Quote:
Originally Posted by BBC69Camaro
Every magazine I have read that has done a comparison so far has handed the lead to the Camaro in almost every category.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog...s/4309423.html
Popular Mechanics:
2010 Camaro SS (3900lbs) - ~$35,000
0-60 4.9
1/4 13.0 @111mph
60-0 107.8ft
2010 Mustang GT (3500lbs) - $35,626
0-60 5.6
1/4 13.9 @102mph
60-0 110.8ft
Car and Driver ratings:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
Zero to 60 mph: 4.8 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 13.0 sec @ 111 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 161 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.92 g
And I think the skid pad will only get better as people figure out how to drive the Camaro *harder*.
So yes the Camaro is less fat than the Mustang despite weighing more and costing less. |
thats the gt though we're talking about the gt500
