![]() |
Help? Chevelle and Nova Experts?
Greetings all,
New guy here needs help choosing a project car. Just got back from the Pomona auto swap meet looking for a project car. The parking lot had thinned out by the time I got there so the cars were spread apart and I couldn't compare the sizes of different years Novas and Chevelles. I'm looking to start a g-Machine daily driver project. I have a small garage so I'm liking the early 62-67 Novas (and they have all the benefits of a lighter car). Problem is I can't find a chassis solution to get great handling and large meats (particularly in the front) at a decent price. Then there is the '65 Chevelle. I like it a lot and it has many suspension bolt-ons that'll yield the handling and braking I want--but it's heavy and I'm not sure it'll fit in my garage. My questions are: 1. How do the 65-69 Chevelle body sizes and weights compare? That is to say, which is the smallest and/or lightest? Which is the largest and/or heaviest? Can anyone give me bumper-to-bumper measurements? 2. Is anyone aware of a 62-67 Nova front clip solution that can take large meats and handle like a monster. I need to keep up with todays high-performance vehicles so I want at least .95 G's (the front clips I've seen claim only a 16x7 wheel will fit and it pulled .86 G's) You may ask what my total budget is...I'd like to keep it around 30K. Thanks, Dave |
I thought you had already decided on the Chevy II?
|
They are both great cars to start a project with. The nova is going to be quite a bit lighter, but the chevelle has way better factory rear suspension. 68-72 nova's are a fairly easy car to get to handle good because the front sub frame is identical to a first generation Camaro sub frame. All the aftermarket subframes, suspension parts, stearing parts for a camaro will work with a 68-72 Nova. I would have gone to Pomona if I knew it was today. Oh well next time.
|
well i'm no where near an expert nor am i well spoken but i can tell you one thing, it's a hot day in socal today and it's mai-tai time.
oh and even though it's not really considered a pro-touring front clip my chasissi works front clip is night and day over the stock clip that came on my 67 nvawgn and i'm able to run 275-40-17's on the front. i'm in the midst of pulling together my plan for either an art morison rear tri 4-bar clip or chris alston just came out with their own triangulated 4-bar clip as well. why did i choose the tri-4-bar over the truck arm, i have no reason i just did. it's funny but my nova wagon was so much fun to drive even with the leaf spring rear suspension, i know i'm going to be so happy when i get rear finished, oh and i'm going to tri and stuff some 19x9's in the front and 19x12's in the rear. i have some colors picked out but that will be aways away. oh and the wagon with a 1/4 tank of fuel came in at 3000lbs no driver |
Quote:
I think for my purposes I'd prefer the Nova--if I can get it to handle. I know I can get the Chevelle to handle. But my research hasn't yielded the best results on Nova G Machine info. I've used the web, I've used books...everything is very much geared toward F bodies, then A bodies...X bodies are pulling up the rear. |
Quote:
It was hotter than Hades today anyway. |
Quote:
Thanks! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
well you could always drive up to sb and come for a spin, i just have to get it runnin again, i 'm having an electricle gremlin
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net