![]() |
Carb rec
I have a 550HP 468 with an aggressive cam and 13:1 pistons. Stock heads knock it down a little. I was running a 1050 dominator, but too much (too rich) for daily street driving. Was awesome when opened up.
I'm looking for a carb rec for my application. Not going to be track driven, but I have wide open roads all over the place. I was thinking 850 with vacuum secondaries. Please chime in with ideas. I don't want to smell like raw fuel anymore while driving the car. Thanks, |
Bear ===
There is MATH for that: Take your CUBIC INCHES X's MAX RPM divide by 3456 X's the V/E of .85 So in your case 468 X's 6000 = 2,808,000 2,808,000 div by 3456 = 812.5 812.5 X's .85 = 690 CFM That is making some assumptions - such as max rpm - and using a relatively conservative assumption of engine volumetric efficiency (85%) I'd probably be running an 850 CFM and mess with the jetting til it was right. Math works out to an 800 CFM if you raise the RPMS to 6500 and use .90 for VE.... Too big is worse than slightly small IMHO. Higher airflow will help your idle - and throttle response and you won't notice the 10 HP at the top end you might lose. My bet is that with the right carb - your torque would jump up and your car will be and feel far faster.:cheers: |
If your engine is set up correctly now, it won't respond well to your plans. Your trying to make a one trick pony that likes to run take a walk in a jail cell. I'd change the cam, pistons, intake, carb, converter, etc.
|
Pro Systems
FWIW My 440cid Pontiac made:
601hp/551tq with a 1050 Dominator 590hp/550tq with a 950HP and a 1" spacer 576hp/541tq with a PRO Systems 820 cfm 4150 carb and no spacer FTW! :thumbsup: HTH V/R, Ty |
Quote:
What I can't figure out is the 13:1 comp ratio and "street" driving... :unibrow: |
Quote:
|
oh btw. Went with quick fuel 850. Badass set up now.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net