Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Wheels and Tires (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   1969 (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=27073)

FP69 06-01-2010 02:10 PM

1969
 
I have a 69 camaro w/an aftermarket richmond 12 bolt and 4 link suspension. I am not interested in a mini tub and would like to put a 285 or 295 tire on the car. Boze wheels says a 18x10 with a 295 40 17 should fit?

I know a 17x9.5 w/a 5.5 back works because I have a set on one of my cars now. I need a bit bigger tire....any thoughts?

JayR 06-01-2010 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank Palmeri (Post 290062)
I have a 69 camaro w/an aftermarket richmond 12 bolt and 4 link suspension. I am not interested in a mini tub and would like to put a 285 or 295 tire on the car. Boze wheels says a 18x10 with a 295 40 17 should fit?

I know a 17x9.5 w/a 5.5 back works because I have a set on one of my cars now. I need a bit bigger tire....any thoughts?

A 295 will fit inside a mini tubbed car with miles to spare and is a wise idea if you don't want to go to the added expense of 12s with 335mm rubber but want something more aggressive than the stock wheelwells that hold 275s.

hifi875 06-01-2010 04:32 PM

i have 20x10 w285/30/20 on my 69. very very tight. 6inch back spacing. you have to watch for inner fender rubbing. and trim fender lips. mine will rub sometime when i turn in going up a hill and suspension will compress. i would go 9.5 probably if i had to do it again or mini tub it. just watch out.

Rybar 06-01-2010 05:04 PM

Frank, I'm running an 18x10 5.75" BS stock wells with 275-40-18 tire. The lips on the 1/4's are rolled and trimmed. It's a very tight fit as is, but my car sits quite low.

I have seen a few guys run 285's and 295's but I think you would have to have the back end sitting a bit higher, sprung stiffer and wheel backspacing has to nailed.

DriverzInc 06-01-2010 06:13 PM

275-285 is the most we can recommend with some trimming involved.

markos920 06-01-2010 06:30 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here is my 69 with 285-30-20 on 20x10, b/s 5.625 and rolled outer fender lip.

hifi875 06-01-2010 07:54 PM

dang that is sweet.

FP69 06-01-2010 08:09 PM

Thanks for the help..
Sounds like an 18x9.5 w/a 5.5 back space might do the trick and stay w/a 275 tire.

lowfat69 06-01-2010 09:08 PM

I too would like to fit a 295 on a 10" wide rim, if one was replacing both quarters could they be pumped out enough to clear, perhaps with some inner tub massaging at the same time. Any ideas?

Rybar 06-01-2010 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lowfat69 (Post 290113)
I too would like to fit a 295 on a 10" wide rim, if one was replacing both quarters could they be pumped out enough to clear, perhaps with some inner tub massaging at the same time. Any ideas?

Well while you are at it why not just mini-tub?

tones2SS 06-02-2010 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markos920 (Post 290097)
Here is my 69 with 285-30-20 on 20x10, b/s 5.625 and rolled outer fender lip.

Nice stance Markos!:thumbsup:

Josh69 06-10-2010 02:54 PM

I have 18x10s with 275's and I will rub sometimes on real hard transitions. When we installed the new quarters and outer wheelhouses, we trimmed them back as much as possible and welded them together, so my lip is about 1/4" wide.

I don't see how anyone could run much more tire than that without consequences or compromises. I only have a 2" drop spring in back (DSE).

I wish I would've mini-tubbed it back then, but may do so when I install a 4 link someday.

ArisESQ 06-16-2010 08:37 PM

i have an 18x10 with 5.75 inches back spacing and a 295. it fit, but barely, and i had to trim the hell out of the fender. i couldn't get the stance i wanted though, so i just went ahead and mini-tubbed the car and am now in the process of getting the wheels widened and rear end narrowed to accommodate a 315 or so.

just tub it or run a 275.

buickfunnycar.com 06-16-2010 09:29 PM

I also run a 18x10 rear on my '69 with 5.625" b/s and a 275/40 tire and my car eats that up whole,could have easily run a 285 or larger...but then again,my car's a freak.:willy:

I've put the 18x10 (5.75" b/s) & 305/35's off of my Chevelle and those fit with clearance...weird car I tell ya.

ArisESQ 06-23-2010 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by musclecarjohn (Post 292143)
I also run a 18x10 rear on my '69 with 5.625" b/s and a 275/40 tire and my car eats that up whole,could have easily run a 285 or larger...but then again,my car's a freak.:willy:

I've put the 18x10 (5.75" b/s) & 305/35's off of my Chevelle and those fit with clearance...weird car I tell ya.

I should clarify; I have a 67', so there is slightly less room under there.

are your fenders rolled or pulled at all?? a friend of mine with a 69 pulled his fenders slightly and he managed to fit a 295 at a pretty low stance, and he auto crosses frequently with little if any rubbing


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net