![]() |
Opinions on stance--pics added
3 Attachment(s)
Value your guys' opinions, wondering what your thoughts were on my Camaro's stance. I'm not sure if I'm completely happy with the current stance. Quick rundown on suspension mods.
KYB shocks/struts Spohn - Swaybars, Lower Control Arms, Panhard bar Hotchkis lowering springs Moog components TDS Wonderbar Edelbrock strut tower brace Plan to change to tubular A-Arms shortly Couple pics took few weeks ago. |
i think it would look better like an inch lower both front a rear to close up the tire to fender gap... youll probably have to shorten your air dam but thats really not any work, mine on my 93 TA scrapes everything but imo worth it for the look and its just the air dam that hidden under the car any ways.
|
It's sitting nice and level. How much shock travel do you have left?
|
I think most cars look better slightly lower in the front, maybe an inch or an inch and a half...
|
Quote:
Remember you have TWO ends to play with --- so up a half inch in back and down a half inch in front... would make a difference.... OR Do you want to get in the weeds? You didn't say what stance you're looking for. |
I drove a third gen for years and I can't imagine going much lower with the front spoiler. If you do go lower, maybe a 1/2 inch in the front. It would looks great if you could go down an inch in the back and 1.5 inches in the front, but I just don't see how you could drive it on the streets.
|
I agree with these guys. It looks nice and level, but if you could bring it down a bit, it would look much better.
Good luck man!:thumbsup: |
Quote:
Quote:
I'm thinking like most of you said, maybe another inch lower front/rear. Would I sacrifice drivability though? I could switch to Eibach springs and probably get about another 3/4 inch lower. Other options would be coilover conversion or Ridetech, which would definitely be alot more expensive right now. Greg, I like the in the weed stance, but those types of stances on third-gens tends to make the car not very driveable. My Camaro needs to be driveable. Trying to find a happy-medium I guess. |
Car looks good and practical for what you want to do with it,I say go out and enjoy yourself.:yes:
|
Looks clean and functional if that makes sense? It is not overstated and subtle, more drop in the front 1 inch may give ia more agressive look but sometimes less is more.
|
Thanks guys, appreciate your input.:cheers:
|
I used H&R springs that put the car on a little bit of a rake. I'm using Bilstein shocks but I don't think that makes much difference in ride height. I still have some wheel to fender gap (which was also one of my concerns). Maybe 22s and rubber band tires will fill the fender wells. :unibrow: Btw, the car is a '85 IROC.
|
Quote:
|
IMO For your car I prefer a lower stance, but I know exhaust clearance under the floors can be tight.
I think 3rd gens are very nice looking cars with the right stance and wheel/tire combo. |
Quote:
I had a '91 Camaro RS and loved it. Something about that body style that is cool.:thumbsup: |
1 Attachment(s)
It can go lower and live on the street. This was taken in the late 80's so forgive the styling. It was hot at the time.
|
I have to disagree on "level" and "stance" being two different things. A car can have a great stance and be perfectly level, not to be confused with raked or having a rake and I think your car looks right sitting level. I think a 1" drop front and rear and a 1 or 2" increase in wheel diameter would do wonders for your car making it look more modern and aggressive.
|
Thanks for the replies guys, much appreciated.
Quote:
|
hope this lps
after 5 mins... http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q...0008tttttt.jpg Lead. Lower...Just ask. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net