![]() |
What a whiner...707hp Dodge Challenger
...making some very appropriate noises. :thumbsup:
|
Sweet looking. I like the wheels. Dodge is saying that's the fastest muscle car of all time. Hope it goes more than 201 then. Something tells me it won't.
|
when are they going to get rid of those 70 series tires! all that HP it needs fatty's
|
Quote:
Real forced cold air through driver side halo light. Pretty sweet car. I am thinking it's more than the "announced 707 HP and 650 TQ at the crank. Quote:
And also the only muscle car to have that much HP. He is correct on the latter and I am sure that they have tested against other cars, like the GT500 in the quarter mile. Don't quote me, but I think this car runs in the mid 10's in STOCK form. (Again,...don't quote me on that. You know how rumors get started on the interwebs. lol) We'll know more in a couple of weeks. Quote:
That would be one of my first mods, is to run the fattest tire possible and safely. |
Quote:
|
When you say fastest, that means you have outrun the Shelby. If he said quickest through the quarter and lovely smoke shows, then yeah I'd bite. Don't get me wrong, I like it more than the Shelby and the ZL1, but claims are claims. It's got a ton of snot, so it might do it.
|
In very hot temps and at high elevation, this stock Shelby GT500 did 196mph with Pobst driving. He said it's a 200mph car.
The Challenger seems to be a fair amount heavier than the Shelby...certainly it's a bigger car obviously. We will see. :) |
Quote:
LOL |
Quote:
Yer doin a Weld imitation now Vince?! :tv_happy: |
Quote:
|
FWIW the base Challenger (w/o the Turbo and intercooler systems) is 4,082lbs.
|
1 Attachment(s)
So Vince, 5 years later is Dodge any closer to getting the your coveted...
:D |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
ahhh no Fiat does not. :twak:
LOL....its going to take a bunch to win me back. Its a deep seeded burn on what developed during 09-10. I refused to sell out. The new Cuda looks promising. |
Quote:
For a guy that bleeds Ford 'green', you sure know alot about that porky Challenger. :thankyou: Quote:
:tiptoe: lol |
has anyone seen a price yet? you know, before the 15k dealer premium:twak:
|
Quote:
|
Dodge products always stuck great motors in cars that couldn't turn left or right... so for me -- it's like who cares. On a twisty road - the base Corvette would probably run away from it.
I had an SRT 8 -- hated it. The 425HP sounded good at the time - it was such a ho hum vehicle that it just sat in the driveway. What bugged me almost as much as the lame ass motor - was their plastic everything. The "hand" of the controls was so yesterday... especially if you got out of it and then took a ride in my sons Audi S4.... similar costs and the Audi was just so much more car. The SRT ranked right there with my BMW M5 -- both ranked as two of the most disliked cars I've ever owned --- and I've owned a lot of cars. |
1 Attachment(s)
From...
@automobilemag: How fast is the 707-hp #Dodge Challenger #Hellcat? Try 11.2 sec at 125 mph -- on street tires! http://t.co/fS23QreIIa http://t.co/c0WdVKnKmS "We already knew the 2015 Dodge Challenger Hellcat packed a 707-hp punch from its supercharged 6.2-liter V-8 engine, but now we know just how quickly the muscle car will hustle down a quarter-mile track. According to Dodge's own testing, the Hellcat runs the quarter mile in 11.2 seconds at 125 mph. When fitted with drag radials instead of its standard Pirelli P Zero street tires, the Hellcat managed a 10.8-second run at 126 mph. "It wasn't long ago that a 10-second car, was a full-on race car," Dodge and SRT president Tim Kuniskis said in a statement. "Not only can Challenger run 10s on the drag strip, but you can also fit your family and drive cross country." Read more: http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...#ixzz37ApBVwoh |
1 Attachment(s)
It finally got an interior upgrade...we'll see how much of an improvement it is after Vince reports back.
:hello: lol |
I like the throw back slap stick and driver only console.
|
I don't see what all the negativity is about the Challenger. I don't have the luxury of owning any of the new Pony cars, but I have drove them. The Challenger SRT was the most practical of the 3. The Camaro SS has the potential to be a fun car, but visibility sucks, big time. The Mustang GT felt cheap and like it had no guts whatsoever.
I might be biased, but I could live with an elephant that can throw it's own weight around instead of a car you'd have to drive blind or a horse that just trips all over itself. Lets not forget, the Challenger can haul more than just one passenger and be comfortable. You might as well forget it when it comes to the other two. Their backseats are a joke. |
Quote:
The Big 3 have really shot themselves for years cheaping out on interiors. I read the C7 Vettes' is much, much better than past efforts. Supposedly the 2015 Mustangs' and Challengers' are much better too. Time will tell. |
Quote:
It is still a heavy car and it would get beat going through the twisty roads. But, I don't think that the people at SRT had that fact in mind. Plus,...it's still a heavy car. They were going for all drag strip car. They won those bragging rights. For now. :stirthepot: That being said, I think the ECM will "locked" as well. Which means it may be a bit difficult to add a smaller pulley, a CAI and a 93 tune. I'm sure it won't take long before the "code" is broken. lol :goggles: |
Quote:
Dodge makes plenty of money on them. They could have spent some on giving their customers a high quality interior. That doesn't just come from me, it's a common complaint from owners. Hopefully they did for 2015. I was interested in it because it is a bigger (and more comfortable car IMO) than the Stang and Camaro. Plus it looks great to me. Quote:
:thankyou: |
Kinda funny,
Seems like the same conversation that might have taken place in 1970. The big powerful Mopar and the nimble ponies...... |
Quote:
My thought exactly. Nothing has changed in all these years. Mopar puts out a motor but the car it's in is not worthy. Meanwhile Ford and Chevy duke it out. |
Quote:
The past LX platform was old and outdated circa 1998? It was ok but could use some help. I believe the new model is on the LA platform and im told is superior. We will see. The multi link rear is well done. I very happy that we still have rear wheel drive cars. __________________ |
It surprised me to learn that Dodge was never looking to sell anywhere near as many Challengers as Ford does Mustangs and Chevy does Camaros.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "A Month to Wait for the Hellcat While those folks looking to buy a 2015 Dodge Challenger SXT, R/T Scat Pack or SRT392 can place their orders right now, the buyers who want the 707 horsepower will have to wait until August 8th. Production is reported to begin on September 2nd so the first Hellcat Challengers almost surely be hitting the roads before Halloween." - See more at: http://www.torquenews.com/106/order-....cnNBd17L.dpuf |
@automobilemag: 707 hp, 11.2 sec. 1/4 mile...now add one more Challenger Hellcat number to the list: $60,990
http://t.co/IDF8YJ4Vro http://t.co/VklX6HAj95 |
Quote:
|
I've never been a huge fan of Dodge cars but the Challengers look like what a muscle car should look like. In fact, I'd go as far as saying that the new Camaros should've looked more like the Challengers and I'm a Chevy guy for the most part. Now, with the upgraded interior my second to last hangup has been taken care of. I'd get a Challenger over a Mustang or Camaro, IF I had the money to buy a new car in that range (price is my last hangup :drowninga: ).
In the mean time, I'll concentrate on making my '69 nicer. I've got less than half the price of that new Challenger in it and it's already pretty nice. Plus, it won't depreciate like new cars do. In any case, Dodge is hitting a homerun with this thing for that type of money. $60,990 is just a little more than a base model vette and I think that's a heck of a deal for what it is. I'd love to have one, and if I had that kind of money to spend and the inclination to do so, I'd buy it over the Camaro or Mustang for sure. I'd have a hard time deciding between the Challenger and the Vette though. The new Vettes are pretty darn mean looking! |
Quote:
Quote:
This car's top speed is 199 MPH. This car's 0-60 time is the same as the 2015 Corvette Z06. (3.5 seconds) Nice stuff indeed. :thumbsup: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I thought you guys would like this one.
:tv_happy: |
Thanks for posting Tones. :thumbsup:
That bigg car does badd things. :drive: |
not too bad for a 5000 lbs car on stock wheels and tires.
|
Quote:
And just a real nice number to look at too...'707'. :wow: |
Cool video of it on the track. Looks like it even has the rev matching on downshifts option...
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net