Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Chassis and Suspension (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   Art Morrison Max G sub (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3398)

Sinco 02-12-2006 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by novanutcase
John Parsons has said that to just narrow the C-5 will throw the geometry off. Did Wayne reconfigure it with different attach points? Did this also change the mount points for the motor in terms of height?

I don't know all the details that Wayne did. I'm sure he just did'nt pull the hubs in and call it a day. That's why I had him do the job because he knew where to put things so everything would work correctly. Trust me after studying JPs pics he definately knows a thing or two about suspension geometry. I know we did have to raise the rack. We are going to set the engine back anyways so that shouldn't be a problem. I haven't mocked up the engine yet, when I do I'll post some pics.

novanutcase 02-14-2006 01:12 AM

Rack raising
 
sin, in raising the rack did this influence your moving the motor back to clear the rack or was it purely for better balance throughout? Since I am thinking seriously of having Wayne do a similar frame for me I need to know since this is probably not an option I want to do.

TravisB 02-14-2006 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by novanutcase
sin, in raising the rack did this influence your moving the motor back to clear the rack or was it purely for better balance throughout? Since I am thinking seriously of having Wayne do a similar frame for me I need to know since this is probably not an option I want to do.


he probably had to raise the rack...sinco(doug)is moving the engine back to get wieght off the front end...in fact I think he has a couple more ideas for getting weight off the front end :_paranoid

wiedemab 12-08-2006 07:02 AM

Thinking Out Loud
 
Just revisiting an old thread.

I wasn't implying that WD was just pulling the hubs in and calling it a day. I was just stating that relative to each side of the front suspension, if the inner and outer pickup points for the control arms and inner and outer tie rod positions do not change relative to one another (in 3D space), characteristics like bumpsteer, camber gain, caster gain etc. would not change.

Looking at the whole front suspension - Ackerman would change because the radius by which the inner and outer wheel follow in a turn would change due to the distance between the wheels changing.

Narrowing the Vette suspension would require that the Corvette rack be modified or a different rack be used. I thought I read somewhere that WD was incorporating a Mustang R&P into his design.

Anyway, I'm far from a suspension expert. Both Wayne Due and John Parsons (as well as many other people) know more about suspension geometry than I ever will, so if I'm wrong, please correct me, but I think my statements are accurate.

Later,

Brandon


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net