Agree
No I agree, with both paragraphs. I've heard little bad stuff about the pontiac 350 and what bad stuff i did hear were from chevy lovers(I like them too, just not as much). And of course cause everyone has one. My friends (5 of us being in our early 20's) all have muscle cars and 4 of them have late 70 T/A's. Mines behind on the power curve of being built cause I wear combat boots for a living. I'm the odd ball I guess but in the end I don't have to worry about the heckling. But I do have the smallest engine. If I heard right, correct me if I'm wrong, that the pontiac 350 is one of the better 350's made, almost compatible to the 400 besides bore size? And great lbs per ft for torque? I was thinking about upgrades to the cam (comp cam thumper maybe) but I read some where that the "poncho" 350 wasn't made to be upgraded like that. I already had a mechanic put on an edelbrock intake, holly 4 barrel, and of course new air filter mostly because it needed a new carb bad (needs a lot of new things bad). Oh...and one more thing, did the 70's take leaded fuel because i have to add substitute to mine, my father told me i would need to, so I'm thinking he changed up the valve's? I guess i shouldn't be worrying about the power plant yet, but i got my hands on an old summit mag. and i'm like a little kid with a jcpenny catalog at Christmas time with a pen and nothing but dreams. And of course it's my motivation while in the box. Someday I'll be able to get more hands on with it..and i can't wait.
|