:01 PM

dyno time is the only imho. Your engine numbers and AFR's will tell you what it wants.

Track Junky 07-13-2014 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 560272)
Gaetano ---- Regardless of all the gas and timing discussion ---- you need to FIND the right timing for YOUR motor. That could be 32* or it could be 36* and anywhere in-between.


I don't think you can find that with just seat of the pants driving. And damage can occur if you get it wrong - so it's more than just a little important.

Yeah I get it. Joe said the same thing when he was dyno tuning my motor. 32.5* total is what he came up with. Don't know or remember exactly how he came to that conclusion but we made over 20 pulls and a few changes and he would pull spark plugs and inspect them with some sort of spark plug magnifying scope gismo.
I'm trying to schedule Joe for a chassis dyno tune at Sonoma the Friday before the event since I put another distributor in and the springs on the original distributor don't look the same as the ones I'm using now.

Vince@Meanstreets 07-13-2014 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560277)
Yeah I get it. Joe said the same thing when he was dyno tuning my motor. 32.5* total is what he came up with. Don't know or remember exactly how he came to that conclusion but we made over 20 pulls and a few changes and he would pull spark plugs and inspect them with some sort of spark plug magnifying scope gismo.
I'm trying to schedule Joe for a chassis dyno tune at Sonoma the Friday before the event since I put another distributor in and the springs on the original distributor don't look the same as the ones I'm using now.

Don't forget we can schedule a chassis dyno session with Joe over at Borelli's. They can set up fo AFR's and it may save down time. Aaron say saturdays would be good.

GregWeld 07-13-2014 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560277)
Yeah I get it. Joe said the same thing when he was dyno tuning my motor. 32.5* total is what he came up with. Don't know or remember exactly how he came to that conclusion but we made over 20 pulls and a few changes and he would pull spark plugs and inspect them with some sort of spark plug magnifying scope gismo.
I'm trying to schedule Joe for a chassis dyno tune at Sonoma the Friday before the event since I put another distributor in and the springs on the original distributor don't look the same as the ones I'm using now.




GOOD 'cause it's way cheaper than new motors.

Track Junky 07-13-2014 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab (Post 560278)
Don't forget we can schedule a chassis dyno session with Joe over at Borelli's. They can set up fo AFR's and it may save down time. Aaron say saturdays would be good.


That sounds good Vince as long as its convenient for Joe. Joe lives over by Sonoma. Where is Borelli's located?

Vince@Meanstreets 07-13-2014 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Track Junky (Post 560280)
That sounds good Vince as long as its convenient for Joe. Joe lives over by Sonoma. Where is Borelli's located?

http://borellimotorsports.com/newsit...s/dyno-tuning/

He would be down for a dyno day. Especially if he can schedule a few cars and rent the dyno for a full day and give him time to prep.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net