![]() |
Quote:
The car looks fantastic. Years ago I wanted to protour one, but after learning what protouring really means to most people, nope. I'd bag it and run astro supremes and skinny whites with lakepipes traditional 60s style. But thats just my opinion. Love this one minus the striping: http://www.rodandcustommagazine.com/.../photo_03.html http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ZqXXq3ROw4...d_riviera5.jpg Wheels and tires is all a riv need, the bags are neat because rivieras look MEAN low That said I may buy one after selling the mini. I need to own one before I expire. |
|
|
|
Rouge:
The car looks fantastic. Thanks. "Years ago I wanted to protour one, but after learning what protouring really means to most people, nope. I'd bag it and run astro supremes and skinny whites with lakepipes traditional 60s style. But thats just my opinion." And I appreciate your input. I now understand where you were/are coming from. You enjoy a combination of the 50's Lead Sled Styling, mixed with some Low Rider attitude. Right? Is this pretty close? I love the 49-51 Merc's. Were my pockets a lot deeper, that would be one car I would have in my garage. I hope someday you can get a riv. I think you would really enjoy it. I hope your get to feeling better, for longer segments of time. I've mentioned you to my wife, and showed her your Camaro along with the Videos you've made. You have a fan believe me, she likes the cars I'm working on, but she can't wait for me to get the 69 Camaro on the road so we can enjoy that car the way you have yours. The old Camaro I had was the car she and I started dating in, and like me we share many memories about that car. ;) I look in the rear and I must of been a really skinny Sh*t back then, or very motivated. Probably both. :unibrow: Please stay safe, and if you feel like it, shoot me an email with an update. Also, any tips or suggestions ALWAYS pass those along. Take care and hang in there, Sincerely, Ty |
Quote:
|
Ty,
The car looks fantastic! And, for whatever its worth I think you did a great job of hitting the mark dead on! Great blend of updated performance, but without taking anything away from the original "feel" of the car. Nice job! |
Quote:
Neil: Thanks for the email and input. Did you keep all the parts so it could always be put back if you or some else decided to and some future date? If so, I could be wrong, but I'm not sure why the purest would even be upset. Most of the cars the purest want to do a "frame Off", rotisserie Restoration to, almost always need to be taken complete apart, cleaned/fixed/replaced, then reassembled. Doing a build like this one I think isn't much different. You are just waiting to reassemble back to stock at a later time instead of immediately. One thing for sure though, at least on cars that are not well supported, you better keep ALL the nuts and bolts and pieces in a safe place, as they they would be almost impossible to acquire at a date sometime in the future. Were you able to keep your parts organized and packaged in a easy to find way? Thanks, Ty |
Quote:
Eric: Thanks for the input, I appreciate it. The next thing I would like to do is get some good performance numbers on the Car now as it is vs. what Road and Track wrote about the car when they were new. I would hope there would be some improvement, however I'm not sure how diligent the Magazines were back then in doing the testing in such a way that it was reliably repeatable, and that the Testing Parameters haven't changed in the last 45+ years. I guess I'll see what the car can do. 0-60 mph 0-100 mph 60-0 Lateral acceleration 40-70 mph Passing time etc., etc. Then if the result don't pass the sniff test, I'll repeat them and see if at least my numbers are constant with themselves. While I am waiting, I'll research to see if there was a standardized methodology for a particular test. I know in material science they use Test according to ASTM Standards. (American Society for Testing and Materials) This reminds me of an article I read recently regarding the accuracy of engine Dyno's with the same car moving though a series of different testing machines. The results were interesting, and as a rule were all within a certain percentage of each other, but I think the consensus was that there were NOT going to agree with each other no matter what. Some additional measurements could have been taken, but maybe what they had already used up all the space they had for the article, or they didn't want to boar the readers? I wish they had run the standard deviation with all the data, and using statistics, determine if the differences were significant, or basically "Noise". I know, "Geek Alert", but it is a useful exercise, and occasionally turns out some very interesting information. Anyway, thanks a again for writing, and the nice comments of my Riv. I appreciate it. Take care, Ty |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net