Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JamesJ
I dont think that you could have a 100% repeatable test
|
I agree. When you do engine challenges, the dynos and the "atmosphere" is more or less constant (temps in a dyno room change and frankly STP calcs have a bit of bogus to them). but that said, you have just a couple of dynos running in the same building and in theory can sorta control the environment.
If you have 50 different "mules", that is a problem. The only way to do it with some sort of repeatability would be to have a couple mule cars, both weighing the same with exactly similar chassis weight distributions (not wheel dist as that could vary with susp and adjustability, I am saying exactly or near exactly the same weight and cg location). Then you have to be able to quickly swap out suspension packages into that mule car and have "the Stig" drive every one thru the same course, etc with the same tires (new each time) etc. Way too hard to have repeatability for true comparisons.
Cool idea tho' on the surface and would be great if there were a way to do it... and I do love the engine masters challenge. I am absolutely blown away (having been a race engine builder for a few years) by the HP per cube they are getting on pump gas at 6500rpm! Staggering - I was reading the last challenge, which I thought was the coolest so far is it was a free-for-all on engine parameters with only essentially a HP/torque per cube calc. Bad ass and the best concept yet as bore v. stroke v. rod length etc were varying like crazy. The top guys... just staggering. But that is a LOT of dyno time on a particular combo, trust me. I knew a couple of the entrants over the years and 100 dyno runs getting a good combo (not winning BTW) is not "crazy talk".