![]() |
hoping our Protouring cars don't date like this
|
$3,850 and it hasn't met reserve yet?:confused59:
|
Jesus .....what an abortion
|
Not gonna lie, I checked it out to consider saving it.
|
May be a good start to a project as its most likely scaring away some folks!
|
This is what happens when you pursue style over function, even if your function is only an autocross. While style is arguable, function is not. Re-think that tramp stamp.
:badidea: |
Quote:
|
2 things...
1) I don't think that was cool even in the time period it was built. 2) Nothing that a good builder/fab guy cannot correct with new quarters, front clip, etc. |
I don't even know what to say about it...
|
I'm sorry, that's just a ugly car to me. I know each to his own, but...
I agree though for the price (so far) it would be a good place to start to restore the '69 though. |
there was Nothing ever Cool about that!
|
It would sell, in the right location.
|
That's what Stielow envisioned the Mule should look like.
|
Quote:
Look at "inferno" by Roadster shop. It was a magazine car before they got it and when they took all the pretty red paint off it was a mess underneath. Then they cut it all up anyways. |
Damn!
|
Quote:
Well we all missed it @ $6,700 . No sale 😬😬 |
beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.
|
Who all would consider $6700 a deal on this? Factor in you'll possibly need another $5000 in sheet metal to correctly put it back together and make it look like a 69 again. Then probably another $5000 in labor getting everything installed and welded in correctly. So, now we have an almost $17000 car. Not a pro-tourer that's been restored, but I'm sure you could find a decent factory 69 for that price without all of the hassle for nearly that price. What's y'all's opinions on this analogy?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net