[QUOTE=69hugger;698230]I was kinda hoping Charlie was going to spend the money on the R&D for an S10 chassis as I would have considered building another one.

Well i guess I will have to build a 67 Camaro next

Had one, too damn small inside for me, and the steering wheels is right there!!all the time, had the motor, trans,rear, etc had to get rid of it, even had a 2.8 Camaro HO motor, it would move for a little truck with a little motor,

Nice truck Charlie, might be a little tight in the cab........

Engine cart
 

Is the engine cart something you or Sled Alley fabbed up? Need more info and cool project ....:popcorn2:

New 20 gallon gas tank. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...8cf83a72b0.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...edc210bcc0.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...eefa9e4330.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...190b1a3647.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So way back in the day when I had a few dozen Syclones & Typhoons. There was a TSB on the Syclone gas tank. Under Hard Acceleration with the fuel below 1/4 tank there would be starvation issue.

and i am enjoying watching this build as one day I will build another one or just buys yours.

Pretty sure all GM vehicles had fuel issues if you took the tank below 1/4 tank during that era, Marty. If it wasn't fuel starvation it was fuel pump burn out. I've had GM almost my entire life. I rarely ever let the fuel get low enough to turn the low lamp on because of this. Hell, with my 96 Formula, I rarely went below 1/4 tank because of the issues with GM pumps. Terrible design looking back on it, but that's growing pains and learning about fuel injection.

Hush let's keep that quiet as there is a better chance of me being able to scoop it up after it's finished.