![]() |
Hogan intake for my LS2
Need some opinions on this intake VS a FAST intake setup.
Ayone pictures of one ontop of an LS2 would be great too. If this was a blower setup it would be a no brainer. Thanks, Rich |
Quote:
http://www.camcojb.com/malitude%20078.jpg Jody |
It don't get any better.:thumbsup:
|
pure sex right there!!! :unibrow:
|
It dont get any more expensive.
I have never heard anything bad about the FAST Stuff Jeff |
Quote:
|
Yesterday I took my engine to Ben Watsons race shop. They were trying to talk me into running a Hogan intake. They had five Hogans and three or more HRE's in the stock room (none of which would fit my motor).
After spending an hour in a NHRA pro stock drivers shop you start thinking all kinds of stupid expensive thoughts. I might decide to go this route if I could find someone that could tune the car for me. I live in SF Bay Area and will flat bed the car to somewhere close. Any more thought or ideas would be greatly appreciated. Rich |
If this is going on a stock cubed LS2, fast will be hard to beat. The sheetmetal looks killer but driveablity will suffer greatly. That manifold begs for as many rpm as you can throw at it.
A really good compromise is a Wilson Billett. Stays even with a fast at lower rpms and pulls away up top. Looks pretty sweet also.. Just my $.02 Good luck!! |
Hogan Sheet Metal Intake
2 Attachment(s)
On a BBC
|
Quote:
The sheet metal intakes are often compromised by not having sufficient hood room to allow long enough runners for a street engine. The result is better power at very high RPM - say, 6500 and up - but serious damage to the midrange torque bump that makes these motors feel bigger than their cubes. But the Hogan sure looks nice, and will very likely work better in forced induction applications than the LS6 or FAST intakes. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net