![]() |
Roots/Twin screw heat soak?
Hello all,
I'm looking for some opinions from people who have raced with a roots(magnacharger) or twin screw (kb or whipple) superchargers. How fast did heat soak set in? |
Hopefully, you'll get some more responses but also be sure to check out the build threads on Mayhem and Camaro XV aka Hellion. Mark and some of the other guys got very technical with the engine details and specifically cooling the engine. You might find some good info there.
|
I pay attention to all of marks post. He's a brilliant engineer. Ive seen all of his cars at optima... None of them appeared to drop off too bad due to heat soak...but his last 2 motors were build by Brian Thompson. To the best of my knowledge, Brian is one hell of a builder/tuner.
|
Quote:
Are you trying to buy a supercharger but not going to depending on the time it takes for it to set in? Maybe there is a reason behind you specific question it but I think you want to know what is more efficient? You may already know this but twin screws are superior for many reason in my opinion. It's a true compressor and by design, has a higher adiabatic efficiency. I don't believe even a tri lobe roots design are close to the efficiency on many levels as a twinscrew. There's also water meth to keep charge temps cooler especially when spraying into the twin screw (never tried it on a roots)...it really seals the "gap" between the screws and lowers the compressed air pre discharge. |
Simple. Real world experience. Mark runs a LS9 blower on his 427. A few years ago, a guy with a 99 magnacharged vette was ripping off impressive times at Optima. Everyone says twin screws are more efficient, but ....yeah never know. Again, looking for real world experience.
|
Quote:
|
Good points but it is a big chunk of aluminium on the top of the engine. Keeping under hood temp as low as possible is something to keep in mind.
|
Heat soak happens, IMHO, on any blower motor. I agree w Carmello above that twin screws are more efficient. KB advertises a 10 degree intake charge increase with their intercooler system, but you can always go bigger and less efficient and engineer more cooling into the system.
Temps and humidity on the specific day, how long your track sessions last (Optima at Spring Mountain is what, four laps / 2.5 miles a lap?) all factor into the equation. What's the intended use? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
How quickly it heat soaks has a lot to due with how much water is being flowed through the intercooler and how hard you're spinning the blower. We've been testing this on a dyno and have found some blowers will heat soak in 3 pulls on the dyno because the intercoolers are so restrictive to water flow. I can tell you a 4.0L whipple intercooler can be modified to flow 20 gpm.
|
Quote:
|
:trophy-1302:
Quote:
Makes me wonder why blower mfgs wont make them flow enough at first place? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net