![]() |
D-SLR Camera's
I am in the market for a new D-SLR camera. I have done little homework and read up on a few brands and models. I have never had a D-SLR camera but I am leaning towards the Canon 60D, the Canon 2Ti, the Sony a33, and the Sony a55. I like the Sony camera's with their new Translucent Mirror Technology. This technology makes for faster focusing with non delay when taking multiple photos. They say the Sony video portion on the a33 & a55 has continues focus. Also, the stabilizer is inside the Sony camera rather than inside the lens. (Canon, Nikon, etc.)
Does anyone have the Canon 60D, Canon 2Ti, the Sony a33 or Sony a55? If so, may I have your pro's and con's on the camera? I plan on using the camera for general purposes (family photo's, family events, car shows, sporting events, etc.) and I would like to have the above average camera. Please commit on all others brands and models of camera's as well. Thanks. |
I cant comment directly on the t2i, but i do have an xsi that i have been shooting with for 3+ years. I love that camera. Im a huge Canon fan and have upgraded my lenses accordingly. shooting mainly with a 24-105 f4 L lens. The shots it comes up with are great. Not having had a d-slr before, whatever you buy there is going to be a learning curve. if you leave it on auto it will definitely come up with some decent stuff but the real fun comes when you start shooting in manual mode. you can really get creative with your shots once you learn. maybe pick up a digital photography for dummys book. good info in there. i have it and really have learned some good tips. also pic up the field guide for whatever camera you choose.
my only real advice, is i would stick with either canon or nikon...cant lose with either of them. having shot with both i know both fairly decently, though canon more so. i have never shot with a sony and have no real desire to. I dont think their lenses are as readily available as nikon and canon (i could be wrong here) and not sure about the quality of the glass of the lenses like say the L series from canon. |
hope this helps you out
http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/ubbt...gonew=1#UNREAD |
We had a non digital Canon and it was great! I bought the Wifey the T2i for xmas and it is a solid camera. Dont got for the T1i if you are interested in the video capabilities as it was a poor attempt at it. The T2i seems to have fixed the issues though. I went with the T2i cause it was borderline on the consumer/ pro photo, so still user friendly but with the quality to go with it. Keep in mind if you go with a higher end camera it is better/recommended to get a higher class sd memory card too especially if you use the video option.
|
Quote:
|
I have a Nikon D90 and LOVE it. :thumbsup:
|
Quote:
Is Sony new in the D-SLR market? |
Digital photography for dummys book would be a good thing for me. I have purchased a few magazines to read up on all the brands and models.
Thanks Speed. Scott, does your Nikon D90 have good video? |
Quote:
no matter what camera you choose, make sure youre comfortable with it. as long as it does what you want to do, youll be fine. Sony is not new to the D-slr market but i would say newer than say canon or nikon whom have been doing this forever haha. thats my only reason i dont reccommend sony being that they are newer to the game and im not sure about your options for it and glass quality on the lenses. |
I have the Nikon D5000 and I love it. Its my first DSLR and it can do amazing things! I looked at this camaera and the Canon T1i and went with the D5000 because of the articulating screen. It's pretty cool, you can position it anyway you like and take shots in many crazy positions easily!
|
Try this site, it's been very helpful and accurate for me in the last 8 years or so. http://www.steves-digicams.com/camera-reviews/
Canon is my personal preferance. I think a common trend is placing more emphasis on a body vs. the lens. A Rebel T2i with a good lens suited to your primary photo objectives is not a bad place to start. |
Quote:
Something is drawing me to the Sony but I still need to read more about the Sony's and the Canon's and their lenses. I may end up buying two camera's :willy: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you have the T2i? |
Quote:
W |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nikon vs Canon.............Ford vs Chevy :D Both are good options. |
Quote:
|
Sony.....
They make small radios I think.... and maybe some other trinkets. Nikon makes cameras. Cannon makes cameras. And my favorite camera quote of all time is still.... Steve Rupps Q: What's the best camera? A: "The one you have with you" So true in so many ways.... One thing you might want to consider is the lens format. Nikon and Cannon have bodies that take the same lens for many years - which means there is a market for them - (both the bodies and the lens) - and you can borrow and swap with friends etc. I was at an IRL race with a buddy that is a pro - It was super fun using all his super hi-zoot lenses on my camera! Of course, as many pros and knowledgable people do he uses Nikon... so we could swap (a one way swap - LOL). I bought both the kids Nikons for Xmas last year (they've reached the ages where they actually have lives)... and they've taken some amazing photos with them while just "experimenting" and learning. The beauty of this is that we can share the lens format between the three of us. |
|
i have a D60 Canon and it takes better pics than i can, i am taking a course to teach the operator how to use it.
the only thing i don't like that i didn't think wold be important is it doesnt do video. other than that it is a great |
Quote:
Thanks for the website. |
Quote:
Are we talking about the same camera? |
Quote:
I own a Canon 40D myself. I bought it for the same reasons 2 years ago. Lenses are high quality and abundant from Canon. It doesn't matter which Canon camera you upgrade to either in the future, all your lenses will work. (That's the point someone was making before) Your money should be primarily invested into the lenses is what I was told by numerous photographers. So don't worry about all the newest doo dad features on the camera itself. You won't know how to use 90% of them without taking a photography class and learning how to use them. All your editing is done with software these days. Put the money in high quality high quality aperture lenses. Canon are durable metal construction. Tamron and Sigma feel cheap. http://www.bobatkins.com/photography...os_lenses.html Shop Ebay or Amazon. The EF 28-135 IS Canon lens is my all around carry lens. (Recommended by photographer) I have an EF 70-300 IS lens as well. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/r...ns-review.aspx However, if you can afford the "L" series, that's what you really want. |
Quote:
So don't get me wrong here -- because the new autofocus stuff will fit on a old body - but, of course - it won't autofocus.... but it will attach to the body and you could manually focus and set f stops etc. What I was trying to point out is -- should you want to sell and upgrade your body at some time - if you have a mainstream camera brand such as a Nikon or a Canon - this is super easy and you don't have to change lenses and accessories etc. Trust me - if you like photography.... and it is just another disease... you WILL want to upgrade or change stuff around. Not having to buy new lenses (the most expensive part of the hobby is the lenses) is an extremely important "function". |
Quote:
Thanks for the sites. They have good information. |
Quote:
Changing bodies in the future is a good option but I can't catch the photography disease...cause the resto-mode disease is all I can take. If you have ever noticed, what brand of camera's have you seen people use? Is there any one reason why you bought your children Nikon's over Canon's? |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net