View Single Post
  #5  
Old 01-08-2009, 06:41 PM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 88 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantera EFI View Post
We will "bench test" test a Procharger P-1SC-1 on a stock L-92 for a magazine.

This engine has the GM VVT adjustment.

The ECU-882C-2-H-TTL will allow for cam adjustment in
"closed loop"

My results, for the interested, will show the benefits of the VVT.

I will try to post the correct cam angles.

Lance
Bitchin'. There is no doubt there is a lot of power to be made by moving the cam around compared to a standard fixed cam timing setup.

I'm very interested in the long term durability and reliability of the stock GM cam phaser when paired with a wild cam, higher spring pressures, and higher cylinder pressures of forced induction applications... eventually someone is going to find out just how much "safety margin" GM built into it.

I'd love to run VVT on my TT LS2 but I don't want to be the one to find the breaking point and limitations of the stock phaser!
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.

Last edited by Blown353; 01-08-2009 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote