![]() |
Pro Touring performance
I was wondering how the Pro touring cars stack up with the new age muscle cars like the new Camaro, base Vett, Mustang 5.0 , Shelby Gt 500, and the SRT Dodge products?
I ask this because the above are staring to be pretty good cars and really start to perform with some simple mods. I know the PT cars are about older cars running like the new ones but does anybody have both and how does the handling, braking and straight line performace compare? Thanks TJ |
keep your eyes on the Optima Challenge that should answer your ?
|
Here's were there is no comparison:
Cost to build a 69 Camaro (as example) to compete at the level of a new factory Camaro. :unibrow: The new one gets no thumbs up or horns from truckers on the freeway - garners no "wows" from complete strangers and never causes a impromptu car show while getting a tank of gas. At OUSCI 2009 there was a couple brand new modified Mustangs and a few brand new highly modified Camaros. Some were not entered other than for exhibition so not all times are posted. The link here is to the RESULTS of the 2009 OUSCI. This is a competition that includes AutoX - road track - 0-60-0 Check the results out yourself. Note the times and distances of the 2010 Camaro versus some of the PT cars you ask about. http://www.optimainvitational.com/media/results.pdf |
They stack up well.
Our 65 Pontiac Tempest won the overall autocross competition on Hot Rod Power Tour in 2010, beating 168 cars including ZO6 vettes, Porsches, Ford GT, Shelby GT500, RX8, 350Z, etc, etc. It has run 12.36 in the 1/4 mile. At Car Craft 2009 it beat AUdi R8, a couple Vipers, Z06 etc, it wasnt the overall fastest, but was in the hunt. We recorded 1.08 with Chris Jacobs 66 Chevelle, when Randy owned it. Our Vega is a low budget car that finished 3rd in the AX at Holley LS fest, and 2nd at Car Craft RSE beating a number of late model cars. That has run 11.98 and I hope to hit 10's on spray. The cost to build an old car to current car performance levels is probably more than buying the new car in most cases. However, anyone can go out and sign on the dotted line for a new car. |
Performance
Cool, Cool Cool. Guys you rock. I knew someone could give me some numbers and examples.
Just confirms why Pro touring is so popular and why I want a PT car over my 2008 Saleen. Thanks TJ |
I wouldn't mind doing a newer Challenger all pro-tour. With that being said, there's no "WOW" factor like driving an old school muscle car with the pro-tour flavor. It can handle like all heck and have the old school looks.:thumbsup:
|
When I first asked myself this same question, I set my goals at being "only" just as good as a late model car but after more thought about it, I want to be just as good as a MODIFIED late model street car. It might take awhile to get there but that's where my sites are set.
|
Super Chevy magazine ran an article in the Dec.2009 issue about the Nitto Tire Suspension and Handling Challenge. The challenge compared Pro-touring/G-machines to the stats of a 2010 Chevy Camaro. I believe they did it again this year, but I don't think the article has ran yet.
|
|
Here is an interesting vid, and the Challenger Hotchkis built is representative of many of the builds on here, and is a little light in the hp dept if anything.
http://www.insideline.com/dodge/chal...hallenger.html |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net