Matt@BOS |
07-06-2011 10:43 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ's69
(Post 358221)
So, does that mean Bad Penny isn't comparable with RED Devil? Just wondering, Penny has to be over $100k if someone was to reproduce/clone it?
Also, haven't heard much about Penny in awhile? Anybody know if Rupp is still thrashing her around at any autocrosses?
|
When I saw the Red Devil at SEMA and had the opportunity to talk with Mark for a few minutes, it became apparent just how well thought out and carefully engineered the car is, and I'm not just talking about the ABS, it is the whole package that Red Devil brings. It just looks functional, comfortable, shiny, and fast. It feels so OEM compared to most of our cars. Dave is right, when you start factoring in all of the attention to detail, that car can make any number of 100k cars look, well... insignificant. That is not to say you can't compare it to Bad Penny. Several of us San Diego guys went up to Barrett Jackson OC, with Steve and got to play the part of Bad Penny's groupies. Penny was easily one of the 10 nicest cars at the event with regard to paint, engineering, etc. Unlike the Red Devil, Penny has a decidedly more obvious race car inspiration. In the end, I think comparisons between two are inevitable. They are perhaps the two most iconic cars in our community right now. Both are ridiculously fast, and have been painstakingly dialed in to perform on the track. Both can cruise down the highway comfortably, and pick up an award at a local show for "best paint."
Lastly, 250K might sound insane, but if you paid a shop to build you a car just like Red Devil, and had to pay for everything ranging from the big ticket items like the LS7/9 to the small things like the fluid coolers, and then paid for the time involved in dialing in the shocks, springs, tires, etc. then 250k isn't a stretch. Besides there are a lot of pro builds that cost more than we can believe. the Devil is in the details, so to speak.
Matt
|