View Single Post
  #21  
Old 09-28-2010, 06:25 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
652 TQ and 695 HP (but HP number depends on what you're willing to rev it to).

No matter what it makes -- it is killer (on paper) and I hope it works even better than your best laid plans!

To a point.. if the cam/valvetrain is "done" by 6200 then it won't matter how high we spin it (which is why a solid would have made more..)

I will just be happy if it runs nice.. I already have plenty of power, but it's fun to speculate.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote