View Single Post
  #18  
Old 09-25-2007, 12:41 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

[quote=Silver69Camaro]I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. Our subframe has a 1/2" wider hub track than stock and does not require a flat-faced wheel, but keeps scrub in the optimum range.

quote]

Agree, It's really not a huge difference:

Stock Track Width = 60"
AM Sub = 60.5
DSE Sub = 58.5

So, the AM is 2" wider hub-to-hub, or, an inch of track width per side as compared to the DSE sub.

An extra inch of backspacing isn't a HUGE deal, I'll admit, but, it does change the look of the wheel, especially if you are getting up toward the maximum rim width possible...How much that aesthetic matters to any one person is of course just a personal preference.
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote