Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Shooting in Connecticut (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=39507)

Sieg 01-21-2013 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab (Post 459672)
"what else do you have in the warehouse?"

I don't have a warehouse but there's a couple sources I could ask......just want to have the right part number! :D All my stuff is 52-55 grn V-Max.

Vince@Meanstreets 01-21-2013 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sieg (Post 459677)
I don't have a warehouse but there's a couple sources I could ask......just want to have the right part number! :D All my stuff is 52-55 grn V-Max.

Fiotcchi Hornady 55
haaaa, thats the good stuff that I hoard everytime I go to Cabelas. Last time I bought it was $33 box of 50. Now its $39 for 20.

.

BTW that was a quote from gone in 60.

Tony_SS 01-22-2013 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 459565)
33 states have no requirement, and the other 17 have varying degrees of checks that fall into 3 buckets, background check, background check for handgun only and background check for a permit that allows you then to purchase guns, which is what MO has and what to me makes the most logical sense to me as not only could it close the loophole, it could actually provide some benefit for responsible gun owners, for example you could lower the waiting period, or really just not ban any guns or clips or anything.

CT had some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, and yet, see what still happened? More laws do not stop crazy, and that proves my point.

Do you have an actual source where I can see for myself? Because no matter what state you buy in, if you buy from an FFL, that is a Federal license and they are required to run a background check.

Tell me about this 'no requirement' you're talking about.

realcoray 01-22-2013 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony_SS (Post 459697)
CT had some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, and yet, see what still happened? More laws do not stop crazy, and that proves my point.

Do you have an actual source where I can see for myself? Because no matter what state you buy in, if you buy from an FFL, that is a Federal license and they are required to run a background check.

Tell me about this 'no requirement' you're talking about.

I was talking about gun shows and/or private sales. Federal law says in those situations, if you're not a gun dealer or generally engaged in the gun business that you simply can't sell to someone who you suspect cannot have the gun, which is pretty vague.

Unrelated to that but relevent to this thread:

http://www.theonion.com/articles/62y...n-natio,30984/

Tony_SS 01-23-2013 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray (Post 459782)
I was talking about gun shows and/or private sales. Federal law says in those situations, if you're not a gun dealer or generally engaged in the gun business that you simply can't sell to someone who you suspect cannot have the gun, which is pretty vague.

Ok, but there are no 'gun show loopholes'. That is a political term like 'assault' rifle.

At a gun show, you purchase from a dealer the same way you would at their storefront. A background check is done. Now, a private sale, a check does not need to be done, its private. But there are laws against selling to a known felon, so its seller beware. This differs state to state and is legitimate.

Think about all the millions and millions of guns in the country. Gun ownership is skyrocketing and FBI statics tells us that violent crime rate has dropped almost 50% in the last 20 years. That is huge! We don't need more laws, or govt intervention. /soapbox.
:cheers:

transam 01-23-2013 10:21 AM

http://i1035.photobucket.com/albums/...a076bf7648.jpg

NOPANTS68 01-23-2013 11:06 AM

Now that's a classic image. lol

Ketzer 01-23-2013 01:06 PM

I have recieved email responses from my senator, congressman, representative here in Tennessee, all in support of not banning or changing current laws. (at least that is the form letter in response to me saying I will not vote for your a$$ if you go along...). I've voted on a half dozen online polls about it (Fox, USA, etc.) and they all show results in the 75-95% against banning or adding new laws. Yet Washington is saying there is "strong" support for these measures to be taken... support from WHOM?!? The police have shown they don't support it. Folks in the military don't support it. Only female democrats and the british seem to want it...


Jeff-

parsonsj 01-23-2013 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff
Washington is saying there is "strong" support for these measures to be taken... support from WHOM?!?

Here's a link to CNN polling data:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...iref=allsearch

Bucketlist2012 01-23-2013 01:38 PM

814 people polled ? That CNN report doesn't reflect that many people and the % is actually decreasing in support of Gun control


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net