Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   EFI and Forced Induction (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   Carb to EFI hp gain? (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=44510)

DOOM 01-02-2014 09:47 AM

Carb to EFI hp gain?
 
Had a conversation with a friend over the holiday week. We talked about hp gains from Carb to EFI . I used my 620 horse 572 pump gas crate engine as an example. I say hp gains would be very small maybe 5 to 10 hp. He thinks more like 20 to 30 depending on what type of injection . I don't think so what do you guys think????

67ragtp 01-02-2014 12:20 PM

Im not buying 20 to 30 hp, a well set up carb vs efi should be pretty close at peak hp/torque. Its under the curve with an efi system that I believe 20 is obtainable, throttle response is the biggest eye opener for the carb to efi swap, of course cold start and cruise become more effecient as well.

Rich

DOOM 01-02-2014 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67ragtp (Post 526301)
Im not buying 20 to 30 hp, a well set up carb vs efi should be pretty close at peak hp/torque. Its under the curve with an efi system that I believe 20 is obtainable, throttle response is the biggest eye opener for the carb to efi swap, of course cold start and cruise become more effecient as well.

Rich

I'm with you Rich

Flash68 01-02-2014 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67ragtp (Post 526301)
Im not buying 20 to 30 hp, a well set up carb vs efi should be pretty close at peak hp/torque. Its under the curve with an efi system that I believe 20 is obtainable, throttle response is the biggest eye opener for the carb to efi swap, of course cold start and cruise become more effecient as well.

Rich

What he said.

hifi875 01-02-2014 12:51 PM

carb should make more power, especially on the top end. What I hear is that a carb atomizes fuel better than efi. efi should have more bottom end and be more responsive, but other than that shouldn't make more than a carb

supremeefi 01-02-2014 04:15 PM

As mentioned a carb should actually make a few more hp at peak than an EFI. But the trip there will normally be better with a well setup EFI system.

PTAddict 01-02-2014 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hifi875 (Post 526309)
... What I hear is that a carb atomizes fuel better than efi ...

Not quite true. EFI injects fuel at a much higher pressure differential than a carb, and thus achieves much finer atomization. What is true, though, is that the longer path from fuel introduction to intake valve on a carb setup provides slightly greater time for evaporative cooling, and thus possibly slightly higher charge density. But the overall point remains - with identically configured intake systems, carb and EFI will produce almost identical peak power within the margin of error.

Of course, one of the great advantages of EFI is that port injection allows much more flexibility in intake configuration, which can and does yield benefits in mid range performance in particular.

chr2002ca 01-08-2014 02:56 PM

Depends on the manifold. If you're just swapping out the carb for one of those EFI throttle bodies that has the injectors in it, you won't see too much difference other than cold starts, MPG improvement, and easier tuning. Switch to an MPFI setup with separate injectors for each intake runner in the manifold and you're going to see further improvement in throttle response also and MPG. It's not until you change the manifold to a tunnel style unit with the throttle body mounted on the front(like an Edekbrock Pro-Flo XT) will you see any noticeable increase in horsepower. So I agree with others. A straight carb-to-EFI swap using the same manifold will not make much difference in horsepower, with the slight edge on peak HP going to the carb. Several magazines have proved that already also. I just recently spent some $K's to swap from carb to an MPFI setup and I could care less about extra HP because this EFI stuff is the bomb. Well worth it once you get all the sh_t plumbed and wired.

supremeefi 01-08-2014 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chr2002ca (Post 527695)
Depends on the manifold. If you're just swapping out the carb for one of those EFI throttle bodies that has the injectors in it, you won't see too much difference other than cold starts, MPG improvement, and easier tuning. Switch to an MPFI setup with separate injectors for each intake runner in the manifold and you're going to see further improvement in throttle response also and MPG. It's not until you change the manifold to a tunnel style unit with the throttle body mounted on the front(like an Edekbrock Pro-Flo XT) will you see any noticeable increase in horsepower. So I agree with others. A straight carb-to-EFI swap using the same manifold will not make much difference in horsepower, with the slight edge on peak HP going to the carb. Several magazines have proved that already also. I just recently spent some $K's to swap from carb to an MPFI setup and I could care less about extra HP because this EFI stuff is the bomb. Well worth it once you get all the sh_t plumbed and wired.

Otherwise your info is correct but that statement isn't.
Pro Flo XT's etc aren't for every application. If the rest of your combo isn't well mated to the power band that intake will provide you may actually lose hp/tq.
I've seen measurable gains on mild builds by doing multiport EFI on dual planes, have one on my car. I started out with an EFI'd single plane intake, went to a dual plane modified for EFI and the difference was night and day, from idle to wot. The added runner length and/or smaller plenum area proved beneficial, the exact opposite of the Pro Flo/Mini Ram type stuff.

GregWeld 01-08-2014 04:04 PM

I don't think people are doing EFI for hp/tq gains --- I think people are choosing it for drivability.

chr2002ca 01-08-2014 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by supremeefi (Post 527699)
Otherwise your info is correct but that statement isn't.
Pro Flo XT's etc aren't for every application. If the rest of your combo isn't well mated to the power band that intake will provide you may actually lose hp/tq.
I've seen measurable gains on mild builds by doing multiport EFI on dual planes, have one on my car. I started out with an EFI'd single plane intake, went to a dual plane modified for EFI and the difference was night and day, from idle to wot. The added runner length and/or smaller plenum area proved beneficial, the exact opposite of the Pro Flo/Mini Ram type stuff.

Opinions and results vary. All depends on your setup, as you mentioned. I should've mentioned that. :)

Revved 01-20-2014 10:51 PM

WOT total HP on an identical engine with a perfectly tuned carb will be essentially the same as it would be on EFI. You have to remember that tuning for WOT or your "BIG NUMBER" is the easiest thing to tune for. How many cars have you seen that run great at WOT but are horrible to drive around town? Greg mentioned half the story- that EFI is going to give you better all around drivability but taking that point further is that EFI is going to give you better fuel control throughout the range most likely broadening your USABLE horsepower and torque. By properly controlling fuel flow throughout the entire range you are also gaining fuel economy, managing proper engine temperature,cutting down on unnecessary engine wear due to over or under fueling, and saving you money.

Stating it simply carburation has three main modes. Idle, part throttle, wide open. Everything in between is a fudge of those three. When we tune carbureted vehicles we use a FAST dual wide band 02 meter and can dial them in pretty damn well and get huge drivability gains over a vehicle "tuned by ear." Typically it takes us about 8 hours on a blown big block carb application of driving, tear down, drilling, jetting, driving, tear down, adjusting timing curves, etc.. again and again until what we are seeing coming out of the engine is "dialed in." When done.. the drivability is huge, torque curve is huge... I'm convinced that if you have to run a carb using a dual 02 meter is the best way to accurately tune it. (yes- EGTs as well but how many street cars are driving around with a bung in each of their primaries!)

I can do the same thing with a sequential EFI blown big block in about 2-4 hours tapping away on a laptop. Is there more time getting to that point...yes. I'm OCD... I tailor my wiring harnesses to fit the vehicle... even if they come prefab..I cut them apart and tailor them. Typically I put about 25 hours into wiring an EFI system...I build electronics panels to mount all of the fuses and relays, I put connectors anywhere the harness touches another harness. But when I'm done it looks like it was born there.

I would disagree on carb atomizing fuel better... With a port injection setup you have 8 high pressure pin point applications of fuel instead of 4 big holes sucking low pressure fuel through four straws. EFI gives accuracy and efficiency again and is less succeptable to ambient temp changes (ie. fuel dribbling down the intake walls from your carb)

my .02

mnm99 01-21-2014 03:49 AM

I'm doing EFI soon too. Just better all around. Temp changes, Cold starts, Off throttle response, gas mileage ect...

Ron Sutton 01-21-2014 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revved (Post 530465)
WOT total HP on an identical engine with a perfectly tuned carb will be essentially the same as it would be on EFI. You have to remember that tuning for WOT or your "BIG NUMBER" is the easiest thing to tune for. How many cars have you seen that run great at WOT but are horrible to drive around town? Greg mentioned half the story- that EFI is going to give you better all around drivability but taking that point further is that EFI is going to give you better fuel control throughout the range most likely broadening your USABLE horsepower and torque. By properly controlling fuel flow throughout the entire range you are also gaining fuel economy, managing proper engine temperature,cutting down on unnecessary engine wear due to over or under fueling, and saving you money.

Stating it simply carburation has three main modes. Idle, part throttle, wide open. Everything in between is a fudge of those three. When we tune carbureted vehicles we use a FAST dual wide band 02 meter and can dial them in pretty damn well and get huge drivability gains over a vehicle "tuned by ear." Typically it takes us about 8 hours on a blown big block carb application of driving, tear down, drilling, jetting, driving, tear down, adjusting timing curves, etc.. again and again until what we are seeing coming out of the engine is "dialed in." When done.. the drivability is huge, torque curve is huge... I'm convinced that if you have to run a carb using a dual 02 meter is the best way to accurately tune it. (yes- EGTs as well but how many street cars are driving around with a bung in each of their primaries!)

I can do the same thing with a sequential EFI blown big block in about 2-4 hours tapping away on a laptop. Is there more time getting to that point...yes. I'm OCD... I tailor my wiring harnesses to fit the vehicle... even if they come prefab..I cut them apart and tailor them. Typically I put about 25 hours into wiring an EFI system...I build electronics panels to mount all of the fuses and relays, I put connectors anywhere the harness touches another harness. But when I'm done it looks like it was born there.

I would disagree on carb atomizing fuel better... With a port injection setup you have 8 high pressure pin point applications of fuel instead of 4 big holes sucking low pressure fuel through four straws. EFI gives accuracy and efficiency again and is less succeptable to ambient temp changes (ie. fuel dribbling down the intake walls from your carb)

my .02

Agreed x2

The T-man 04-04-2014 04:53 PM

20hp (or more) w/ thorough tuning is easily possible

StarlinerJack 05-31-2017 02:59 PM

I've experienced this first hand. I wouldnt expect a MPG increase but if you get it thats always a good thing :)

StarlinerJack 05-31-2017 03:02 PM

Boy i just realized how old this thread is. :EmoteClueless:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net