Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Race Cars and Modern Pro-Street (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=57)
-   -   Greg Weld's 65 Mustang fastback track car (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=33796)

Flash68 08-06-2014 11:26 PM

4.082 bore x 3.4 stroke = 355.963

356 FTW!

GregWeld 08-07-2014 06:06 AM

Thanks Dave! The paperwork is down at the shop so I couldn't go find it. That's the problem with a shop where you can't just walk out your back door! Everything you need is there when you're not!


356 is it.


FWIW -- They dyno the motor to 7500 and I know I've never gotten near that. No good reason why it shouldn't be bullet proof.

Vegas69 08-07-2014 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flash68 (Post 564383)
4.082 bore x 3.4 stroke = 355.963

356 FTW!

And we thought he was a just a numb nuts that married up...

SSLance 08-07-2014 08:39 AM

I know this probably won't be the popular opinion on this board (given all of the 7,000 rpm engines on jack stands around here :D ), but I'm of the opinion that an engine that makes peak power at a lower RPM is easier to drive on the track than a higher revving engine.

Here's my case... It's easier to get on and off the gas smoothly at say 3000-4000 rpm than at 6500 rpm... This leads to less surprising of the tires and more maintaining of grip easier.

My little truck motor that makes peak power between 2000 and 4000 RPM is a dream to drive, you just have to shift into a higher gear faster. It may get outrun on the straights a bit...but when back in the twistys it makes it all back up again by keeping the rear tires under the car instead of having to pedal it every time out of a corner. Plus (and this is a BIG plus) it's a LOT easier on all of the parts not twisting them so high lap after lap after lap...

Just a thought... Sorry you broke your car Greg, hopefully the carnage is minimal and it'll be back on the track soon.

GregWeld 08-07-2014 09:45 AM

For road racing I like high revving motors and don't want a torque motor... it's easier to drive at high speeds with a motor that's not trying to break the tires loose on exit. Nothing sounds better than a high revving stroker motor screaming for mercy. Not saying the 355 isn't making torque...





http://i919.photobucket.com/albums/a...ar/Mustang.jpg

GregWeld 08-07-2014 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 564417)
And we thought he was a just a numb nuts that married up...







It didn't change my opinion of him one bit......

Sieg 08-07-2014 10:23 AM

Certainly looks reliable......
http://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-G...Gp5MMzT-XL.jpg

GregWeld 08-07-2014 10:39 AM

That SOB has the death rattle.....

Flash68 08-07-2014 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69 (Post 564417)
And we thought he was a just a numb nuts that married up...

Keeping thinking that because it's true! :thankyou:

Vince@Meanstreets 08-07-2014 02:10 PM

Greg, that line running over the header area, that's a return line no, or is it to a fuel gauge isolator?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net