Lateral-g Forums

Lateral-g Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/index.php)
-   Off Topic Forums (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Safety aspects of our hobby... (https://www.lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php?t=40515)

RussMurco 03-04-2013 12:04 PM

Safety aspects of our hobby...
 
I just saw a sad picture from the Power Tour in 2010, one of the participants had a head-on collision in his 69 Camaro which killed him and severely injured his 14 y/o son. The car looked mostly stock, the passenger compartment held up fairly well, but the impact was enough to crush the front and transfered enough energy to bend the rear quarter and, of course, kill the driver.
We typically drive older cars created before energy disapation was really built into the cars, I've been in a 50 mph head-on collision in a 1966 Mustang and my knee is still a problem after 30 years, so what can we do to make them safer beyond putting padded dash panels and 3-point belts in?
This picture also got me wondering about these performance sub-frames we put on our cars don't seem to have any "crumple-zones" and are often just straight-up rectangular tubing. Add down-bars and, in my mind, there is less chance of the frame absorbing the impact thereby transferring that energy to the occupants. I know NASCARS have had similar frames from 40+ years but we aren't trying to absorb 100+ mph wall impacts. Has anyone looked at making the structures safer for passenger protection?

BonzoHansen 03-04-2013 01:57 PM

I don't know what you can do. I know I will not drive one that does not have 3 points.

Vince@Meanstreets 03-06-2013 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ravenworks (Post 468469)
I just saw a sad picture from the Power Tour in 2010, one of the participants had a head-on collision in his 69 Camaro which killed him and severely injured his 14 y/o son. The car looked mostly stock, the passenger compartment held up fairly well, but the impact was enough to crush the front and transfered enough energy to bend the rear quarter and, of course, kill the driver.
We typically drive older cars created before energy disapation was really built into the cars, I've been in a 50 mph head-on collision in a 1966 Mustang and my knee is still a problem after 30 years, so what can we do to make them safer beyond putting padded dash panels and 3-point belts in?
This picture also got me wondering about these performance sub-frames we put on our cars don't seem to have any "crumple-zones" and are often just straight-up rectangular tubing. Add down-bars and, in my mind, there is less chance of the frame absorbing the impact thereby transferring that energy to the occupants. I know NASCARS have had similar frames from 40+ years but we aren't trying to absorb 100+ mph wall impacts. Has anyone looked at making the structures safer for passenger protection?

Liability....Look at all the products that we use. Most have a " Not for highway use" or "for off road use only" lable.

If a manufacture created a product to keep people alive and it failed to do so. Bye bye manufacturer.

RussMurco 03-07-2013 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab (Post 469098)
Liability....Look at all the products that we use. Most have a " Not for highway use" or "for off road use only" lable.

If a manufacture created a product to keep people alive and it failed to do so. Bye bye manufacturer.

Oh, I know about the legal aspects, trust me.
Maybe it's just my age kicking in...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net