View Single Post
  #33  
Old 03-03-2009, 06:52 PM
Speedster's Avatar
Speedster Speedster is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 983
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOOM View Post
Man its just like looking in a mirror ARE YOU KIDDING ME! Once again the GENERAL drops the ball. A Mustang looks like a 60's and 70's Mustang ,the Challenger, well looks like a 70 Challenger. The minute they released the Challenger someone should of sent the design team back to the drawing board ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How can anyone look at these pictures and say these cars even closely resemble a 67,68 or a 69 Camaro. Am I mistaken is this not what GM was going for? Man something got lost in translation here... Sorry guys this is just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions
That's why they are opinions, and yours is respected.
The General didn't do too bad though, there are over 11,000 pre-orders. They can't even fill them for this year's pre-September model run, so they didn't do too bad.

The one thing nobody can refute is that we have muscle car wars again between GM, Ford and Chrysler. Camaro vs Mustang vs Challenger. 400+ hp available from the factory. It would be great if they started up a Trans Am series with these again. Also, there are drag versions of each available - sure beats a ricer... Opinion only.
__________________
-Bruce
Project "Freebird"
Dyno Video
http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/...lownbbchigh.wmv
Project Rides:
1968 Firebird - Blown 540
1987 Blazer 4x4 - Blown 355
2007 Magnum
2010 Camaro SS - LSX Twin Turbo
Reply With Quote