Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Project Updates (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   1969 Torino (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=10645)

Panteracer 12-01-2013 09:47 AM

1969 Tornio
 
Rob
Never thought of that one
My QuickTime may get the same Surgery
Now the damn headers still hang way too low
Might have to get a set made that tuck up

Panteracer NorCal Bob

INTMD8 12-01-2013 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 519788)
Bob

As of this afternoon the Quicktime is now exactly the same height as the frame rails from the ground. :unibrow:

Nothing will be lower than the frame rails.

You aren't making it easier to build headers! What size primaries, 2"?

fleet 12-01-2013 11:15 AM

Nice slicing Rob. :thumbsup:

Reminds me of the Bass-O-Matic's slicing power.

http://blog.silver-peak.com/wp-conte...omatic-new.jpg


intocarss 12-01-2013 06:08 PM

^^^^ Cosmo going old school :flag2:

Panteracer 12-01-2013 06:24 PM

1969 Torino
 
So wondering about your dry sump
I help my buddy with his Can Am car
and we heat the oil for 20 minutes before
we start it. So you have a smaller tank
Like the LS motors??? Not sure how it works
with a street car??

Panteracer. NorCal Bob

FETorino 12-01-2013 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by INTMD8 (Post 519836)
You aren't making it easier to build headers! What size primaries, 2"?

Jim You know nothing on these cars is easy.:faint: 2"/2.25 stepped primaries. I guarantee they will not be one piece units.

Quote:

Originally Posted by compos mentis (Post 519840)
Nice slicing Rob. :thumbsup:

Reminds me of the Bass-O-Matic's slicing power.

Were you at the shop watching me cut it. :headscratch: Cuz you are probably spot on with that clip.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panteracer (Post 519906)
So wondering about your dry sump
I help my buddy with his Can Am car
and we heat the oil for 20 minutes before
we start it. So you have a smaller tank
Like the LS motors??? Not sure how it works
with a street car??

Panteracer. NorCal Bob

Bob

My tank is a used Peterson ALMS unit, 4 gallon capacity. Here is one of GWs favorite blurry photos of it.:_paranoid

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...a/ALMStank.jpg

On the dyno 12 quarts got the oil level where we wanted it. In the car the lines will be longer so I'm sure I'll be adding a quart or more.

You can start it without pre heating. Warm up time with 12+ quarts of oil may be a little while. I'm going to run a C&R radiator with a heat exchanger for the oil. We'll see what the morning warm up time is like without pre heating. I will have a heat probe in the tank and will add an external heat band if needed.

So as of now I don't know any more about the oil warm up than you.:lol:
:cheers:

Lenie 12-01-2013 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 519788)
Bob

As of this afternoon the Quicktime is now exactly the same height as the frame rails from the ground. :unibrow:

Nothing will be lower than the frame rails.

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps5d449deb.jpg

:cheers:

Been there done that!:unibrow:

Ron Sutton 12-02-2013 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 519568)
Ron is a wealth of information and a very gracious and helpful guy. I am hesitant to speak with him anymore because I always come away from the conversation wanting to change something.:lol: :bang: :lol:

That will teach you ! :lmao:

.

Ron Sutton 12-02-2013 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 519788)
Bob

As of this afternoon the Quicktime is now exactly the same height as the frame rails from the ground. :unibrow:

Nothing will be lower than the frame rails.

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps5d449deb.jpg

My quicktime bellhousing is cut the same. Did it in the mill.

Ron Sutton 12-02-2013 09:51 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Hey Guys,

Rob & I already discussed this on the phone, but I figured I'd catch up the details for anyone following along.


Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 518687)
Ron

You didn't expect a technical discussion with this crowd on this thread did you:headscratch:
No ... not in my wildest dreams. :)


Great seeing you at the Lat G party and at Optima. Sorry I missed Phx.
It was great meeting you and a lot of guys on from Lat G. The party was fun.
Even my racing buddy Randy that tagged along had fun.


Time for some brake tech:topic:


Previously on the forum you had run some brake calculations for me that are now slightly out the window. As I progressed on my engine setback project I abandoned my swing pedals and dual master setup. Buried a few post back under the ribbing you can see I posted about it.

I purchased a set of floor pedals but as with all floor pedals their ratio is limited. They are 5.75 to 1 at best so using the 100lbs std driver force there is an obvious loss in clamping force.

My floor pedals have a .875 and .813 master cylinders. Intuitively I would think with the lower pedal ratio of 5.75 maybe I should be running the .813 master for the front and a .750 for the rear to raise the line pressure and achieve a total braking force closer to 4000.

I also understand we could achieve more braking force through the use of a higher COF pad.

Intuitively doesn't make for much of a scientific discussion so plugging in the master sizes and new pedal ratio into your chart would be the best starting point for a discussion.

I also understand that setting my overall suspension parameters, either tweener or high travel, will also dictate what brake bias 65/35 or 70/30 we are targeting.


Based on the front suspension travel I think you'll end up with, you will probably need around 70% front braking.

The cool thing with adjustable bias in the pedals is you can fine tune the bias to perfection without giving up any total braking force. (Unlike a proportioning valve which reduces braking force).

Changing from the planned 6-1 pedal ratio to 5.75-1 is a small change. Only a 4% reduction in fact. That does not dictate a MC change, as that would produce a much larger increase, of about 16%.

As you can see from my calcs below, dropping 1 step on both M/Cs puts it over 4000# of braking force, which in my experience is too much braking force for a mid-to-high travel suspension strategy. I think you'll find 3562# is plenty of braking force.

------------------------------------------------------

On another note, I do these calcs based on 100# of leg force at the pedal. In the racing world, we "tune & adjust" braking to fit the driver all the time. 100# is just a starting baseline #.

For smaller drivers ... I have raced cars with champion female drivers that weighed 100# and male drivers as young as 12 that weighed 72# ... I designed a brake package that decreased the amount of leg force required.

We don't want the pedal to be too hard to push, or you wear the driver out over long races ... and you don't want it to be too easy to push ... making it too easy to lock up the brakes. In then end, it's all about tailoring it to the driver.

For those of you who haven't met Rob, he's a big fella. So Rob, I'm thinking you pushing the brake pedal with 100# of force will be easy. I feel we need to be concerned that we don't make the brakes too easy for you to lock up.

Let's start with what I originally outlined but with the 5.75-1 pedals ... making 3562# total braking at 100# of leg pressure ... and see how the braking characteristics fit you. We'll "tune & adjust" to your tastes after you and the car get up to speed. :cheers:



Panteracer 12-02-2013 10:28 AM

1969 Torino
 
Rob,
I think if you only have 12-13 quarts with the heat
exchanger you should be ok.. My pantera has 10 quarts
and my water to oil cooler actually helps warm things
up fairly quickly.. I was worried about it when I autocrossed
it a few times as oil temp does not get that hot on
your first runs.. but the gauge told me it works

Panteracer Norcal Bob

Sieg 12-02-2013 10:36 AM

This is getting way too complicated!

http://i850.photobucket.com/albums/a...neBraking1.jpg

Panteracer 12-02-2013 12:24 PM

1969 Torino
 
Sieg,
I agree.. I remember when all I had to remember
was the + and the - for the coil.. now with all the
plumbing, wiring, pumps,relays etc what a pain and
I don't even have fuel injection.. don't get me
started on that issue

I miss simple

Panteracer Norcal Bob

Sieg 12-02-2013 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panteracer (Post 520027)
Sieg,
I agree.. I remember when all I had to remember
was the + and the - for the coil.. now with all the
plumbing, wiring, pumps,relays etc what a pain and
I don't even have fuel injection.. don't get me
started on that issue

I miss simple

Panteracer Norcal Bob

Does it have fuel and what's the track record! LOL

That was a totally sarcastic picture!

I absolutely love what Ron is contributing to those who want to learn what it really takes to make a car work right.......and beyond just throwing money at the project. Tweaking stock pick up points and modifying stock parts can return similar performance in many cases and leave people :headscratch: Think Smokey Yunick :D Personally I really like that approach.

Back in my desert racing days I remember getting beat by guy's that were on what appeared to be an identical bike to mine and wondering wtf!? That was before I really had an understanding (clue) of suspension set-up and valving modifications. I rode a fellow competitor's bike one day and a migraine inducing light came on......He's Cheating!.....oh wait there's no rule class against those mods. :sieg:

Sieg 12-02-2013 07:32 PM

http://www.carcraft.com/editorial/13.../photo_01.html

:underchair:

GregWeld 12-02-2013 07:35 PM

Reminds me of high school --- one guy puts a too big four barrel on his otherwise stock POS…

I'd tweak the curve on my distributor -- and cream 'em…. and they're then all talking about buying headers…. In the meantime their stock cam and too big four barrel didn't need it…

HAHAHAHAHAHA


Sometimes the guys on a "budget" do more with less and leave the high priced parts guys in the dust.

INTMD8 12-02-2013 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sieg (Post 520113)

Hmm, check out the rock like substance in the water jackets. Maybe it's so old it has petrified?

FETorino 12-02-2013 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Sutton (Post 520001)
My quicktime bellhousing is cut the same. Did it in the mill.

Yea me too:rolleyes: Well maybe it was a Makita and a cut off wheel. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Sutton (Post 520006)
Hey Guys,

Rob & I already discussed this on the phone, but I figured I'd catch up the details for anyone following along.



Let's start with what I originally outlined but with the 5.75-1 pedals ... making 3562# total braking at 100# of leg pressure ... and see how the braking characteristics fit you. We'll "tune & adjust" to your tastes after you and the car get up to speed. :cheers:


[/COLOR]

Thanks Ron. It is a great benefit for anyone contemplating setting up any part of their car for you to weigh in on the reasons for making specific choices. I really enjoy the technical explanations of why.:idea:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Panteracer (Post 520009)
Rob,
I think if you only have 12-13 quarts with the heat
exchanger you should be ok.. My pantera has 10 quarts
and my water to oil cooler actually helps warm things
up fairly quickly.. I was worried about it when I autocrossed
it a few times as oil temp does not get that hot on
your first runs.. but the gauge told me it works

Panteracer Norcal Bob

Real world testing will answer that question for sure. I can't wait to find out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sieg (Post 520113)

:twak: Rude :twak: Rude :twak:

You should know better Sieg :buttkick: :lol:

Quote:

Originally Posted by INTMD8 (Post 520118)
Hmm, check out the rock like substance in the water jackets. Maybe it's so old it has petrified?

Don't you have a 54 year old 390 to finish. :mock:

Yea low budget drag racer filling the bottom half of the blocks water passages with concrete to strengthen it. I wonder how much hp he was putting down for those 350 passes before it grenaded.

At least it went out in style.:wow:

:cheers:

GregWeld 12-03-2013 06:24 AM

I push on the brake pedal --- if I need more brakes… I push harder or for longer… if I push too much they lock up.

That's a simple "leg bias" system I've developed.

FETorino 12-07-2013 11:56 AM

Back to work moving things down and back.

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...pseec3b28d.jpghttp://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps702cd71c.jpghttp://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps6efe18d2.jpghttp://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps2787ed9c.jpghttp://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...psbb97c60d.jpg

jarhead 12-07-2013 12:36 PM

i am crying elephant tears...:confused59:
Please ship to 80524

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps702cd71c.jpg

FETorino 12-07-2013 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wanman (Post 521270)
i am crying elephant tears...:confused59:
Please ship to 80524

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps702cd71c.jpg

No Joe you can't have it. :guns:

It will eventually be welded back in now that the motor and transmission has been moved back 7.5".:D

I have the stock tunnel cross brace I drilled the spot welds out of and removed if you want one of those.

Does it make more sense now, why, it temporarily came out?

:cheers:

jarhead 12-07-2013 04:15 PM

I figured you had a reason to :superhack: the beautiful RS work :gitrdun:

Flash68 12-07-2013 09:30 PM

too much progress... slow down would ya? :sieg:

DaleTx 12-07-2013 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 521423)
too much progress... slow down would ya? :sieg:

Yeah... and the pictures are a little bit to crisp and focused... maybe next time cover the lens part way with you finger!

Seriously... the work on the tunnel is looking good :thumbsup:

INTMD8 12-08-2013 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 521290)

It will eventually be welded back in now that the motor and transmission has been moved back 7.5".:D

How is engine placement in relation to front wheel centerline now?

FETorino 12-08-2013 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by INTMD8 (Post 521483)
How is engine placement in relation to front wheel centerline now?

This gives you a good idea. The balancer is behind the rack and the front of the block is at or just behind the front axle.:D

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...pse8e162a2.jpg

Ron in SoCal 12-08-2013 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 521486)
This gives you a good idea. The balancer is behind the rack and the front of the block is at or just behind the front axle.:D

You have front axles? Man I gotta get over to the shop and see this!

:lol: :cheers:

intocarss 12-08-2013 01:22 PM

I thought you were running dual quads??

FETorino 12-08-2013 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron in SoCal (Post 521503)
You have front axles? Man I gotta get over to the shop and see this!

:lol: :cheers:

OK fact checker you know what I mean. :twak:

It's like referring to the KPI, King Pin Inclination of your spindle when you don't have a Kingpin.:mock:

You can still find reference to portions of a spindle as an axle :lmao: :lol: :lmao:

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...psd986f2d4.gif

Quote:

Originally Posted by intocarss (Post 521507)
I thought you were running dual quads??

JerDog. Eventually.

I ran both setups on the dyno. My 701hp on E85 was made with a single 4150.

Back to back on Gas the first weekend on the dyno we got close to 25hp more with the dual quad over a single Dominator and about 35hp more than the single 4150. I don't own, or have access to a pair to borrow, of properly set up dual E85 carbs so I don't know what the E85 single vs dual quad hp difference would be. I'm sure the duals would also make more hp on E85. The intake is just a better overall design.

One day when the bleeding of $$ slows I'll build a matched set of E85s for the dual quad and it will go on the car. Just for the cool factor if nothing else. For now I'm just running my single 4150.

:cheers:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps1ec06523.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps7b22f07b.jpg

GrabberGT 12-08-2013 02:53 PM

Im asking Santa for new valve covers. What kind are those? Maybe I'll get lucky and he can deliver them with a motor attached.

Flash68 12-08-2013 02:58 PM

I thought we agreed no more pics of that scary gimp holding cell :eek:

Run the duals. You know you want to. :bigun2:

FETorino 12-08-2013 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrabberGT (Post 521525)
Im asking Santa for new valve covers. What kind are those? Maybe I'll get lucky and he can deliver them with a motor attached.

Chris

You must have been really nice this year if you think Santa is putting a whole motor under your tree. :lmao:

The VCs are made by a buddy of Blairs. I think he is in North Carolina if I remember correctly. He makes them to order with breathers where you want them or with none like mine. He can also engrave whatever logo you want in them. They were more than the average VC but I'd have to look back to see how much.

When I was first shopping for VCs I saw a few set of nice looking Sheet Metal style covers available. For a SBF they should be pretty easy to come by. If you want I'll ask Blair for his guys contact info and send it to you.:thumbsup:

:cheers:

FETorino 12-08-2013 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 521528)
I thought we agreed no more pics of that scary gimp holding cell :eek:

Run the duals. You know you want to. :bigun2:

We agreed to NOTHING :buttkick: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Of course I want to run the duals. Other than an EFI weenie who wouldn't:lostmarbles: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...psd332aee7.jpg

GregWeld 12-08-2013 03:32 PM

That dyno room gives me goose bumps… and raises the hair on the back of my neck.




If I didn't know better -- I'd think you were 80+ years old… Dual Carbs? Really?
Last time I adjusted a carb it was on a cement mixer.

FETorino 12-08-2013 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregWeld (Post 521535)
That dyno room gives me goose bumps… and raises the hair on the back of my neck.




If I didn't know better -- I'd think you were 80+ years old… Dual Carbs? Really?
Last time I adjusted a carb it was on a cement mixer.

Thank you for seeing signs of "the greatest generation" in me. That's the nicest thing you could say.:)

And now for a quick time out from this build thread so I can :soapbox:

:flag2: For those of you who don't appreciate what you have or why you have it; that is the generation that, as Tom Brokaw wrote in his 1998 book:

"it is, I believe, the greatest generation any society has ever produced." "these men and women fought not for fame and recognition, but because it was the right thing to do."

They took us out fo the depression and put our country at the pinnacle of the world in their time.

If any of you get a chance hang out with an 80+ year old for an afternoon and learn something.:thumbsup: They will probably tell you how to rebuild this country:flag2:

and

maybe even how to tune a set of dual quads.:)

I'm a big fan of hanging out with old geezers.:geezer:

:topic: And now back to our regular programming.:action-smiley-027:

GW

It hurts when you refer to that Yellow Mustang as a "cement mixer". You know deep down inside you aren't an EFi weenie and love your carbs.:lmao:

Remember every-time you get out of that Lotus EFI gokart and back into the Mustang you get goosebumps and the hair on your neck stand up when you mash the skinny pedal and hear the butterflies in the carb open.

Now you know why you feel that way when you look at that picture.:action-smiley-027:

:cheers:

GregWeld 12-08-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 521544)
GW

It hurts when you refer to that Yellow Mustang as a "cement mixer". You know deep down inside you aren't an EFi weenie and love your carbs.:lmao:




Well I walked into that one didn't I…

Vegas69 12-08-2013 04:33 PM

It's like arguing that the outhouse is superior to indoor plumbing.:lol:

Ron in SoCal 12-08-2013 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 521552)
It's like arguing that the outhouse is superior to indoor plumbing.:lol:

And for the record, there is no such thing as an EFI weenie.

:lmao: :lmao:

intocarss 12-08-2013 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FETorino (Post 521524)
OK fact checker you know what I mean. :twak:

It's like referring to the KPI, King Pin Inclination of your spindle when you don't have a Kingpin.:mock:

You can still find reference to portions of a spindle as an axle :lmao: :lol: :lmao:

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...psd986f2d4.gif



JerDog. Eventually.

I ran both setups on the dyno. My 701hp on E85 was made with a single 4150.

Back to back on Gas the first weekend on the dyno we got close to 25hp more with the dual quad over a single Dominator and about 35hp more than the single 4150. I don't own, or have access to a pair to borrow, of properly set up dual E85 carbs so I don't know what the E85 single vs dual quad hp difference would be. I'm sure the duals would also make more hp on E85. The intake is just a better overall design.

One day when the bleeding of $$ slows I'll build a matched set of E85s for the dual quad and it will go on the car. Just for the cool factor if nothing else. For now I'm just running my single 4150.

:cheers:
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps1ec06523.jpg
http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...ps7b22f07b.jpg

REAL MEN TUNE WITH A SCREWDRIVER,,,, NOT A LAPTOP :flag2: :thumbsup:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net