Trailers?

yup...trailers. I dont know why they are worried about it fitting on a car trailer but they were. I guess they are not confident of its reliablility. :rofl: Chevy guys..go figure. :lol:

2006 Dodge Charger R/T HEMI
Base price: V-6 $22,295; price as tested with HEMI V-8 and Road & Track package, $31,495
Engine: 5.7-liter V-8, 340 hp/390 lb-ft; 3.5-liter V-6, 250 hp/250 lb-ft
Transmission: Five-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Length x width x height: 200.1 x 74.5 x 58.2 in
Wheelbase: 120.0 in
Curb weight: 3727 lb
Fuel economy (EPA city/hwy): 17/25 mpg
Safety equipment: Multi-stage front airbags and side-curtain airbags; anti-lock brakes; traction control; electronic stability control with tire-pressure monitors
Major standard features: Air conditioning; power windows/locks/mirrors; electric rear defroster; 18-inch wheels; cruise control; tilt/telescoping steering wheel; AM/FM/CD player
Warranty: Three years/36,000 miles; seven years/70,000 powertrain

Ok to set the record straight the new CHALLENGER will not weigh 4000#. The 4 door CHARGER only weighs 3700. If you look at all the safety gizmos and and luxury doodads. Its a wonder it isnt 2.5 tons.

I Feel they have missed the mark on the new CAMARO. Its styling is just odd to me. The whole car reminds me of a 72 grand prix too long in front and the stumpy rear is just not sexy.

I agree with some posters retro would look better. Good looks are timeless thats my point and I am sticking to it.

Okay maybe a production version won't weigh over 4000 lbs, but the concept car did weigh over 4000 lbs. Atleast thats what the tag says.

http://www.supercars.net/gallery/119513/330/11547.jpg