View Single Post
  #4  
Old 03-08-2010, 07:56 AM
deuce_454's Avatar
deuce_454 deuce_454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,612
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob442 View Post
If someone can show me a heavy car thats been beet on with alot of G's, and this rear has help up, i would start to lean towards it, as these rears are about half the price to buy, but its still old technology.
you mean appart from the showroom stock cars that won SCCA the first 3 years they entered from 84 to 87 before being banned... and all the SCCA corvettes racing??

and alot of g´s ?? it was my understanding that drifting involved loss of traction.. what are the g forces you refer to as "alot" ..

and old technology?? so is the internal combustion engine.. you can change the anchor points of the lower controll arms to change the cambergain.. you can move the trailing arms for varying degrees of antisquat... and with a 210 rwhp limit you would be fine with a dana 36 rear

but if this thread is about what you feel then you are the only one who can answer...
__________________
Elwood:We're 105 miles from Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, half pack of cigarettes, it's dark out and we're wearing sunglasses.
Jake: Hit it.
Reply With Quote