![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i think what you guys are not understanding is that 8sec 170mph street cars are a dime a dozen, change a few things and a couple of extra miles and alot of money and wahla! it may not be safe, the driver is probably stupid or ignorant or what ever but it can be done. the point is most people here on this board do it safley with proper enginering and such but the reality is, most people don't.
|
200 is slow, how about 400
This guy parked next to us at Bonneville http://www.scta-bni.org/news/411.wmv |
Quote:
http://www.roadsters.com/jolliffe.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you really want to see what you're up against, look at this Road & Track Standing Mile test from 2005 where they ran 13 cars and a bike over a standing mile. http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=1 A very aerodynamic Jaguar Trans Am racecar only went in the 170s and to get a little more aero, they removed the rear wing and the driver said it was spinning the rear tires at the 180 and couldn't pick up another mph. And that was a very slippery, purpose-built, high speed, roadrace car. The only 3 cars to break 200 were a Champ Car, A TT Saleen S7 and a 1000hp TT Viper which are all infinitely more aerodynamic than a stock Chevelle. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net