View Single Post
  #4  
Old 11-03-2009, 08:11 AM
CadVetteStang's Avatar
CadVetteStang CadVetteStang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70rs View Post
If it is a combo of years and not original right now just build it the way you want. The value is only what someone else is willing to pay for it. How much would it sell for right now? How much would it cost you to restore to a point where it was a collector quality car? You will never get out of it what you sink in it. Build what you want and be happy.

Personally I would rebuild what is there, stick a manual trans in it and drive it. Keep the Ford drivetrain in it. (that will help the value down the road no matter what.) The Caddy motor and GM trans will not do you any favors in the value department. And you can get a HUGE amount of torque out of that Ford motor that's already in it.

It's your car, build it your way and have fun.


EDIT: I had more thoughts. I am wondering why you want to put the 500 motor in it? Is it the "dare to be different" factor or is there some performance you hope to get out of it that a big block ford will not produce? And the C4 suspension. It was designed for the corvette. The balance, weight, dimensions (and needed modifications to fit it) are way different than that Mustang could ever use. My point is that yes, the suspension is a decent one. But only in the right application. That Mustang is not the right application. Then add a 500cid Caddy motor on top of it and you make all the problems even worse.
My thoughts are just that, thoughts. I may be wrong and maybe you are onto something i am unaware of. But it would seem to me that using the Cad motor and vette suspension is a very expensive and time consuming operation with a worse handling car that has an even lower market value in the end. In other words you are wasting your time and money and not getting any performance or financial gain by doing it.
That car will handle better, stop better and just perform better with modifications to the stock drivetrain and suspension. It will be worth more in the end too just in case you ever hope to sell it.

Just my opinion.
The Caddy 500 would only add 25 pounds to the weight of a 351C car (or 30 pounds to a 350 Chevy car) The loss of the AC compressor would make up for that difference. The Caddy 500 gives you the acceleration of the big block with the cornering, stopping, and MPGs of the small block. A bone stock Caddy 500 makes the torque of a 460 or Chevy 454 that has $1,000 or more of added parts. Don’t feel bad about having all of that miss information about the Caddy 500 engine. Even though it was designed by the man who designed the 460, pulling this 460 out and putting the Cadyy 500 in would reduce the weight by 120 lbs.

This would not be the only Caddy 500 powered 71-73 Mustang that has ever been built. I had a 72 Fastback that was stolen before the project was completed. It only had a 302 in it originally, and even though the 302 was a little lighter than the 500, we were able to move the 500 back in the engine compartment enough that the 500 powered Mustang sat 1.5” higher in front than it did with the 302. We had to cut the springs to get it to come back down.

Setting the 500 back all the way to the firewall places the front of the engine in almost exactly the same place relative to the ball joints as where the 350 sits in the C4 Vette relative to the ball joints. So the engine weight (being equaled by the removal of the AC compressor) would be balanced the same as in the Vette.

Before it had a 302, my 72 was originally a 351C powered car with Power steering and AC. It weighed 2980 lbs. (approximately 200 lbs. lighter than the C4).

The torque of the 500 Caddy requires a cage and sub frame connectors to prevent breakage of the front and back glass. The weight of the cage should add about 100 to 125 lbs close to the rear wheels. Also, the battery will be moved to the trunk like it was in my last Cad-Stang project. That would move 45 lbs. from the front to the back. All in all, the weight of the car should be equal to or slightly less than that of a C4 Vette and the weight distribution should very close.

The Mustang does have a longer wheel base, however, and if the steering circle is effected by the geometry of where the tie rod ends attach, then I can swap to C5 spindles because of the very similar wheel base between the two.

In the end, the racing weigh difference and balance between this Mustang powered by a Caddy 500 with C4 suspension Vs. a stock C4 vette should be no more than the difference between two C4 Vettes – one being driven by a skinny man and the other being driven by a slightly over weight driver. The design of the car has come from over 2 years of careful research and planning (also cost cutting alternatives).

Cody
__________________
.
.
.
.

The Cadinator: 82 Eldorado, Caddy 472 (535 Lbs. Torque @ 3000 RPM) Autocross suspension, 95 Trans Am wheels.

Battlecar Cadillactica: 70 Eldorado w/stock Caddy 500(550 lbs. torque @ 3200 RPM) Known for beating Trans Ams, Camaros & Mustangs in 1985/86 Fayetteville Arkansas SCCA autocross

CadVetteStang: 72 Fastback Mustang w/500 Caddy engine, TH400, 12” disc brakes & 9” rear end. Was in storage awaiting a C4 Corvette front suspension when sold by [former] friend.
Reply With Quote