![]() |
C6 Suspension and Drivetrain under a 1969 Camaro under construction @ Ironworks.
Alright Guys I have been holding out on your for alittle bit. We got a 1969 Camaro body in here a few month ago on a pallet. After doing an initial mock up of the car, we decided on running 335 20's in the rear and 285-19's in the front, Like a ZR-1 Corvette. The customer supplied the C6 transaxle from RPM transmission. Here is the initial mock up.
The Overall Tire sizes are not exact since we dont have 335/25/20's just laying around, but you will catch the vibe we are going for. http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...ockup19-20.jpg http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...uarterview.jpg As you can see the blue tape stripe on the bottom of the rocker, we decided that wedge sectioning the car 1" would give us the desired stance. By doing this we made the bottom of the rocker, the door gap and the speedline of the front fender all parallel and level at ride height. We made the cut inbetween the door hinges. Here are some pics. http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...009pics001.jpg The cut through the door http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...009pics013.jpg The door reinstalled http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...009pics015.jpg More to come, Enjoy |
Once we had the car mocked up on the table at ride height we started mocking up the basics of the car to get and game plan for the floor and front suspension pickup points.
http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...19-2009004.jpg Just a mock up engine we had laying around. http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...-9-2009027.jpg We landed the engine where the bell housing line is even with the windshield wipers, if that gives you an idea of how far we set the engine back. About 4 inches. :D http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...-9-2009025.jpg |
Then we started to lay out the design for the floor and how we would incorporate the suspension design for the pick up points into this. So we decided to build the main framerail structure inside the rocker to act as the frame rails that would go inside the Rocker and build low profile crossmembers that would be even with the bottom of the rocker. So nothing would hang below the rocker. Plus the design of these allows our floor to be 2" below the stock height of the original floor. Plus it will give us tons of lateral support and resist chassis flex. :thumbsup:
Paper mock up from the blue print printer. http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...11-2009010.jpg Crossmember jig fixture http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...30-2009030.jpg Floor mocked up on table http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...30-2009041.jpg http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...30-2009044.jpg Mocking up the Floor in the car http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t...30-2009034.jpg We should begin to start bending tubes and getting the lower suspension pick up points located in the next few weeks. Enjoy |
You guys do amazing work Rodger! Thanks for the update! What's the plans for the interior...Vette like?
|
No idea on the interior not even a clue, YET. We are still working on the Suspension pick up points and push rod suspension designs.
|
question
rodger
cool stuff... is the exhaust going to run above the torque tube? because i see the extra space you built in above the torque tube and no other humps in the crossmembers . you guys look busy..congrats :thumbsup: tom |
Since the rocker taper wider to the front we just then plates the same width to trim to fit and they need to be set down. Man that would be a wall not a console if it was that high.
We are pretty busy, But everybody has less money to spend these days but they still have big dreams. So we have to work on more cars at one time to do the same dollar amount each month and the work on the cars gets done at the pace the customer money comes flowing in. We are lucky alot of people are choosing to have us do work on their cars, weather it is just certain aspects of Full tilt turn key builds. Work is work and we will do whatever it it takes. Thanks Rodger |
Quote:
That '69 is going to be one sick ride. The fabrication looks so amazing already! Keep us posted.:hail: :thumbsup: |
I love your work man, keep it up :thumbsup:
You're way of fabricating these chassis inspires my design aspects on my next chassis. |
Quote:
|
Well Kendall my scarp guy gives me 600 bucks every other month for a big old dumpster of scarp metal. If you can beat that, the scrap metal is all yours.
You can ask anybody who knows me, I never ever stop thinking about design ideas and ways to run my business. I cannot fall asleep until Im just totally worn out at night. And now that we are working our summer schedule of 5am til quiting time I don't get out of here till 6:30 - 7pm just like winter time. Long days I suppose, But I could not imagine putting in this effort into something I did not "EAT, SLEEP, & BREATHE". We come in early due to the heat. Rodger |
Yeah those are some loooong days! Your bride must be pretty understanding! Good to hear all is well down there!! I think you and your team have a great attitude! :cheers:
|
I cant wait to see this car done! You guys put a lot of care into the cars you build.
|
Looking forward to watching the progress on this build .I can never get enough of watching what all you guys on this forum do on a daily basis..Truly amazing stuff:thumbsup:
|
Quote:
|
Trans/diff Specs
I decided I wanted something a little different so after discussing this with Rodney the owner of RPM TRANSMISSIONS in Daleville, Indiana we decided to build a set up equivalent to the ZR1 with a couple of extras.
Tremec TR6060- ZR1 specified with RPM Stage V set up. Full micropolish of all internal components, Cryogenically treated internals, modified 1 & 2 shift forks, bronze fork pads, extreme duty pump modification to improve cooling and fluid flow. Differential- 3.42 Quaife equipped RPM Stage 3, full micropolish of gear set, hardened 300M left shaft modified to fit Quaife, hardened 300M 2piece right shaft, internal lube system modifications |
Roger i was curious to see what sort of analysis you do on any of your chassis?
And if so, how do you go about it? |
Well It is not as glorified as you might think but it seems to work pretty well. I guess. I scratch the top of my head, then the right side of my belly button and then scratch my head again.
But I'm currently build 3 cars for 3 different mechanical engineers and I usually ask them what they think and do they see any weak points. The weak points get bigger diameter or thicker material. I guess just common sense and smart friends. Alot of my customers become involved in all the build in my shop in some way or another. A good majority of my customer eat sleep and breathe the build more then the actual end result just like me. I'm actually looking at trying to higher a full time suspension designer with an engineering degree. He will be doing all the suspension design work with me after Columbus on this project. I just need to figure out how to swing that money. Not sure if that answers your question or not. |
No it doesnt
The thing is how do you know it works well, and if your improving on each set up you do? You know what im saying Making it better each time round. |
Hey Rodger can you promise us one thing When TLC or some other show sees what you can do and offers you $$$ you don't turn into a freakshow like the rest.:thumbsup:
Seriously though I am going to go out on a limb ands say a Ridler is in the cards for you and your team someday:hail: |
Then what kind of Analysis are you talking? Stress analysis or suspension analysis? The stress analysis can be done through Solidworks. The suspension analysis we have been working with some engineers and just some smart guys I know. I have had some Hot Rod front suspension spec from some guys alot smarter then me and we have been running with those numbers. But we are now working to improve things even further then that.
Here is an email from some things we are looking into on the C5 suspension. So I just got done running a few simulations with the C5 Corvette Hardpoints that you emailed to me. The only other thing that would be nice is if I had more accurate Anti Roll Bar hardpoints. Something I found over the past year is that in keeping those motion ratios linear, you can drastically improve the handling of the vehicle. Some quick notes I have on the C5 chassis: For Longitudinal Case (3 degrees pitch braking, 3" travel, then 3 degrees acceleration, 2" travel) Camber looks very good in this situation, appears to be the main focus of this car. Toe needs serious help - 1.3 degrees toe out in front under breaking (should toe in), rear stays within .7 degrees which isn't bad. Track change isn't bad, the track increases on the side that's being loaded- good for stability. Wheel/Shock Motion ratios look not too bad, but something that can be improved with rockers- also, can make them with a rising spring rate to help the car become stiffer as its loaded - all dependent on the springs though. Roll Center height looks okay except for full breaking, it does go below ground. Having a Higher RCH would help this and can be done a number of ways, I'd be curious to see what happens in a C5 with you mash on the brakes all the way then cut the wheel... Pitch center looks really good- migrates less than 13", less than 15% the wheelbase, it is pretty high though- probably to make the car more responsive under braking and accel without sacrificing ride characteristics... Now for the Lateral Case - Go into a ~ 1.5 G turn (4 degree roll) and simultaneously turning the steering wheel 60 degrees. Camber looks okay in the front - due to the similar amount of KPI and Castor, not much camber gain on the outside (.3 deg) so the can be improved a lot, just by adding a little bit of castor, but it all depends on what the tire wants, It may not be that camber sensitive in that case we shouldn't even look at camber. Rear camber looks bad, depending on what the tire wants - outside wheel goes way positive (3 degrees) and inside goes way negative (-4 degrees) This is probably why I see a lot of people setting these cars up with so much negative camber in the rear. This can definitely be improved and make a huge difference on track. Toe change is fairly mild- rear moves to create oversteering moment, front is pro ackerman with about 2 degrees difference - seems pretty good. Starts at about 103% and moves to 133% which makes sense if this car is running on radials. Track change in rear is near nothing and okay in the front- could stand to go a bit wider under compression. Roll center heights stay damn near the same in roll, and migration is 2 inches inside on the front and 2.4" inside in the rear (less than 4% the track width). This seems to be the large focus of the suspension design as this is what looks the best. Overall I can see where these cars get their good handling characteristics, but there is a ton of things that can be done to improve it, from a kinematics perspective. I'm curious to see how this differs from the C6 setup and if they made any geometry changes for the ZR-1. Let me know what you think. Bobby Alley Chief Engineer Sooner Racing Team So like I said, I may not be that smart but I know some guys who are. Someday we will be able to track test some of these projects and show beyond the drawing board the functionality that they work better then we can probably drive. At the end of the day the best mod you can do to your suspension is put slicks on. All this time looking for the unicorn of suspension geometry perfection changes with every car. Plus is anybody on this site going to beat on their car enough to justify all the effort we put into geometry. Probably not, but it sure is fun. Rodger |
"Stress analysis or suspension analysis? The stress analysis can be done through Solidworks."
Your building Chassis man you should be doing every possible analysis that should be done. I know you CAN do things in Solidworks, but are you? And not just Frame rails... You can only do with what you know.maybe when you finish Johns car you could do some proper testing which will give you real feedback on Street tyres Im trying to figure out the product you offer and its benefits |
Quote:
We are bunch of young guys trying everyday to build the baddest most functional stuff we can. The problem is it takes 1000's of hours to build a car to the level of some of these projects in our shop. I'm going to go out on a lib and guess that the clients we build cars for trust us and respect our knowledge and abilities. Are we the master of solidworks? Nope Do I know some guys who are? YEAH. Ever heard of MARS or an F-16? Did I ever claim to know it all? Nope. Could we improve on every trade done in my shop? I hope so or I have no reason to show up tommorrow. Yes, we plan to test and tune Johns nova someday. But at the end of the day what will that prove? There are a ton of legendary cars built that have never proven or done anything to live up to the hipe or mythical legend the magazines created them to be. And tons have fallen on their face in front of God and everyone. So let me ask what do you use for grammer check? Thanks :D |
Quote:
AS far as the 69, C6 IRS set up, we are talking new territory, most builds to date have been C5 based including the trans setup. When you take the C6 rear/trans combo all pick up points are different than C5 including track width, tranny mounting points, a arms, etc. |
Rodger --
I don't care if this stuff ever gets tested! It's the baddest, koolest looking stuff going! I have lots of tools - I sure wish I had the talent to use 'em like you guys do! Best, Greg Weld |
:thumbsup: X2 What Greg said. Except I doubt I have as many tools......
The projects that come rolling out of your shop are inspiring to many. I don't know how hard any of these will ever be pushed or tested, but it really does not matter. If you are giving the customer what they want, that is the product you offer and the benefits are many. Keep it up! |
That is a great thought process for the frame and floors Rodger. What are you going to do for a hood, etc with the engine placement that high? The valve covers appear to be about even with the hood hinges! I can't wait to see this one transpire, like all the other projects in your shop. :yes:
|
regarding stress calcs, current production cars have huge torsional rigidity, I wonder what these custome frame body combos work out at
found some figures online Aston Martin DB9 Coupe 27,000 Nm/deg Aston Martin DB9 Convertible 15,500 Nm/deg Audi TT Coupe 19,000 Nm/deg BMW E36 Touring 10,900 Nm/deg BMW E36 Z3 5,600 Nm/deg BMW E46 Sedan (w/o folding seats) 18,000 Nm/deg BMW E46 Sedan (w/folding seats) 13,000 Nm/deg BMW E46 Wagon (w/folding seats) 14,000 Nm/deg BMW E46 Coupe (w/folding seats) 12,500 Nm/deg BMW E46 Convertible 10,500 Nm/deg Chrysler Crossfire 20,140 Nm/deg Chrysler Durango 6,800 Nm/deg Dodge Viper Coupe 7,600 Nm/deg Ferrari 360 Spider 8,500 Nm/deg Ford GT40 MkI 17,000 Nm/deg Ford Mustang 2003 16,000 Nm/deg Ford Mustang 2005 21,000 Nm/deg Ford Mustang Convertible (2003) 4,800 Nm/deg Ford Mustang Convertible (2005) 9,500 Nm/deg Jaguar X-Type Sedan 22,000 Nm/deg Jaguar X-Type Estate 16,319 Nm/deg Lambo Murcielago 20,000 Nm/deg Lotus Elan 7,900 Nm/deg Lotus Elan GRP body 8,900 Nm/deg Lotus Elise 10,000 Nm/deg Lotus Elise 111s 11,000 Nm/deg Lotus Esprit SE Turbo 5,850 Nm/deg McLaren F1 13,500 Nm/deg Mini (2003) 24,500 Nm/deg Pagani Zonda C12 S 26,300 Nm/deg Porsche 911 Turbo (2000) 13,500 Nm/deg Porsche 959 12,900 Nm/deg Volvo S60 20,000 Nm/deg Rolls Royce Phantom: 40,000 Nm/deg BMW E90: Supposedly 25% higher than E46, look above Audi A2: 11900 Nm/deg Audi A8: 25,000 Nm/deg Audi TT: 10,000 Nm/deg (22Hz) Golf V GTI: 25,000 Nm/deg Ferrari 360: 1,474 kgm/degree (bending: 1,032 kg/mm) Ferrari 355: 1,024 kgm/degree (bending: 727 kg/mm) Ferrari 430: supposedly 20% higher than 360 Renault Sport Spider: 10,000 Nm/degree Volvo S80: 18,600 Nm/deg Koenigsegg CC-8: 28,100 Nm/deg Porsche 911 Turbo 996: 27,000 Nm/deg Porsche 911 Turbo 996 Convertible: 11,600 Nm/deg Lotus Elise S2 Exige (2004): 10,500 Nm/deg Volkswagen Fox: 17,941 Nm/deg BMW Z4: 14,500 Nm/deg Ferrari F50: 34,600 Nm/deg Lambo Gallardo: 23000 Nm/deg Ford GT: 27,100 Nm/deg Mazda Rx-8: 30,000 Nm/deg :eyepop: (hard to believe) Mazda Rx-7: ~15,000 Nm/deg be fun to rig up some tests the really high end stuff is all over 20,000Nm/deg |
Quote:
The engine seems high when you take a 1" wedge out of the body and set the rocker to 5" of ground clearance. The transalxe is actually rotated to 1 degree dowm hill to lower the front center of gravity. With a rear spindle center of a 20" rim of course the transaxle will be higher then normal. We have some pretty slick ideas on the hood, If it is not obvious this car will be pretty custom. Reshaped fenders, reshaped tailpanel, Reshaped roof skin, Shortened nose. I have quite a few tricks up my sleeve on this car. See ya in Columbus. |
Quote:
Rodger |
Dave, awesome build - about time you/Ironworks posted up. Were you originally going to have a shop in the midwest build the car (Perfection Auto or...)? Looks like you're in good hands now...
:cool: |
Quote:
The car was at Perfection Autosport at the beginning getting certain items done. They also took care of eliminating my nice shade of yellow by the process of chemical acid dipping and ecoated some parts to date. I contacted Rodger about 4 months ago and started prepping for delievery and 2 months of me and Rodger throwing our ideas back and forth, to finally shipping the body to him. Ill see ya in Columbus. Dave |
Quote:
|
ROnworks, indirectly you've answered my question. Thank you
|
Floor Layout
Quote:
Tucking the exhaust in the tunnel below the torque tube will give your Camaro an AWESOME side profile...... no visible headers! --Eric |
Quote:
|
Quote:
--Eric |
Whoa! You guys are thinking out of the box more than I am.
Sorry Jeff, my definition of exotic was still LS based, maybe LS9, tom nelson engine, etc. But that would be trick though. Are you aware of the cost of a Lambo v10, ouch! |
Quote:
|
If you drive uphill on a 1 degree incline at all times, it will never have a problem.
:D :D :D |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net